TianmingRen in the Cloud by KoGuan Leo

I post my comment I made in your site.

Dear Jacek,

I congratulate as you wrote a brilliant essay. I enjoyed reading it from the beginning until the ending.You described your theory well and I would say it is NOt contradictory to KQID but it is KQID in different clothing with its different symbols, and story. Beneath it, we are in complete agreement. You should read carefully my essay again and you will discover similarity like below statement in which KQID has identical proposition.

You wrote:

"We propose the evolution of information concept. To explain it very shortly, we have to apply the theory of Darwinism beyond its original sphere of organic evolution on Earth. The organic evolution refers to some pieces of DNA (a kind of information) and not to species (what is the most common misconception). Going further beyond information carried by pieces of DNA (that are sets of molecules), we observe only the waves (information) possessing long-term existence and stability."

If I may add we must fight for diversity, tolerance and inclusivity and we must fight against uniformity, intolerance and exclusivity. We are for "harmonious unity" or unity in diversity of ideas, races, languages, cultures and civilizations,

Best wishes and hope you will do well and I vote according to my favorable view,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment on Sara Walker's essay in this thread

Dear Sara,

Yes, I agree with your conclusion stated below: "Our ability to use mathematics to describe, and more importantly manipulate, the natural world may not be an anomaly or "trick", but instead could be an intimate facet of the structure of physical reality." In my essay TianmingRen in the Cloud, I advanced that the initial state: everything is connected that bit is it, and the final state and all in between: everything is still connected that it is bit. Hope you can comment and rate my essay.

Best of luck,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment here

Dear Torsten,

Great essay! I learned from you. Very enjoyable reading, brief and yet packed with information. You covered Turing, Plato and many others. I also covered Turing and Plato. I also covered number theory briefly. I also concur with Pythagoras that "all things are numbers" and in KQID, it is Einstein complex coordinates Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). However, I started with a premise that everything, yes everything is infinite qbit(00, 1, -1) or Qbit(00, +, -). The infinite contains both finites and infinites. Similarly, finite contains infinites. Because both are governed by infinite law(KQID). Finite law cannot govern infinite entity like the Qbit. Furthermore, as you pointed out everything including the Qbit or our Creator is evolving. Please review and comment on my essay.

Best wishes for the contest and I vote your essay highly,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment here

Dear Jonathan,

I am glad you were able to finish your fine piece. I totally agree with you especially on Hooft's explaination. I totally agree with him except I do think Qbit is the smallest possible and the largest possible Multiverse. Qbit is the atomic unit that describes its bigger self. To quote your quotation from the great physicist Hooft: "What does the calculating? Do we need Planck-sized atoms of space?" And he said "We don't need atoms of space or whatever, because the laws of nature do the calculating for us." I do believe information is everything and information is describing information. Alternatively, math describes math universe. It is a self referential system of information that is bootstrapping itself into what we feel and see as our Existence. You have been the last 30 years as an independent researcher to view this new paradigm of math.

I invite you to review mine and as usual you wrote a great essay and I rate it accordingly.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

I repost here

Dear Christian,

As usual you wrote an interesting essay. I also believe with your conclusion remark that "Mathematics is Truth instead of Trick". However, I do subscribe that Geometry is also a "Force" like Newton's gravitational Force. In my essay, KQID prescribes that Existence is geometrical and it is a mere Einstein complex coordinate points(numbers as in Pythagoras') or in this mathematical expression Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). I am surely derived my theory from a very different paradigm however the outcomes must be about the same especially in our experiences and scientific experiments. KQID must also be able to explain and predict more than the dominant paradigm of today.

