Plan by Kimmo Rouvari

Kimmo Rouvari

Essay Abstract

What would you say if I tell you that there exists a decent probability for the total annihilation of Earth within couple of years? Because you don't know me personally you might shoot from the hip and say something like "Are you mad?", "Get real!", "Dream on" or something like that. Fair enough. Perhaps I should present my case and my action plan for you to judge.

Author Bio

Kimmo Rouvari is independent researcher focused mainly on theory of everything. He's the author of Theory of Everything by illusion.

Download Essay PDF File

Vladimir Tamari

Kimmo,

Yours is another scary message about our poor Earth!!

Can you be more specific about the people that you say are doing these experiments?

It may pass us by, as did the Millinium computer scare and those mini black holes at the LHC (about which I too worried).

I am not belittling possible danger one day from such experiments, just hoping you are wrong in this antimatter case!

Best wishes

Vladimir

Kimmo Rouvari

Vladimir,

You are not alone! I sincerely hope also that I'm wrong, but I'm afraid that I'm right. Based on analysis from my site traffic, probably (at least) Chinese and American research facilities are active on the subject.

Kimmo Rouvari

This catched my attention What are the chances that a particle collider's strangelets will destroy the Earth? Well, if people are concerned with this kind of experiments they should immediately, I repeat, immediately check what Fermilab might be planning at this moment! They have downloaded numerous times my paper about antimatter. Are they going to give it a shot? If so, they might accidentally ignite a very nasty chain reaction.

So, if anybody knows someone at Fermilab, please do something!

Philip Gibbs

Kimmo, glad you made it into the contest.

I hope you are wrong about anti-matter. I think other phenomena such as strangle ts are considered more likely dangers but when the potential impact is so high no stone must be left unturned.

Good luck

Kimmo Rouvari

Hi Philip,

Thanks to you I'm in this year, but where's your essay?

I totally agree with your suggestion on turning every stone. I have been digging into the world of physics in serious manner for two years now. I have become more and more convinced that my theory is actually the theory. There is a chance that Fermilab and some Chinese lab is planning or conducting an experiment based on my method. Hopefully, we'll get some information on the results, but I suspect that in case of positive outcome, those results get classified.

But the cheney is out of the bottle now... If nothing is done, somebody might conduct an experiment which might be the last one on Earth.

Kimmo Rouvari

One more thing. I'm at the moment writing a book about ToEbi (Introduction to Theory of Everything by illusion Sample from viXra.org). After I have finished The Foundation part (in couple of months) I'll send it to you, so you can make more informed opinion about the possibilities.

Philip Gibbs

I am still at the stage of thinking about what my essay will be about. I will probably be a late entry this year.

Kimmo Rouvari

Good to know! I'm looking forward to it :-)

Jayakar Joseph

Dear Kimmo,

Your statement, 'Every particle can act as its antiparticle' is real; while I would like to notate another paradigm, in that antimatter is in analogue with the non-observational string-matter that exists in an incoherent eigen-rotational state with the observer.

This indicates that the earth may undergo metamorphosis rather than annihilation and thus 'Steer the Future' in an environment friendly pathway sustains the survival of Humanity, to certain extent.

With best wishes, Jayakar

Jayakar Joseph

You may visit, http://www.clustermatteruniverse.net, for more clarity on the paradigm mentioned.

Jayakar

Kimmo Rouvari

Hi Jayakar,

I'll check out your site. Are you going to participate this contest? I didn't find your essay from the list.

Kimmo Rouvari

Obviously you have a work in progress. Do you a comprehensive paper of your work available? You could email it to me (kimmo.rouvari@toebi.com). It's always refreshing read other people's insights on reality :-)

James Dunn

I identify strongly with your concerns.

My plan is to have a large assembly of doctors of science and philosophy further create the monitoring systems for the NSA, and also provide ethical oversight of the data collected.

http://eliminate-all-corruption.pbworks.com

If you have an interest in doing something along these lines, contact me at

support.ua-kits.com

Unlocking Aptitude - Knowledge in Translational States

James Dunn

FQXi Submission:

Graduated Certification for Certification of Common Sense

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2045

James Dunn

typo

support@ua-kits.com

Kimmo Rouvari

Thanks for your comments! I'll read your essay in near future.

John Hodge

I also am focused on a Theory of Everything. I saw the first pages of your book. When and Where will your book be available?

We may have similar thoughts.

The development of my model to date is found in STOE correspondence to general relativity and quantum mechanics.

The STOE paper has links to other papers that discuss many other topics.

I follow Newton who speculated that light was a corpuscle that moved through a medium (ether, I call it plenum after Descartes). The keys are the capsule movement in the medium causes a wave (the rock), the waves travel faster than the corpuscle ("overtake" according to Newton), the wave then directs corpuscles. General relativity calls the meduin "space" or "gravitational ether". Matter curves space and space directs matter - sound familiar? SR or the Lorentz ether theory dictates no matter travels faster than light (photons). The plenum is not matter, like water is not rocks. The speed of the plenum wave can be a million time faster than matter. That explains quantum entanglement as a wave resonance effect. Measurement devices are matter. They require matter impacts.

What is between your FTEP spheres? Does it have any properties. You say FTE waves. What are they waving in?

The paper photon diffration of light explains my version of interference.

I have a few questions about your FTEP (my 'hod'). I think the STOE model of interference needs improvement. I think this must come from the interaction of the wave and masks. Well, more thought.

Neither Newton nor Einstein liked "action-at-the-distance" and neither do I. This is why my model has action-by-contact. I cover this in my book and my entry (section 2) in this essay contest.

I reject the "Principle of Fine Tuning" and have a replacement - see my entry (section 2). This principle is replaced by a negative feedback loop principle that also calculated a theoretical universe temperature of 2.718 K very close to the CMB 2.725 K. No other model does this.

I started from the big and worked down. 3 of my 2006 predictions have been found in 2011.

Do you have plans to examine the big of cosmology?

John Hodge

my book

Kimmo Rouvari

Hi John,

I put my book project on hold for now, antimatter experiments have the priority over the book. Hopefully, I'll get back to writing during this year. My initial plan was to use CreateSpace as you have done, but who knows, those antimatter experiments might change that plan.

"What is between your FTEP spheres? Does it have any properties. You say FTE waves. What are they waving in?"

Probably nothing, I mean FTEPs might be the smallest ingredient, or at least the smallest relevant entity. FTEPs have properties, like size and (ToEbi defined) spin vector, but because they are the smallest relevant entities those properties are not that important in interactions between FTEPs in general. FTEP waves are probably just ordered movement of FTEPs, e.g. flux from rotating Earth.

"Neither Newton nor Einstein liked 'action-at-the-distance' and neither do I. "

Count me in! :-)

"Do you have plans to examine the big of cosmology? "

I have written few random thought about phenomena in cosmology, those can be found from my blog. For now, my focus is mainly on particles and annihilation phenomenon.

I will read your essay in couple of days!

Georgina Woodward

Hi Kimmo,

I have read your scary essay. I don't know anything about antimatter research but maybe I should look into it. I think I'll put this threat together with the asteroid risk, both things I can do nothing about and therefore should not spend much time worrying about. Though I suppose there was some good news because we could use the antimatter to destroy the asteroid. Thanks for sharing your concern.

Kimmo Rouvari

Hi Georgina,

Thanks for reading my essay! I shall read yours in couple of days.

Definitely we should look for the positive possibilities like destroying dangerous asteroids and enabling long distance space travelling.