Essay Abstract

What if Einstein was still with us to share his wisdom and experience with troubled humanity? He had strong opinions about three core issues affecting our future: world peace and the threat of nuclear war, social inequality, and the Israel/Palestine problem...

Author Bio

Vladimir F. Tamari is a Palestinian artist, inventor and physicist living in Japan since 1970. He studied at the American University of Beirut where he met and was inspired by Buckminster Fuller (around 1960). He invented and built 3D drawing instruments. In the 1980's he joined the Optical Society of America to keep up with the field and holds U.S. patents for inventions based on his Streamline Diffraction Theory to cancel diffraction in imaging instruments. His theory "Beautiful Universe: Towards Reconstructing Physics From New First Principles (2005)" is found on vladimirtamari.com.

Download Essay PDF File

Hi Vladimir,

Very funny essay which kept me smiling from reading the title to the last paragraph! Well done on some excellent illustrations too. Very enjoyable and an easy read.

    Thank you Alan and Kimmo

    I am glad you smiled that was intended. But perhaps I covered the pill with too much sugar!

    Vladamir, It is good to have a light essay to deliver such an important message.

    I have a technical question. If Einstein is hoping to roll sixes with his tesseracts, what are the seventh and eighth sides labelled with?

    Hello Phillip

    I neither know craps nor 4-dimensional geometry - but I would guess complex number dots!

    Vladimir

      Mr. Tamari,

      I found your essay a delightful read. I do hope that it scores quite highly in the competition for it certainly deserves to do so.

      Vladimir,

      I'll do one better than Joe Fisher, I hope you win! The answer seems so obvious when one truly meditates on the nature of things . . .

      It is a good expression dear Vladimir, that is the reality. Anyhow we may have to derive some parameters to steer the future scientific developments and to regulate technological advancements in humanity. I think the ultimate direction of developments is to be for better healthcare on humanity. As the developments in Biological sciences is fully depends on the developments in Physical sciences, we may have to be much responsible in declaring our findings on Nature's laws and principles, while steer the future.

      In relevant to this, time paradox seems to have most profound impact, causal by the defective steering of the past in Physical science developments. Thus we may have to steer the future physical sciences while presuming the Universe in Continuum rather than in Corpuscularianism.

        Thank you so much Joe and Wesley!

        And thank you Jayakar, I think you have to expand your ideas in an essay for this year's 2014 faqxi completion.

        Best to all of you

        Vladimir

        I'm happy to see your essay here Vladimir,

        I'm also eager to read what you have written. Judging by the comments, and glancing at the opening page, it looks like it will be a lot of fun to read.

        More later,

        Jonathan

        6 days later

        Dear Vladimir!

        I liked your essay. That is witty, enjoyable to read, has much wisdom how and why the things are unfortunately going wrong so much times.

        Einstein however having had - I told them so much, but they even had done ... it had not a matter of me ... I'd already passed over into Heaven ...- attitude.

        I'm curious;

        1. What if Einstein should get a chance to rethink and resolve - How can a theory in physics apply to moral values?

        Because he said:

        ."...I just dealt with the relative effects of motion on observers moving in different inertial frames in space and time

        ... And in any case the future is in time, an element of spacetime - and that is dependent on the observer in the frame of reference...

        ...The absence of an absolute spacetime frame of reference does not mean there are no absolute philosophical ethical standards for humanity."

        2. Whether what did the Exalted Personage tell him about the Dark matter, and even Dark energy not dealing with so much about mathematics but in a probable connection with the doubt and stupidity? Should it help humanity to steer his destiny yet?

        3. Asking Exalted Personage - So, if they feel religion has failed, why do they turn to physics only for answers?

        Jesus: Tell people to love and forgive one another, even their enemies.

        (Unfortunately, the love alone is not quite enough to do the things almost well done. The forgiving is a high standard requirement, and the hardest may be one to forgive himself.)

