Charles,
I think there are many more parts to the future of humanity than a few people's interests can legitimately consider. For instance: I am profoundly against the further corruption of eco-systems (unethical allocation of resources and/or opportunities). The people and other species involved deserves broad considerations. Is it ethical to transport a miriad of species of microbes to a cooled and humidified Venus atmosphere to promote evolutionary processes toward creating an oxygen rich atmosphere (terra-forming)?
There are so many different groups of people on Earth that would have self-serving interests for the use of Venus. Combinations of Emotional, Social, logical relationships characterize each social group "evolving" to stage themselves to become involved with the related opportunities. Low-risk Significant Opportunities do not currently exist that will come to be identified in the future. These new not yet identified resources and opportunities will take on a life of their own. Hopefully, everyone involved will have the capacity to think rationally.
There are many more legitimate abstractions of relationships that are required as control variables; hundreds of thousands of them; well, really more.
Every object is a special set of considerations related to controlling the future. So providing control for as many of those objects as is practical is of primary importance. Every person, and the considered ethics of every life form and object.
Each person needs to be cultivated to be able to relate broadly to through distributed control better produce opportunities to move forward.
Me personally, I want to see a business-based research society that systematically and broadly supports space/time research initiatives; continuously.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1205.0021v1.pdf
Will manipulation of space/time be required to interact with things outside our solar system?
Do we ignore the desires of individuals who want to live in intimate contact with the forests of nature? Or ignore the developer that wants to fill his pockets without concern for nature? Everyone and every thing needs a voice and representation.
The centralized system of consideration you pose does not seem to be realistic to me, and not representative of existential considerations of many cultures.
However, now that I've beaten the tar out of the concept presented.
Your concepts in conjunction with a 8 or 9 other essays can potentially complement each other into one system of efforts that provide the overlapping of reasoning needed to broadly consider the control of everything toward a better place for humanity and the related support systems.
Too bad we don't have a Mind Mapping software tool here to pick n' place essay content into a larger system of consideration.