Essay Abstract

The world is at a crossroad today. There is so much we have no understanding of - dark energy, the hypothetical form of energy that permeates all of space and tends to accelerate the expansion of the universe, is perhaps the best known example. If humanity is going to steer the future, we need to remove ourselves from the darkness we're immersed in and discover the light. I believe this light will reveal what dark energy is, where it comes from, and how it originated. Further, the light could give us a new perspective on where WE came from, how the human race was born, and the role of present humankind in the grand scheme of not only our own, but the universe's, origin and destiny. The basic outline for a different perspective on the Theory of Evolution has been described in this article. When contemplating the theory of evolution, people assume evolution belongs exclusively to the biological sciences. I maintain complete comprehension also requires physics. Without a conviction that time travel is possible, I'd have to totally agree with the evolutionary concepts Darwin proposed. But since I have no doubt that time doesn't exclusively operate in a straight line (my reasons are explained below), I can propose a different origin of species - though all the species subsequently undergo adaptations throughout the centuries. In 1870, Wallace (one of Darwin's major "disciples" and the man who is often reported to have independently reached the same conclusions about evolution that Darwin did) suddenly converted to spiritualism. "Darwin's Armada" (26) states - "Wallace surmised ... that man must have been programmed for civilisation by some higher intelligence." (27) Assume Wallace's "higher intelligence" happens because, as this article puts it near the end, "eternal God and humanity of the far future are not separate...

Author Bio

I'm not a professional of any kind - just your average citizen, with a burning desire to understand how everything works (my main interest is the universe). I feel that I've been hard at work on this essay for the past 30 or 40 years. To tell the truth, I don't how I wrote it. Maybe all information already exists - and if you've got enough curiosity about something (like the future of science), all your reading and thinking assembles itself like a jigsaw puzzle. I only hope my jigsaw of the future has been put together correctly.

Download Essay PDF File

I've used elements from my entry to write the following article for vixra.org. Enjoy!

Title -

DEFINING DIVISION BY ZERO (MAKING IT NOT JUST POSSIBLE, BUT ESSENTIAL) AND RELATING ZERO TO INFINITY

Author - Rodney Bartlett

Abstract -

Mathematics books say division by zero is undefined and you should never divide by zero (the special case of 0/0 is termed "indeterminate"). According to "Einstein's Only Mistake: Division by Zero" (http://refully.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/einsteins-only-mistake-division-by-zero.html),

"When Astronomers today say they are following Einsteins theory of relatively" (Einstein's theory of relativity), "they are actually not. Partially because Einstein said the Big Bang theory made no sense. He never in his lifetime accepted the Big Bang as the way our universe came into being or Black Holes. He always looked for another explanation. (And partly because) Einstein made a school boy error in algebra. What Einstein did was divide by zero during his calculations, a no, no, in math."

"Basic Technical Mathematics with Calculus, SI Version Ninth Edition" by Allyn J. Washington (Pearson Education, 2010) states on p.9, "If 0/0 = b, then 0 = 0 x b, which is true for any value of b. Therefore, no specific value of b can be determined." My aim is to show that Einstein was perfectly correct to divide by zero, that doing so enabled him to introduce his Hidden Variables theory into quantum mechanics, that zero is not nothing but actually something, that it redefines the term infinity, and that there really is another explanation for the Big Bang as well as black holes. By the way, we may have to rebuild all those sophisticated calculators that produce an error message when you try to divide by zero.

When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence, Einstein said: time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter. I'll try to follow his example by attempting to summarize this idea of zero-infinity relation in one sentence: infinity is the total elimination of distance in space-time, and zero is the nothing (total elimination) that is something (a "creator" of space-time).

Content -

What does 0/0 truly mean? It's asking how many times is the origin on the number line of positive and negative numbers contained in zero - the nothing that is something. If we focus on its nothingness, no specific value can be determined and division by zero is undefined. But if we focus on its something-ness, zero could be said to go into zero an infinite number of times i.e. the operation gains substance, is defined, and produces determinism.

Einstein said hidden variables carry extra information about the world of quantum mechanics and complete it, eliminating probabilities and bringing about exact predictions. The variables thus bring determinism (an exact cause) to probabilistic quantum theory. Zero would be something if it's paired with one to form the binary digits which are used in computers and electronics.

I think the Roman philosopher Lucretius was correct 2,000 years ago when he said, "nothing can be created from nothing". The idea of quantum fluctuations - which are proposed by modern science in order to create the universe from nothing - is valid in a sense (quantum fluctuations actually happen because they're temporary changes in the amount of energy at points in space). But this doesn't mean the universe can be created from nothing (from, using traditional knowledge, zero alone). I think the universe, and life, began because brains acquire knowledge from the 4 dimensions of space-time. Then brains interact with a 5th-dimensional hyperspace to purposely switch the binary digits composing the universe from 1 to 0 or vice versa (this switching would be quantum fluctuations).