        Shakespeare is right. (I agree.. our fate is not in the stars but in ourselves, and presumably one need to swim.. at least keeping afloat on waves.. and not struggling in swirls. :)

        Jesus: They are clever enough to figure out the rest!

        --------------------------------------------------------------

        I agree too, with Jayakar Johnson Joseph's concept. I feel also the 'physics' need to be matured and swimmingly interconnected with else fields of natural sciences, as a continuity of our healthy knowledge about our life and our inner-outer universe. I feel Einstein knows well he was once and presumably will be "... in any case the future is in time, an element of spacetime - and that is dependent on the observer in the frame of reference..."

        --------------------------------------------------------------

        Vladimir, glancing over abstracts of your papers put for previous FQXi contests, I feel you are putting together them into this one.

        You wrote, "..There is a Cloud of Unknowing obscuring the true nature of Reality because... in the channel or medium they pass through until they are finally observed at macroscopic scales. A similar Cloud obscures Reality when these experimental results are subjected to fallible logical and mathematical analysis. There is a necessity to examine our philosophy of knowing..." , I agree!

        I suggest to think you within your present body, and presumably you may do further studying Gariaev's Brief introduction into WaveGenetics.

        Best wishes, and further good works for you.

          Thank you Jonathan, looking forward to your essay.

          Thank you Gyenge,

          Every one of the issues raised in the sentences you quoted, and also in the ideas you wrote about or referred to needs to be examined further and coordinated in a practical way so that we can continue to live and work in a new way, free of meaningless restrictions based on a misunderstanding of our nature and that of the world around us. But do we really have time for that? Can the sort of problems my story-Einstein and Co. are concerned with wait the judgement of science and possible acceptance of WaveGenetics (for example, or even my Beautiful Universe Theory) ? More urgent political action with the rough and ready tools humanity has here and now is the best we can do in the present and developing crisis.

          Vladimir

          Dear Vladimir!

          Connecting your posts written on my essay site and here...

          I can deeply understand your stance "I would rather ...and leave to more specialised researchers like you the larger questions... ".

          However, you write here "...we can continue to live and work in a new way...But do we really have time for that? Can the sort of problems my story-Einstein..."

          I do not want to bother you with too much information...

          But I think, you are a more specialised researcher than me, and also due to your story and deep empathy with Einstein...I feel a need to write these lines to you now.

          My only catalysing task should be to draw to your attention, the political crisis on present physical Earth comes from much rather an ideology based war.

          So what is urgent to reinstate the thoughts about our ideology seeing a healthy world or taking a necessary rough and ready tools humanity actions? (As Einstein meditated ...whom would you presume to place at the helm... and how about his role and why the H-bomb was necessary to set in before Hitler should have done that... This all about 'time-travel' truly there is not rocket involved ;)

          How else if not one of Einsteins can understand this?

          Do you think really there are calm and peace in Heaven?

          Can be an idealized Heavenly peace reached on Earth? (e.g by The Cancellation of Diffraction in Wave Fields making a beautiful Universe by Fixing Physics. Perhaps printing 3d guns need to be prevented, however every invention can entail its counter effect ) Or "do we hope doing new life start on some other planet or star, merely transplanting our possible stupid mistakes somewhere else...?"

          Its understanding is time-space, space-time separated yet in ones' higher and lower mind. Therefore ones cannot express this coherently using a given actual genetic sets arranged by a given space-time framework. As Einstein said - ...that could be dependent on the observers in the frame of reference.

          Unfortunately, because man is able to create as a result he can change his own life supporting form. Thus there is a risk truly to transform a planet to be something else. But, that is also one's abstract view point this transformation is put into an else frame of reference i.e. creating meanings of else stars systems or planets, or all may happen in same space and no time.

