Dear Johnson Joseph! (I guess those are your given names)
I read your essay with curiosity! Albeit what you had written in your essay is a bit too technical, I think it deserves for a higher score due to its relevancy and written quality. (What conditions was predetermined for the rating policies at this contest.) I'm opposed to lower someone's score just because one who reads an essay doesn't understand it exactly or that do not fit into his views.
Your premise is "..While 'Steer' is the control in real-time, Control theory is considered as the tool to find solution for, 'How Should Humanity Steer the Future?', in that the Universe itself is a Real-time control system. "
I think, 'to steer' something doesn't directly depend on whether there is 'Control system' established or not. 'To steer' means rather leading (going, proceeding or going in advance; showing the way), moving, going etc. into one direction. The 'Control system' is a tool to get a conscious confirmation about how the things go well or not during 'steering', and a possibility to step in.
I'm curious: Which Universe do you esteem to be a Real-Time working system? (We need to discern a system can proceed, work without control)
I also wonder whether what would be your opinion of my essay, which also mention ."The mind conscious conceptualization works real-time and instantaneously imprints the results both on the body and mind thus in this kind of state of existence everything can happen just in time factually without time dilatant. One should know all and act instantaneously, but he is not able to consciously estimate the effects of his deeds and is not able to remember only for short time. One has no conscious awareness and so called long time memory reading back and forth capability even if just all one experiences impressions are imprinted and written instantaneously in one's genes and also his mind or so called light-bodies imprint"
I think, we need to further elaborate on: What would the LIVING IN a Total Simultaneity mean in the context of reincarnation (= until it has been an unscientific term, - but the contemporary string and M-theory may be near to describe it -, for one's, ones' experiences, memories as a consciousness imprints having folded and recorded into subtle energy light bodies, and how the fabric of Time and Space, Space and Time frameworks created truly for being been not only a holographic representation of several of 3D alternative realities as probabilities patterns, but factually arranged ones too into physical/genetically coded bodies, who think probably for answering to them selves: What and how to control our reality creation, what is desirable to steer.) and being fully aware of what we should do, how to decide in the Right NOW MOMENT, so the created Technologies by us basically for our well-being there not be an Existential Risk!
Let me mention also what the 'eigen' would mean in the origin of word. (By http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenvalue,_eigenvector_and_eigenspace:
The prefix eigen- is adopted from the German word eigen for "self-" or "unique to", "peculiar to", or "belonging to" in the sense of "idiosyncratic" in relation to the originating matrix.)
So we need to put much focus on the 'self-transformation' of one or ones: who
(probably quite natural humans, but with an advanced knowledge about the Nature and its interrelation with thoughts about it) had already created 'a special kind of original simulation' which is factually a thought (or thinking/learning trial how to steer what is desirable) experiment, a consciousness (i.e. subtle energy bodies) engineering (what our present theoretical physics can already almost well describe), and that presently not yet understood ' original simulation' is able transform one(s)' (as his/their self likeness) and our genes (also involved due to an unfortunate mixing) from/into an until naturally gained body forms through a process of reincarnation (the latter has been until an unscientific term). That is the question of my essay whether need they - who need to understand being been their own fragmented or gathered likeness by this process - overcome themselves and us creating artificial bodies?
There is much problem with the 'control system' you write. "Finite state sequential feedback control by the Humanity to 'Steer the Future' is incomplete as Humanity is out of the infinite control system of Universe "
Yes, I agree the "Humanity is out of the (my addition here: real-time) system of Universe (my addition here: and their thoughts) ". And I think , there is only a cyclical negative feedback looping for error correction (?) which is factually too energy consuming.
There is much deel with it being the (thought) control system more refined or finally abandoned. A fully advanced human has conscious intent to steer his course, has an adequate retention to think over the possible outcome of his thoughts no to act real-time. Even further he has the capability against a quantum computer ( which can fail even if it is programmed no to do any fault it can hesitate between two of states while a human has a capacity) to decide real-time either making error or not. The latter allows much development into a right direction which can be at best balanced between two of states but keeping a human attitude and look
I don't know whether you know about Marina Shaduri works: She maintained a site which has not work yet. But you read her previous work - Life cycling of a Whole - cached on the wayback machine (here is the link just copy that http://web.archive.org/web/20090902000614/http://bioholography.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/life-cycling-of-a-whole.pdf ) and her another work The Holographic Principle and Emergence ... - InTech
I'm look forward hearing from you. Keep in tuch if you feel so, my email given in my essay.
Kind regards,
Valeria
--- if my writing will be a bit chaotic, it is because I can't see the Preview Post text ---