"DIGITAL" STRING THEORY AND RENORMALIZATION

Let's borrow a few ideas from string theory's ideas of everything being ultimately composed of tiny, one-dimensional strings that vibrate as clockwise, standing, and counterclockwise currents in a four-dimensional looped superstring - "Workings of the Universe" by Time-Life Books (1991, p.84). We can visualize tiny, one dimensional binary digits of 1 and 0 (base 2 mathematics) forming currents in a two-dimensional program called a Mobius loop - or in 2 Mobius loops, clockwise currents in one loop combining with counterclockwise currents in the other to form a standing current. Combination of the 2 loops' currents requires connection of the two as a four-dimensional Klein bottle. This connection can be made with the infinitely-long irrational and transcendental numbers. Such an infinite connection* translates - via bosons being ultimately composed of the binary digits of 1 and 0 depicting pi, e, в€љ2 etc.; and fermions being given mass by bosons interacting in matter particles' "wave packets" - into an infinite number of Figure-8 Klein bottles which are, in fact, "subuniverses" (binary digits fill in gaps and adjust edges to fit surrounding subuniverses [similar to manipulation of images by computers]). Slight "imperfections" in the way the Mobius loops fit together determine the precise nature of the binary-digit currents (the producers of space-time-hyperspace, gravitational waves, electromagnetic waves, the nuclear strong force and the nuclear weak force) and thus of exact mass, charge, quantum spin.

* If the material and immaterial universe consists of an infinite connection of transcendentals and irrationals, renormalization might be unnecessary in certain circumstances. This mathematical procedure is regarded as prerequisite for a useful theory and is used in attempts to unite general relativity with quantum mechanics to produce Quantum Gravity and the Theory of Everything. Renormalization seeks to cancel infinities - but in a literally infinite universe, retaining the infinite values might point the way to deeper understanding of the cosmos.

Mobius Loop

INFINITY

The inverse-square law states that the force between two particles becomes infinite if the distance of separation between them goes to zero. Remembering that gravitation partly depends on the distance between the centres of objects, the distance of separation between objects only goes to zero when those centres occupy the same space-time coordinates (not merely when the objects' sides are touching). That is, infinity equals the total elimination of distance - the infinite cosmos could possess this absence of distance in space and time via the electronic mechanism of binary digits, which would make the universe as malleable and flexible as any image on a computer screen. If infinity is the total elimination of distance in space-time, there would be nothing to prevent instant intergalactic travel or time travel to the past and future. Infinity does not equal nothing - total elimination of distance, or space-time, produces nothing in a physical sense and reverts to theoretical physicist Lee Smolin's imagining of strings as "not made of anything at all" - "What String Theory Tells Us About the Universe" by Dr. Odenwald : Astronomy - (April 2013, p.35). It also reverts the universe to the mathematical blueprint from which physical being is constructed (this agrees with cosmologist Tegmark's hypothesis that mathematical formulas create reality - "Is the universe actually made of math?" by Adam Frank - http://discovermagazine.com/2008/jul/16-is-the-universe-actually-made-of-math#.UZsHDaIwebs, and "The Mathematical Universe" by Max Tegmark - http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0646. So, infinity = something (mathematics, just like zero).

STEADY STATE UNIVERSE, BIG BANG SUBUNIVERSES AND BLACK HOLES

As for the new perspective on the Big Bang, don't think of space's expansion as the universe starting with a big bang and the galaxies forever flying apart. Think of it as the production of "new" space by binary digits which is added to existing space and pushes that existing space farther and farther away. The Law of Conservation says new space isn't created from nothing but is converted from something else. It may be speculated that new space is converted from the BITS (BInary digiTS) of 1 and 0. (Does ultra-advanced human computer technology of the far future have a role in the universe's origin and destiny?)

Also, recall that each "subuniverse" (bubble or pocket universe) is one of a series of figure-8 Klein bottles (extending infinitely in every direction) composing the physically infinite and eternal space-time of the universe. The infinite numbers make the cosmos physically infinite, the union of space and time makes it eternal, and it's in a static or steady state because it's already infinite and has no room for expansion. Our own subuniverse has a limited size (and age of 13.8 billion years), is expanding from a big bang, and has warped space-time because it's modelled on the Mobius loop, which can be fashioned by giving a strip of paper a 180-degree twist before joining the ends. (It may have DOUBLE STRANDED, spiralling DNA because the universe is modelled on TWO twisted Mobius loops.)