          On my essay illustration one can see the lower mind (123 folds) attached to an actual arrangement of bodily gene set with a given bodyIDl. The (567 folds) represents one's higher mind also attached to same bodyIDh, [this is why one's head cannot be so crudely attached to someone else body:)] There is a separation between 4-8,9 states [dividing the factually two 3-fold i.e branes or world volumes. Btw, should the cyclic model by Steinhardt-Turok speak about this using a very physical language set ?) Additionally: ."..in special relativity Elsewhere is the region between the two light cones. Points in an observer's elsewhere are inaccessible to her/him;the elsewhere is thick; it is not a 3-dimensional volume but is instead a 4-dimensional spacetime region. Included in "elsewhere" is the simultaneous hyperplane, which is defined for a given observer by a space which is hyperbolic-orthogonal to her/his world line. It is really three-dimensional. The present often means the single spacetime event being considered. Where ones' bodyIDl and bodyIDh presumably vibrate at same level and it should be extended by a general meaning as a collision between two branes as 3d parallel worlds, but not creating destructive singularity.

          in general relativity: World lines of free-falling particles or objects (such as planets around the Sun or an astronaut in space) are called geodesics...World line. (2014) Retrieved 25 Feb 2014, from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_line. So, go to Buckmister Fuller and his Spaceship Eart concept without a rocket. :))]

          I do not know how you can contribute more to help the ideological development in your present life or wishes a new life one of yours, but I can see glancing over your personal site you have already vast specialised knowledge!!!

          In what I'm sure we can continue to live and work in a new way...

          But do we really have time for that?

          Yes, we have as much time as we give or create for ourselves something to be almost well done. Because the time is not a natural things but a created one. Presumably, we need times only to apprehend we should act balanced in our PRESENT moment!

          My only role is to push forward and catalysing the process of our understanding for every one of present us acting optimally balanced in his place right on Earth in the NOW!

          4 days later

          Dear sridattadev kancharla a.k.a. I

          Thank you for your loving message of appreciation.

          Your mathematical paradoxes (or deep truths?) are amusing.

          With best wishes

          Vladimir

          Dear Vladimir,

          An interview with Einstein is an interesting concept! (and thank you for the reply to my comment here)

          i joined the contest this year and you can read it here. i do hope you would make some comments to my essay and theory by Einstein.

          more later,

          ryoji

            Hi Vladimir,

            What a wonderfully imaginative idea -- and with your exquisite paintings. I had hoped before the reporter was sent away he'd gotten to ask how many more they have room for up there -- or should humans steer into the future with a lower birth rate on Earth.

            always with great admiration,

            Ken

            Dear Kenneth

            Thank you so much for your kind words.

            I should have had somebody mention overcrowding!

            I am not sure how much room they have up there, but after a long life I am sure there will be a luxury suite reserved just for you - complete with wifi - so send me an email to wherever I end up!

            eternal admiration

            Vladimir

            6 days later
            12 days later

            Vladimir,

            This is a clever idea, a conversation hard to create effectively, as you did.

            I have read much about Einstein and a little bit of his essay, "The World as I Know it," and wonder if he would rail against all humans like "the sharp razor in the hands of a three-year-old."

            In "The World as I know it," his ideal is democracy, letting every man/woman exercise free will, as I remember it. Did he have a streak of pessimism, "Chaos always winning out?" Certainly he was against military uses of technology as you mention.

            Good job on a difficult task. I'm not sure representing Einstein accurately (attitude and words) is the priority in "steering us" through an imaginary conversation. Certainly the criticism he speaks are steps in the right direction.

            Best wishes,

            Jim

            4 days later

            Dear Jim

            Thank you for your nice comments. As I mentioned in a footnote, the essay benefitted from the contributions of an anonymous co-author. The quote you objected to is by him, and I plead ignorance of the source of its origin. Having said that, and with Einstein's "infinite stupidity" quote about human capability at its worst, the quote is not so far-fetched. Particularly with his known worries about atomic weapon proliferation in mind.

            Yes putting words in Einstein's mouth poses some questions. Was he a pessimis? Hmm food for thought. More importantly we the living can benefit from the wisdom, experience and mistakes of those great ones who went before us.

            Good luck to you..and to us all.

