Thank you for reading my essay, I read them all, and I voted for those who deserve.

I reread your essay, and it is interesting, if I understand well, what you say that the mathematics is only a means to obtain a computer calculus (or in old days hand calculation) of a real phenomenon, so that if we use the brain to create a physical equation then a calculation analogous to organic computation (quantum computer simulation, parallel computer, etc.) could get interesting results to obtain physical equations.

I think that mathematics is pure imagination, pure symbolic play, and the "shut up and calculate" is - for me - a mathematical point of view (you have the game rules, follow them).

The three filter paradox is interesting because it can extend the logic (the filter like brackets), and with different routes I had thought that the logic can be represented by bracketing of symbols (if the elementary operation are binary and asymmetric).

Is it possible quantum calculus, with lasers and semitransparent glass and filters, using Zeilinger apparatus with multiple layers?

A good essay make you think, so your essay is a good essay.

Domenico

Domenico,

Shark time as they pull you down, so I am revisiting essays I've read to assure I've rated them. I find that I rated yours on 4/11, rating it as one I could immediately relate to. I hope you get a chance to look at mine: http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2345 as time evaporates.

Jim

12 days later

I am thinking that if it is true that the Gravitoelectromagnetism is an approximation of Einstein field equation, then it can be true that the Maxwell's equation are an approximation of a similar field equation so that the quantum field theory of a Maxwell's equation is possible because of an approximation with low energy (renormalization is possible), but it could be possible a theory without renormalization using the field equation for the electromagnetism, and the same could be true for the Einstein field equation.

13 days later

I am thinking that if there is a complete equivalence in the relativistic equation for gravitational field and electromagnetic field, then an Alcubierre drive can be built with electromagnetic field: if a spaceship is charged (for example with an emission of electrons), then it is equivalent to a mass in a gravitational field (charge-mass equivalence), so that the charged ship can be moved by an electric field similar to the warp-field (for example an emission of electron behind the spaceship, and an emission of protons in front of the spaceship), and it should operate at orders of magnitude better than the original idea (because of the differences in the forces).

The energy for the emission can be obtained by a nuclear power plant, or batteries that store solar energy or microwave energy received by Earth, or dozens of other ways: it seem to work.

Write a Reply...