And the new perspective on black holes would be - in the case of the sun, our star would become a black hole if it was compressed to 2.95 kms ("From the Big Bang to Dark Energy" - a lecture on coursera.org by Hitoshi Murayama from the University of Tokyo), in which case the pressure increase "shreds" the sun into its binary digits. In other words, its mass is relativistically converted into the energy of binary digits i.e. the bosons stop interacting in wave packets to produce the forces we identify as mass, and the bosons - which are ultimately composed of the binary digits depicting pi, e, в€љ2 etc. (see "Digital String Theory") - register as 1's and 0's.

I found your essay quite engrossing Mr. Bartlett.

Unfortunately, man is the only animal that has ignored natural evolution. Instead of survival of the fittest, man has introduced the concept of domination by the weakest. What Darwin described as adaptive process, man calls disease. Instead of allowing cancer to be bred out naturally, certain select men profit immensely by pretending to be able to cure it. Modern man is now so contemptuous of himself, he cannot wait to build a robot that will be able to pilot a spaceship capable of traveling faster than the speed of light that will zoom far away where imbecilic man cannot go.

    Hmm... maybe the next step in evolution is the rise of machines. They are more potent than human beings, at least in couple of centuries.

    Hello Rodney,

    It's good to see you have an entry here. Since I agree with your premise that humanity's destiny is to evolve toward a more godlike state, I am eager to read what you have to say.

    All the Best,

    Jonathan

      Dear Rodney,

      Evolution is based on Beneficial mutation and Natural Selection, whereas the manifestation of Harmful mutation is prevalence in the higher order of species in the taxonomic hierarchy on biological classification. Margin of Beneficial mutation for 'Survival of the Fittest' that drives Evolution, is more with the lower order of species and thus Virus have maximum range of Beneficial mutation for them to fight against immunity. Another factor that is observational with Humanity is that, though the quantum of 'Survival of the Fittest' is prevalence with the socio-economically backward Humanity that is due to immunity development, there is emerging limitation due to incomparable benchmark of Virus and other lower order organisms in mutation.

      Thus physically, Godlike Humanity Will Not Emerge and moreover if we do not Steer the Future in an environment friendly pathway, only Evil like Humanity Will Emerge from the present Humanity. As the implications of all scientific developments converges to healthcare, précised scientific principles to be determined, in that investigating the nature of time is profoundly imperative.

      Hello Jonathan,

      It's good to be here. I somehow got into deep discussion at "Quark Stars - A New Form of Matter" (http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1971) and I'm having fun! The fun is going to end very soon because I've enrolled in some university courses that will take up all my time (but they'll be a different kind of fun). I remember your kindness from last year, and am glad you agree with my premise. I hope you had a good time reading my thoughts.

      All the best,

      Rodney

      9 days later

      Dear Rodney,

      You are absolutely right about describing "GOD" as a fully quantum entangled being. If we realize our self we are that being. A simple question

      "who am I?" will reveal the universal truth.

      Please see the blog and videos about this universal truth at

      Conscience is the cosmological constant.

      Love,

      I

      2 months later

      In a million years, we will have god-like abilities. Civilizations likely pre-existed us by billions of year.

      God-like versus God

      http://jamesbdunn2.blogspot.com/2008/01/god-like-versus-god_11.html

      We cannot know the difference between advanced species and what we consider God. Every atom of our body may be influenced by untold numbers of advanced intelligence. Us in a million years.

      James Dunn

      FQXi Submission:

      Graduated Certification for Certification of Common Sense

      http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2045

      Hi Rodney,

      I have read your essay. personally I found it rather too theoretical for ease of reading and comprehension. The abstract helped. You have,it sounds, got a lot of ideas that you have wanted to share and, at least for me, too many to take in all at once.Though others may find the dense 'matter of fact' style to their liking. I find the time travel ideas too far fetched but appreciate that according to certain interpretation of relativity theory alone, time travel to the past is theoretically feasible. I appreciate the desire to find a place for God in all of that theory. Thank you for sharing your many ideas. Georgina

        Thanks a lot for reading my essay, Georgina. I couldn't understand why my essay was rating so poorly. Now I see it's because most people would also feel that there's too much to take in all at once. You're right - I do have a lot of ideas I want to share. And the contest limited the amount of space I had to explain those ideas (hence the dense "matter of fact" style.

        I've been developing the ideas for years and years, which is probably why the dense style doesn't bother me. I appreciate that it might be a bit overwhelming for anyone reading it for the first time. Perhaps reading the steps taken to arrive at these conclusions would be easier reading. The 51 short articles I've writeen during the past two years and posted at my vixra.org page might make my essay's development clearer.

        If it doesn't help, the essay should be here for a very long time. In that time, time travel should become reality, and there will be many other advances. The advances and reality of time travel, plus the long availability of the essay, will contribute to making it readable.

        Dear Bartlett

        I also affirm that : evolutionary theory must be consistent with the theory of physics or theology, and vice versa - it would really be the truth.

        Therefore, Physics and Theology at present there are many problems also inappropriate.

        Assessment by the highest score for the passion and enthusiasm of you.

