Dear Mr. Castel,

I thought that your engrossing essay was exceptionally well written and I do hope that it fares well in the competition.

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

12 days later

Dear Rafael,

Your attitude is interesting.

"By the empirical evidence, there are two fundamental processes. They are motion and duration."

But follow further wrong:

"The laws of nature basically consider six fundamental essences. The 3-d space dimension, the one-time dimension d, motion, duration, the substance of existence, and the instance of existence."

Dimensions are not essences.

In my essay, you can see that I'm getting results, with 3 essences and without dimensions. Dimensions are not needed at all.

Regards,

Branko

4 days later

Dear Re Castel,

Thanks for essay which suckles on the sap of "past masters".Your inclination to;not only approximate but further the preoccupations of Newton and Einsteen vis-a-vis their interpretations of the transformation equations is a step in the right direction.

I share your view that we cannot underestimate the possibiliy that a much more deeper analysis of the fundamental equations could predispose a more profound scientific understanding of the maths-physics nexus.Following the trend of your arguments, I quite agree that "the mathematics in our physics may correctly be considered only according to the idea of purely the motion transformations".

Keep on flourishing.

Lloyd Tamarapreye Okoko.