Tom,
I applaud your application of lateral thinking to complex system interactions. I confess I was struggling to find rating credits up to page 4 but then the coherent and valid theme emerged. It did seem an interesting new take in redistribution of 'wealth' (as a wealth of resources is none the less wealth) You considered the dependency issue, though I'm not entirely convinced there's an answer, but didn't go into the question of national self esteem of states not really wanting long term help (possibly they link it to [in]dependence too). On the matter of how practical it is I have my doubts, but none the less the work needed raising.
I delayed reading yours as I was rather interested in who faced reading mine first. Yourself, Richard, or perhaps Joy. I wonder if it was fate that's pushed us together in the scoring for amusement!? You've studiously failed to comment on my model, so determinedly that it may speak more than anything you could write. I'm not concerned but must smile.
I do understand your faithful commitment to Joy's cause, but hope that doesn't drag you into scientific dishonesty. We get enough of that, spiced with arrogance. Whatever 'spin' R.G. represent I suggest Red and Green are not equivalent to emitted quantum 'spin up' and 'down'. Statistics assumes they are because otherwise it seems statisctics may be as irrelevant as Bell, so black will become white in the quantum world!
I understand why you didn't comment on the mathematical theory you asked for, it was self apparent, as the logic I present. But please do be honest in reviewing the geometrical dynamics in my essay. Once the concept of reversal of 'finding' with reversal of analyser EM field is applied then the logic re-emerges. I still feel it completes the 'theory' which Joy doesn't attempt to derive. It's certainly a 'step on' from where Bloch spheres were left. I look forward to you views. I genuinely think, however the step is made, unifying QM and SR will prove the greatest single leap mankind will ever have made, so the greatest bit of real positive 'steering' possible. I think it's really all about cause and effect.
Back to yours. There are a number I'm not scoring yet and yours is one (and I certainly won't score it down as so many have). I do also genuinely wish you well in the results. But as Christian and I proved last year, the community scoring counts for nought in the end.
Best wishes
Peter
