Essay Abstract

The differential equation of the accelerating electrons gives a linear potential change in the reference frame of the moving charges. The mysterious property of the matter that the electric potential difference is self maintained by the accelerating electrons in the electric current gives a clear explanation to the basic sentence of the relativity that is the velocity of the light is the maximum velocity of the electromagnetic matter. The accelerating electrons explain not only the Maxwell Equations and the Special Relativity, but the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation, the wave particle duality and the electron's spin also, building the bridge between the Classical and Relativistic Quantum Theories. The changing acceleration of the electrons explains the created negative electric field of the magnetic induction, the electromagnetic inertia, the changing relativistic mass and the Gravitational Force, giving a Unified Theory of the physical forces. Taking into account the Planck Distribution Law of the electromagnetic oscillators also, we can explain the electron/proton mass rate and the Weak and Strong Interactions.

Author Bio

M. Sc., Physics at Eötvös Loránd University. The SOA Category Winner of the first Connected Systems Developer Competition of Microsoft in San Francisco 2005 with the Next Generation Court System - achieving also the Best Enterprise Mission Critical System Award FY 2005 of Bill Gates. Artificial Intelligence Researcher participated on the 1st World Computer Chess Championship in Stockholm, 1974. International Master of Chess and was among the Top 100 Players of the World in 1987.

Download Essay PDF File

18 days later
5 days later

Dear Sir,

Your opening sentence itself is surprising. Field is a region of space where, on entering, we feel differently. The difference is a kind of force and according to the nature of the force; we designate the field (electric, magnetic, etc). When electrons are made to move by switching on (removing the blockade), it flows like blocked water when it finds an opening. The rate of flow depends upon the environmental properties. Since everything is constituted of atoms, the environment for the electron is homogeneous, and it moves at constant speed, which obviously is the maximum speed for any particle with mass. That the accelerated electrons create a charge density distribution and maintain a decreasing potential change along the wire is also obvious. The disturbance created by the electron generates complementary inertia of restoration (elasticity), which closes in to restore the original position. This causes the magnetic effects. The electric potential difference is self maintained by the accelerating electrons in the electric current like the bow shock effect when a boat moves in water. Regarding relativity, you are welcome to read our essay. So what is new?

Electromagnetism is an intra-body effect that is strictly monogamous. You cannot have electromagnetic effect between bodies at a distance. Similarly, one electron interacts with one proton at any time. It has to be ejected to interact with any other proton. Gravitation is an inter-body effect that is always polygamous. Electromagnetism acts only through differential density within the base or ground. There is no such restriction for gravitation, which acts by treating all bodies as point particles. Then how can you say; "gravitation is also electromagnetic effect".

Your experiment shows only the obvious: strength of electromagnetic field peters out over distance at a known rate.

We have waited for over a century in the hope of finding extra-dimensions. How many centuries we have to wait before we discard the idea of graviton?

Regards,

basudeba

    12 days later

    I think that most of us here have a reasonably good command of statistics. So, as is usually the case, there are two explanations. Maybe it is just a fluke (both the number of ratings and the high value). On the other hand, when something deviates from the expectation at this many sigma, most people will conclude that there is another explanation.

    Did you read what the judges of the competition where looking for in submissions?

    Interesting essay, but irrelevant to the competition in my view.

      The judges thought it is relevant, otherwise it wasn't here.

      5 days later

      Sabine Hossenfelder wrote: One Hundred Years of Relativity

      http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/einstein-relativity-quantum-physics-by-sabine-hossenfelder-2015-03

      a month later

      George,

      I found your essay easy to read and understand, and it included good and valuable conceptions, ideas and insights. In particular I consider the popular conception of electricity and magnetism to be little beyond the stone age! The shame is that it's so central to the whole physical universe.

      I see some think the essay is 'off topic'. Strictly it may be, but it's well written clear and important so I feel certainly shouldn't be languishing at the bottom. I hope my score helps. I feel mankind's biggest problem is not so much finding answers but incorporating them in doctrinal theory. New sound insights like those you describe will then be rebuffed by theoretical entrenchment.

      I don't quite agree with all your ideas but do find over 90% may be one valid description of mechanisms viewable from different aspects. I for instance, have produced a physical dynamic model consistent with your key points, leading to similar but also further consistent insights and conclusions, resolving for instance CP violations etc from the same mechanism giving 'time dependent' cosmic redshift NOT from accelerating expansion. It's consistent with the helix dynamic (3 plane OAM) of previous essays. If you have 9 minutes do check out this new video.

      Cosmic redshift mechanism... etc.

      Of course I also hope you'll read and score my essay, as I'm sure you'll see it's correctness and important implications. Do please comment and ask questions

      Very best of luck.

      Peter