Dear Sir,
There is a tendency in these columns to read essays only of friends and rate them high and ignore all other essays and rate them low. Hence thanks for reading our essay. Also only people who have full confidence in their theories tell us to read their essays, because we do not go by name, but content. Thus, before reading, you have made us somewhat biased in favor of your essay. We will certainly read your essay and comment soon. We were writing a paper for the Gravity Research Foundation and another for another International Conference to be held this month. Hence after reading about 50 essays, we stopped reading other essays here. We will soon start reading and rating other essays.
Newton was not exactly wrong about gravity. But he did not realize the total implication of application of his second law to the gravitational equation: g = F/m. Gravity is not the only force acting here, as you see two forces in both sides of the equation. It only accelerates - changes velocity induced by an existing force when it surpasses that force (changed the velocity of the apple from relative zero to motion and again relative zero when it exceeded the force by which the apple was held to its stem). The two zero relative velocities imply stabilization after destabilization. Thus, gravity stabilizes - not attracts. It is related to momentum and not mass. It also implies that at the universal level, there is only one primordial force, which moves all. Just like the same force creates different momentum when acting on different masses, we see different emergent forces.
Transverse waves are background invariant by definition. Since light is a transverse wave, it is background invariant. Einstein's ether-less relativity is not supported by Maxwell's Equations nor the Lorentz Transformations, both of which are medium (ether) based. Thus, nonobservance of ether drag (as in Michelson-Morley experiments) cannot serve to ultimately disprove background structure. Einsteinian space-time curvature calculations were based on vacuum, i.e. on a medium without any gravitational properties (since it has no mass). In a material medium (which space certainly is), it will have a profound effect on space-time geometry, making the gravitational constant different for different local densities (explained later). If Sun and Earth attract each other towards their present positions S and E respectively, the two forces balance in each other's orbit. If both bodies move with uniform relative velocity, the forces, being oppositely directed, would cancel each other. But since both are moving with different velocities, and forces exerted by each on the other takes some time to travel from one to the other, there will be a net force.
While gravity interacts polygamously with every other body, other interactions originate as intra-body monogamous entanglements. Strength of their relationship varies according to their energy level, making four couples of proximity-distance functions that vary according to the mass and energies involved and the local field density. The proximity-proximity variable is strong interaction. The proximity-distance variable (in-phase bonding) is weak interaction. The distance-proximity variable is electromagnetic interaction. The distance-distance variable (out-of-phase bonding) is beta decay. The inter-body variables are gravitational interaction. All displacements are associated with generation of heat energy. But all interactions are not associated with high energy except strong, weak, electromagnetic interaction and radioactive disintegration. Like magnetism, gravitational interaction is associated with low energy - hence belongs to a different class.
Regards,
basudeba
mbasudeba@gmail.com