            Vladimir

            7 days later

            Hi.Its been a long time since I read what Einstein actually said about Poincare's or Lorentz's prior discoveries in relativity so please take what I wrote with a grain of salt. More serious than the question of priority is the long and winding road reaching a dead end that Einstein took physics: By denying the ether and by making space and time flexible and c constant a priori he demolished the possibility of Lorentz' relativity in absolute space and time with a maximum of c but a variable speed of light. Read my fqxi essay Fix Physics for more along these lines.

              Delightful essay! - witty, well-informed, and sane.

              Dear Roger,

              While I agree on that Vladimir Tamari's essay is a delightful homage on the nice place called heaven in general and Pentcho Valev's divine Einstein in particular, I cannot see how these sweet ideals will steer mankind in a reasonable manner. On the contrary, traditional belief might be part of the problem rather than the solution. I see no pill, at best a placebo and for my taste too much of sugar.

              That's why you might check what I found out (2021) about H. Poincaré and Kuratowski's Ghost who lives in South Africa.

              Regards,

              Eckard

              I am not sure what you think was a dead end, but Lorentz used a constant speed of light, and Einstein got that directly from Lorentz.

              Roger a constant and maximum speed of light in vacuume does result from the Lorentz transformations, but imposing it ipso facto leads to trouble, as Einstein himself discovered when he realized that light speed decreases in a gravitational field. Basing GR on flexi-space and time as dimensions has made gravity too complicated. In an absolute time and space gravity can probably be described simply as the result of local density and twisting gradients in an ether. Worse is Einstein's photon as a point particle concept the innocent-looking idea - now experimentally disproven by Eric Reiter - that has created duality and the conceptual logjam that has bedevilled physics since the 1920's.

              Dear Eckard

              I could understand how you might have found Einstein's heaven too saccharine for your taste. I may have sugared the pill too heavily because if you read between the lines you can see that I am saying "even Einstein" could not find a solution. I am not sure I would call Einstein divine - I certainly disagree with his physics but admire him as a man who believed in peace. At the same time I recognize that humanity should try to learn from all sources available, including religious and moral ideals, however badly we have misapplied them. I see we were born in the same year, and therefore I will happily check out your essay!

              Best,

              Vladimir

              Dear Vladimir,

              I got the impression that a more cosmologically and belief-oriented part of fqxi community favors rather mystical, illusory, and mathematical speculative answers to the question of how to steer humanity in contrast to the more practically oriented attitudes of you, Jonathan, and me.

              Roger might have overlooked my hints because he can perhaps not accept that I am questioning absolutely infinite physically items. Well, I was one of very few nobodies until Hawking recently corrected himself and Jonathan got aware of related theoretical arguments by Kauffmann.

              You certainly know that Roger called Einstein overestimated. I merely collected some less celebrated facts and leave the judgment to the readers. What about pacifists like Einstein and Bertrand Russell, I would like to tell that the latter suggested a preventive war against the territory occupied by the Soviet Army including Magdeburg, the city where I am living. That's why I prefer and quoted Otto von Bismarck who also prudently built (more than one hundred years ago) a bypass to the main stream of the river Elbe that up to now protected Magdeburg against flooding. Bismarck called a preventive war a suicide for fear to die. An tragic parallel was Goedel who deliberately starved and actually died for fear to get poisoned.

              I would very much appreciate if you or someone else took issue concerning a fundamental question that I consider unresolved in current physics not just since and by Einstein; the past cannot be steered while the future is open and only partially predictable.

              As a boy, I learned to pray in humility. Meanwhile I see religions often the problem rather than the solution. Suicide bombers were told getting rewarded by virgins in heaven. The bad ones are always the enemies, the non-believers.

              Best,

              Eckard

              Thanks Eckard I have looked at Google map of Magdeburg and could see some man-made channels or canals parallel to the river are these the ones Bismarck planned? My knowledge of German history is quite limited and the reputation that Bismarck as a warmonger seems to be ill-deserved. I do like his mustache and the delta function atop his helmet, though.

