• [deleted]

  • Post #13

Janko,

Thank you for an entertaining and idea-filled essay. I especially liked it when you write: "I think that it is necessary to wake up genuine interest in TOE without argumentation why it is necessary to save the earth. I also cannot explain clearly how TOE should help to save earth, but my intuition tells me that it will help."

While we wait for the TOE, we will need all the help we can get! My bet is on education, but as all the wonderful essays in this contest show, there are many, many ways to tackle the issue!

Good luck in the contest,

Marc

    Hi Janko,

    I did look at your work on SR, I followed some of it, and it gave me a headache.

    Please allow me to return the favor. If you will please visit my physics website

    www.digitalwavetheory.com

    There are differences and similarities you may find interesting.

    Don Limuti

    dear Janko,

    Thank you for reading my essay,

    I read with great pleasure yours.

    You wrote : "We need to explain consciousness to confirm whether "atheism" is in concordance with science" My perception of Total Simultaneity is one (scientific) way of explaining our reality and how it is emerging. Atheism is another approach that could accept my perception because when you are talking about a TOE , this is an effort to do so. The name of a "creator" has become the "observer" like in QM , so it is Consciousness that is The Creator based on the scientific references I gave, all the other Names of GOD are also creations of the human consciousness, Belief is just another way of explaining "reality".

    I like very much the text of Phil Gibbs...

    Life after death, I feel so free to classify this as the same as life before birth, The Non-caused Consciousness in TS is eternal and non causal so the life line as created by its caused part here in this causal reality is only a blink of the totality, there are an infinity of "AVAILABLE" YOU's in TS. So life after death in this causal reality life line will be available but therefore we must have MORE contact (entanglement) with the non causal Consciousness in TS, so that the Eternal Now Moments of the other YOU's can be brought into this causal reality. The question however is if you want to imprison that YOU in this reality ?

    I will sent you on your private mail my latest article that is still in review by Deepak Chopra.

    Good luck and best regards.

    Wilhelmus

    Dear Janko Kokosar,

    You have a number of interesting points in your essay. I particularly like your statement that "this will contains also inertia." That is a very nice observation that I had not thought of but it fits my ideas as well.

    You also speculate that the universe does not exist without consciousness. As I interpret this statement I agree with you.

    Part of your focus is government support for a TOE, but I do not believe a theory of everything will come out of government efforts. Instead a Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, or Schrodinger will find the TOE through his own efforts. It will not require a large hadron collider, only a large brain.

    I also like your statement: "It is known that consciousness is unexplained, but this fact is not stressed in books for students." Instead students are led to believe that conscious awareness and will arise from Darwinian evolution, which is unproven and almost certainly false.

    I like your analogy of FQXi and viXra to free markets. And I agree with most of the statements expressed in your comment on my page.

    You have far too many interesting observations and remarks to comment on them all, but your essay was a pleasure to read. Thanks for reading my essay and commenting on it and thanks for your essay.

    Edwin Eugene Klingman

    Dear Janko

    I had a lot of fun reading your essay and I think it. was a bolt but good choice to write a science fiction story. I like your optimism, although I don't share it.

    I'm reading your paper on relativistic mass and hope I can soon comment on that.

    My rating shoud bring you up a bit.

    Regards

    Luca

    Janko,

    First of all, it's very daring and clever of you to include real contributors to this contest and other actual people as "characters" in your story. I also approve of bringing more amateurs - carefully, however - into the research process. It will take a little more time to digest your points, I'd rather do it well than quickly. That's my comment so far and I will be back (remind me if need be.)

    - Neil Bates

    Dear Janko,

    I think yours is a very interesting essay which, in a very accessible way, discusses important issues relevant to the future of humanity, including consciousness and information.

    I am looking forward to following up and reading the references at the end of your essay when I have more time.

    Regards,

    Lorraine.

    I did not know, but I find this on Wikipedia. It is a really similar conclusion.

    Thank you for information.

    I did not know, but I find this on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Question.

    It is a really similar conclusion.

    Thank you for information.