Dear Colin,
You write:
„I want to write a program to explore your findings in more detail."
Google translation
I think my simple table in Excel, it is quite a good program.
I suggest you use it the way that you add new levels. For example, You can add the level with mass responsible for the quantum mechanical oscillator (that is very easy). Then, you add levels that would explain the red shift (that is not easy). Your great contribution can be to prove / disprove my formula (7). In my original table I got over 100 levels, all of which give accurate results.
„I was unaware of the work of Roger Boscovich in the 1700s on which some of your work is based."
Actually, I'm on Boskovic paid attention when I've finished my original concept.
„Newton's philosophy put experimentation first while Boscovich went the other way, trying to reach conclusions from pure reason which might then be tested by experiment."
It is very well your sighting.
„A shortcoming with your essay is that there is no explanation of how you arrived at the extraordinary results."
For this there are several reasons:
-Lack of time, because I do everything myself, and only after his 58 years of life.
-Nobody wants to publish views on fundamental issues of the unknown authors, and even without a PhD and belonging, according to them, the appropriate research institution.
-I prefer to use my time to determine a correct relationship with my concept, than to try to convince reviewers that I am right.
-That's why I decided to take a third way (also accepted in science), that from my concept, produce and publish a large number of accurate predictions. I would be grateful if you could help in this way.
„It may be that some of Boscovich's unfamiliar method of reasoning would be unconvincing to modern readers. „
Galileo, Newton Boskovic used the method of geometry that is for their time probably was familiar to them. I also did not understand more than 5% of Boscovich's theory but I realized it was clear reasoning came to the results that were later proven closer Bohr, Planck, Thomson.
„To assess the gravitational effect of a body like the Earth on measurement, please refer to Table 1 of my unpublished paper of 2010, ref [13] in my essay."
At [13], there is no Table.
I think it was Einstein's GR was remarkable attempt in the 20th century. He himself had worked the last 20 years of his life on more accurate and integrative theory. It's not right, as geeks appropriated GR and from their misunderstanding made dogma. The problem arose when geeks began to produce small geeks who are in this competition dominantly influential.
I think that G should be constant by definition, as it is in natural units of measure, G=1.
Regards,
Branko