              Perhaps Bertrand Russell sat down and calculated the cost of waging war vs not doing so. As did Harry Truman calculating the cost of dropping the A-bomb on Hiroshima vs not doing so. All that I can say is that great men come in a variety of sizes and shapes, and it is not easy to judge just by their reputation. The overblown reputation of Einstein as a physicist is a case in point. As to suicide bombing all parties involved now seem to have realized how counterproductive these desperate acts are, however justified they seem to be by the overwhelming injustice that made them a last-resort option.

              Peace!

              Vladimir

              Thank you dear Jayakar

              Things are developing so fast in all the sciences one does not know where to look..physics, astronomy, biology, and each branch inspires ever newer tehnologfical advantages. As you say healthcare is mnost important. Including mental health as a new generation grows up staring at iphones and tablets!

              The question of time is fascinating, but there is not much we can do about it. Things change, and in keeping track of these changes we use clocks and other devices. However according to many physicsists and my own Beautiful Universe theory, time as a dimension does not exist.

              If we realize that it will remind us not to live in the past, nor fear the future, but to have peace, and try our best to do good in the now.

              Best,

              Vladimir

              Very happy to see you

              You was change the style compared to the previous times, but that still very interesting essay.

              Best wishes with the highest score for the passion and enthusiasm of you

              Hải.CaoHoàng

              Hello Hoang cao

              how are you?

              Thank you for your kind comment. I will see if you have an essay!

              Good luck

              Vladimir

              Dear Vladimir,

              Many thanks for an extremely interesting essay! Humor and deep fantasy is very necessary to address the issues the future of Umanity. I hope that physics and poetry together solve the major problems of our time, created by the people themselves.

              I wish you good luck!

              All the Best,

              Vladimir

                I really enjoyed this essay because it was quite imaginative and entertaining. On the c-constant, I would have to say that it is an Energy Constant but not a light-speed constant. The Aether exists as the work of Maxwell (if not Lorentz and Faraday) is based upon it. The equations using the Parameters of Space have a deep connection to the Aether for which those parameters define. Einstein's work wasn't without flaw. He never mathematically finished the equation of Special Relativity and his Theory of General Relativity was incorrect. He had half the equation of General Relativity correct (his initially derived equation), but the Riemann Geometry was wrong. I have found that gravitation is due to dipolar, rotational kinetic-energy. I discovered that when I figured out what the 8PI in Einstein's Field Equation represented. I linked the right-hand side of Einstein's Field Equation with Ampère's Force Law. I believe that this integration of Gravity and an Electromagnetic Force Law is the Unified Field Equation. You can read my essay "How Should Himanity Steer the Future? by Stephen Tuck" for more information.

                Dear Vladmir

                A truely intresting essay and fun to read.I have a question though. Given a chance to enter heaven wouldn't one aim his thought provoking and foundational question on life the universe and everything seen and unseen at THE CREATOR Himself?!

                  Vladimir,

                  Great to see you back, and you certainly still know how to make an essay stand out. After reading a few essays brevity is also now becoming a pluspoint!

                  You subtly make a good number of good points without labouring anything. I think the most important may be reminding all that the; "observer has a limitless capacity for stupidity".

                  That alone is worth a bunch of credits as it's just as true now as when he said it! I'm losing a little conviction that it will ever change.

                  I'll value your comments on mine as I hope it's seminal this year. Few people seem to know Bob and Alice that well so I hope it'll show them in a good light through their work.

                  Very best wishes.

                  Peter

                    Thank you Peter - another explanation for the mistakes humans make is that the problem is intractable, yet they are doing their best. Seen from another point of view or in hindsight it may appear as an act of almost deliberate foolishness. The human factor in steering the future has been more optimistically reviewed in Sabine's essay. I will read yours - and yes I have heard of Bob and Alice the star-crossed lovers that are forever entangled but can never meet!

                    Best,

                    Vladimir