Dear Dr. Amrit Sorli,

I appreciate your approach to understand gravitation in terms of vacuum energy; and wish to draw your attention to one thing, that Planck Mass is a theoretically-derived quantity, obtained by equating G m m = h c . And Planck-length is a geometric-mean of Gravitational-radius and Compton-Wavelength of every particle. That is, Planck-Length is a geometric-mean of two different physical lengths, and so, not a fundamental-length. More details are described in:

"An Insight into Planck's Units"

www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2011/PP-27-04.PDF

Hope, you will find it important for your further research.

You may have already read my previous year's essay:

"On the Emergence of Physical-World from the Ultimate-Reality"

fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2001

which was based on a postulate that empty-space is not really empty. Hope, reading of this essay may trigger some useful ideas in your mind.

My latest paper submitted to journal is also based on the fact that photon's energy produces gravitational-field of negative potential-energy; and cosmological red-shift is a process of "filling" that gravitational potential-well from the positive energy of the photon. I wellcome your comments at my e-mail address: tank.hasmukh@rediffmail.com, hasmukh.tank1@gmail.com

Wishing you grand success in your research,

Yours sincerely,

Hasmukh K. Tank

Dear Amrit,

I forgot to paste the link of my latest paper referred above, it is at:

http://vixra.org/abs/1502.0104

Yours sincerely,

Hasmukh K. Tank

Dear Dr. Tank

I read your paper in Progress of Physics. Original work on the subject of Planck units. For me Max Planck was equal to Albert Einstein. We are now getting together their results. Energy density of quantum vacuum is future of physics. Explaining mass of elementary particles is pure failor, which will be recognized soon by entire scientific community.

yours amrit

www.fopi.infoAttachment #1: 5_Gravity_originates_from_variable_energy_density_of_quantum_vacuum.pdfAttachment #2: 3_Relativistic_energy_and_mass_originate.pdf

Amrit Sorli,

Nice work on your essay. I completely agree that "Time has only a mathematical existence, past, present and future are only a mathematical realities" and "Time travels are out of question, one can travel in space only and time is duration of its motion". I think I have a good model, which I posted at http://vixra.org/abs/1402.0045 called the space-time-motion model, which you may appreciate if you get a chance to read it.

Most of these essays are very thought provoking but some are hard to read. I went a different route and wrote what I consider a more entertaining twist - sort of a blend of Knights of the Round Table and Lord of the Rings (See Doctors of the Ring - The Power of Merlin the Mathematician to Transform Chaos into Consciousness). It is based on my space-time-motion model, which I invite you to read and let me know what you think (email to stjohntheodore@gmail.com). Of course, I also invite you to read and rate Doctors of the Ring if you get the chance.

Respectfully,

Ted St. John

Dear John, i will read all that, thanks, at the moment I'm full in quantum vacuum technology.

yours Amrit

a month later

Dear Mr. Sorli,

I thought that your engrossing essay was exceptionally well written and I do hope that it fares well in the competition.

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

2 years later
Write a Reply...