Dear Petio!
Thank you for your answer.
I understand your essay is a fragment of your larger works. I'm also able to understand "The General theory of Unity deals whit the idea id creation of the universe and of its separate levels (see the book)". (I'm awaiting for sending me your book).
I do not want to force you to read my essay before the date you have scheduled. However, I'd keep that important ( not only because the rating of an essay is yet out of date then, but) my essay puts out truly a different and a contemporary (even it should be coming or getting me from our future but incorporating - in the meaning of to Unite or merge with something already in existence - the past) view, and perhaps a review taken meritoriously in that regard of what the The General theory of Unity would mean as an idea of the creation of the universe.
I would like to point out to you below with a short summary of my essay - we need to finely discern between things and finally decide:
WHAT IS CREATED WHAT IS NOT! WHO DOES TRULY CREATE WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, HOW and WHY! Until we are cycling yet in a constant doubt about our God-like capabilities: Who we really are, from where we come. What we are doing. My essay title was quite advisedly written so complicated. But, the title tries to mean in brief what the essay body unfolds: Whether someone(s) (probably quite natural humans, but with an advanced knowledge about the Nature and its interrelation with thoughts about it) had already created 'a special kind of original simulation' which is factually a thought (or thinking/learning trial how to steer what is desirable) experiment, a consciousness (i.e. subtle energy bodies) engineering (what our present theoretical physics can already almost well describe), and that presently not yet understood ' original simulation' is able transform one(s)' (as his/their self likeness) and our genes (also involved due to an unfortunate mixing) from/into an until naturally gained body forms through a process of reincarnation (the latter has been until an unscientific term). That is the question of my essay whether need they - who need to understand being been their own fragmented or gathered likeness by this process - overcome themselves and us creating artificial bodies?
Petio, I didn't read over your books, however I googled and glanced over some of them. Furthermore, I noted preliminary to you I had been for almost same 25 years also initiated and having been engaged on putting together the pieces and understanding of the creational myths by the old way preserved and until understandable only for the initiated ones, who are a so called specially arrangeable souls chain of an oversoul of the same highest-self. We should know about this oversoul/him as Hermes Trismegistus/Thoth the scriptwriter of akashic and supra akashic light encoded reality frameworks, or memory fields and several of his incarnations and experiences made on several landscapes. The highest self is we also would know in his both extremity as Adonai/Jehova. All past myths, scriptures we would just understand putting those into a contemporary right context of theoretical physics of space time and time space frameworks as experienced/researched memory patterns lived out in several fragment parts of same self, and as far as unfolding M-theory tries to explain as an extension of string theory in which 11 dimensions of spacetime are identified as 7 higher-dimensions plus the 4 common dimensions (11D st = 7 hd 4D). See my little image about it in an else context in my essay. And also and there may be further hidden implications.
Yes, I also understand you because I have same stance: "I alone cannot understand all the different fields of science and that is why I invite specialists to take part in this project or at least to have the opportunity to see their own field through the general laws and principles".
Sure, this project may be very-very important connecting the past with the future (e.g. making adequate merging if possible between only two existing parallel realities, the original one and the holographically projected one). I may suppose, you may want to get financial grant for this project for which you had entered into this competition.
I however don't make sense of lucky in this competition. I participated here to speak at first time during my last 25 yrs. tremendous working behind the scenes, because I wished to disseminate essential information to those who were seriously working on to repair faults taken in our past and even our far or near future we should have commited that, but with a worse outcome.
Who need to understand, I hope they will understand.
I do not expect rating my essay, but I hope to read as soon as you can come up for a summing-up whether we need or must to work together.
My only hope truly, the eventual decision making process behind all of this discussion of a very crucial theme at the point in the possible right NOW MOMENT for getting a satisfactory grant for a proper project goal will be for our best mutual interest, keeping humanity on the right steps avoiding a worst cataclysmic event (some times probably that have already happened)
All the best for you and all of us.
You can reach me at my email given in my essay.
High regards,
Valeria
