"We're trying to construct a dictionary," says Van Raamsdonk, that allows physicists to translate descriptions of our complex universe into simpler terms.
I believe the future of science s going to face some adjustments in terms of we see the relationship of dimension, as having not the context of Abott's relationship of rebels, but more to realize that seeing in abstract spaces, helps to orientate what consciousness is capable of doing. So, if consciousness is able to interpenetrate the materialist versions with which we have come to accept of science then that adjustment will be that consciousness is capable of operating within the materialistic rages of that materialistic operation.
So a the same time we might say linguistically, that English, French, or German might represent an aspect of our ability to see consciousness at work, then it seems to me that, the true language of consciousness has to be ascertained. In this way the computer chip will have to be reconsidered in terms of the quantum domains that we currently assess as a function of quantum mechanics in an uncertain world.
You may say then that fuzzy logic deals with this move toward the qubit, and entanglement ascertains a deeper connection to the information to what resides in the black-hole? Does an internal flow through recognize the ability of entanglement to become ineffective?