Video Image
Video URL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc5cRGOGIEU
Video Description
Professor Paul Davies describes the "Worm Hole Billiard Ball" paradox as if Einstein's Relativity proves not only that gravitationally affected oscillators "run slow", but as if GR also proves the existence of "time" and "different Times", (e.g. a temporal "past" and "present"). However, a careful examination of section 1 of "on the electrodynamics of moving bodies" shows Einstein provides no proof, or reason at all to convince us that extra to motion, and (dilated) change, there is also a past, and or future, or thing called "time" that "passes. Specificallly - "Electrodynamics" on "time" , states only.... [We must be] quite clear as to what we understand by "time." If, for instance, I say, "That train arrives here at 7 o'clock," I mean something like this: "The pointing of the small hand of my watch to 7 and the arrival of the train are simultaneous events." (This reasoning only "assumes" a pointer attached to a motor shows the existence and passing of a thing called time Thus,without citing other proof, all that is shown here is that "trains" and "rotating pointers" may stationary or moving, and there locations and velocities can be being compared if one wishes). Instead "Electrodyanmics" seems only to "assume" a thing called time exists, and describes its findings as if Time is proven elsewhere - however, critically, most scientist seem to assume that the demonstration that a moving light clock ticks differently to a stationary one -also- proves the existence of a past, future, and "time". This video demonstrates how "IF" Relativity only shows us spaghettification, warped space, and dilated rates of change, the "Worm Hole Billiard Ball" paradox may be resolved completely.... without any parallel universes, or Hawking's "chronology protection conjecture". Matthew Marsden (auth "A Brief History of Timelessness" )
Video Creator Bio
Matt (welcome) Marsden, is a stand up, and science geek, his ""A Brief History of Timelessness" eBook website and Youtubes attempt to explain and explore (open mindedly) a question and possibility that no other expert on "time" seems to have considered. Let alone considered and dismissed or otherwise. The key question addressed being "if matter just exists, moves, interacts and changes.... including the matter in our own minds... would this be enough to mislead us into thinking a "temporal" past, and thus a thing called time might actually "exist"? the analysis is not "metaphysical" or "phylosopical" or "sematics", but science and logic.