        Along with best wishes - Hải.CaoHoàng

        My essay is questioning one aspect of biology (by stating that complete understanding of biological evolution requires what we could call "new physics"). So I'll be self-consistent, and question another aspect of biology -

        Does cholesterol actually help prevent vascular disease?

        In "Essentials of Human Anatomy and Physiology" (Tenth Edition) by Elaine N. Marieb - Pearson Education Limited 2014, it's stated on p. 80 that "The cholesterol helps keep the (cell, or plasma) membrane fluid." Could this mean cholesterol is innocent in causing cardiovascular disease? Heart problems might actually be caused by decades of activity of that organ's moving parts gradually causing the heart to wear out, while deterioration of blood vessels would be the result of decades of friction with the blood. This deterioration can cause arteriosclerosis and the rough patches resulting from constant friction could cause blood clots. With increasing age, the liver produces more and more cholesterol in an effort to keep the cells lining the blood vessels in an elastic state. If this is what really happens, the increased cholesterol accompanying the increased cardiovascular disease would lead to the understandable, but incorrect, assumption that the former causes the latter.

        16 days later

        P.S., I will use the following rating scale to rate the essays of authors who tell me that they have rated my essay:

        10 - the essay is perfection and I learned a tremendous amount

        9 - the essay was extremely good, and I learned a lot

        8 - the essay was very good, and I learned something

        7 - the essay was good, and it had some helpful suggestions

        6 - slightly favorable indifference

        5 - unfavorable indifference

        4 - the essay was pretty shoddy and boring

        3 - the essay was of poor quality and boring

        2 - the essay was of very poor quality and boring

        1 - the essay was of shockingly poor quality and extremely flawed

        After all, that is essentially what the numbers mean.

        The following is a general observation:

        Is it not ironic that so many authors who have written about how we should improve our future as a species, to a certain extent, appear to be motivated by self-interest in their rating practices? (As evidence, I offer the observation that no article under 3 deserves such a rating, and nearly every article above 4 deserves a higher rating.)

        Your essay is a breakthrough, Aaron. I love it! Everyone is preoccupied with the rating of their own essay in this contest. Your concept of foreknowledge breaks free of this cycle of being the most popular and winning the most money. It seeks to describe true knowledge and humanity's true place in the universe.

        Virtually every person who has ever lived - and virtually every person who's living now - accepts that other places exist beyond the horizon. They'd never be so foolish as to believe the world and universe are limited to the tiny bit they can see. But even though they know space and time are scientifically united into space-time, they do believe time ceases to exist outside the tiny bit they personally experience (of course, some people solve this dilemma by refusing to believe time even exists). They say there is no future, and we must create it. For some reason, they believe that time is different from space, and that there is a "temporal horizon" beyond which nothing exists (either in the past or in the future). Many physicists say time travel is possible (my essay seeks to explain how travel to the past is also possible) ... but how can any type of time travel occur if nothing exists outside of our present nanosecond?

        I can't rate your essay right now coz I apparently need a rating code from FQXi. I've emailed them about this and as soon as I learn what my rating code is, I'll give your essay the appropriate rating such a breakthrough deserves.

        Hi Rodney,

        Wow, thank you for your kind words. I'm glad you liked my essay so much. I have just downloaded yours and I am impressed by what I see. I am happy to meet a kindred spirit, and I think we can learn a lot from one another. I would like to share my much more complete work on the topic of foreknowledge machines and time travel with you, Understanding Future-Viewing Machines and Time Travel. To email me, so that I can email you the gift code, go to its Amazon.com page. Then, hover over my name and a link will open up to go to my author page, where you will see my email address.

        It is nice to meet you in these circumstances. I wish you the best and look forward to our conversations. Have a great weekend.

        Aaron

        5 days later

        hi rodney

        Very prophetic essay that is.to me i give you 6/10.In my essay i have written about the great transition and addressed challenges and solutions during this transitory periiod.take your time to read/rate my essay - LIVING IN THE SHADOWS OF THE SUN: REALITIES, PERILS ESCAPADES MAN, PLANET AND KARDASHEV SCALE.MAKING THE GREAT TRANSITION by Michael muteru -here http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2101.wishin you all the best

        11 days later

        Rodney,

        I was told, I think last year, by a fellow participant in this contest that I shouldn't reference Kaku because his ideas are too unorthodox. Like you, I don't believe that any idea is out of consideration, and my essay speaks that when I say "Look beyond" the accepted and to the unorthodox. We are not close to understanding the brain's capacity, which many have called the neural universe.

        We are a type 0 civilization, in Kaku's eyes, and as such we cannot begin to know the affect of type 2 discoveries on our doctrines.

        Sometimes the unschooled in physics like us consider the unorthodox like surpassing the speed of light, which I speak about in my essay.

        Jim