As usual, well deserved high score and best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Jonathan,

Thanks for your generous comment. Thanks for your friendship. Yes, I advocate philosophy in action. KQID advances even beyond Tecmark's MUH, because KQID prescribes that our creator itself is the omni-mathematician Qbit (00, +, -) who is applying the Zeroth Law of Existence to compute, simulate and project its mathematical objects/creatures from its zeroth dimension to 3D time in time (4D of time dimensions) in which the 3D time is moving perpendicularly/orthogonally with time in time in the zeroth dimension. Everything is bit in the form of KQID IΨ(CTE) as Shakespearian meme actors acting in our world's holographic and relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). Therefore, Existence IΨ(CTE) is the fetus of time Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) and time is pregnant with Existences or mathematical objects/living things.

Truly yours,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Torsten,

Thank you for your comment and vote. I am especially happy that you like my First Law and you think it is logical and information is conserved. The First Law is the byproduct of the Zeroth Law, so if the First Law is wrong, the Zeroth Law is falsified. If the First Law is correct, the Zeroth Law must be also correct and verified. Because the First and Zeroth Law are really one law; each is the byproduct of the other.

Thank you,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Christian,

Thank you for your comments and questions which are penetrating and profound.

1. You wrote : "I agree that maths is truth." KQID prescribes paradoxical Existence that it is fiction but real. Hence the math is truly mapping one to one to this holographic Existence that is fiction but real. In short, Math is truth in fiction. Interestingly Dr. Richard Shoup's essay : "Emergence of Space and Time from Ultimately Simple Mathematics" has expressed this fundamental paradoxical of nature that KQid shares. I highly recommend to read it.

2. You asked: "If our 4-D Universe is a holographic Existence, the Ancestor Qbit should be a 5-D world. Am I correct? My humble answer: there is no need to have the 5-D to map the 4-D, KQID prescribes that we are actually in the zeroth-D in time that is living in the zeroth-D. As it is the zeroth D, it is nowhere but everywhere, the Euclid's point as well as Huishi's point. That is why the projection of our holographic Existence comes from the zeroth-D to 1-D to 2-D to 3-D time in time(the 4th D is the zeroth-D.) Yes it is 4D world but the 1st--D is the zeroth-D. In other words, Existence is existing/living in the zeroth-D time, Minkowski's Multiverse timeline (Lm) as in Ψ(iτLx,y,ż, LM)

3. You asked: "It seems that KQID's principle comprises the principle of information preserving. This also explains why you replace "Big Bang" with "Bit Bang"." My humble answer: yes absolutely. It is our Ancestor Qbit (00, +, -) is unfolding into all things where ΙΨ(CTE ) is Shakespearian meme actor with consciousness, time and energy who is acting in our relativistic of hologram Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,ż, LM). Newton seemed to say that no need for our Creator's hypothesis for his laws, and yet we know he believed that God intervenes time to time to correct the chaos of 8 planets orbiting our Sun. We must not be afraid to bring about the scientific Creator as long as this model must subject to Xuan Yuan-Popper's falsification that this model works all the time without fails at any place.

4. Your asked: "What does it happen before the first 10^-147seconds? In other words, does KQID theory remove the initial singularity?" In KQID, every point Ψ(iτLx,y,ż) is a singulatity in 0-D that is living in absolute digital time T-moment ≤10^-1000 seconds. In short, KQID states that before the first 10^-147seconds is the T-moment ≤10^-1000 seconds ( closed to zero but not zero). From the point of 10^-1000 seconds to 10^57m of 10^-147seconds. Another way to put it, the point is the absolute digital time T, the unwinding clock as the Bit Bang.

I am really happy to get your comments and questions and we have logical and rational discourses. I welcome our community to join in, for that I am grateful.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Christian,

1. You have the habit of asking so demanding questions that no one on Earth and also in our universe can answer these questions except KQID. Only ToE can answer what is before the Bit Bang or before the first 10^1000seconds and before the first baby universe 10^-57meters. As I pointed out earlier, KQID is the only theory now that can calculate the first moment of the Bit Bang within 10^-147seconds, with 10^136 K temperature and with variable initial light speed of 10^90m/s that dropped precipitously to 10^14m/s in one second. First, answering your question on singularity, every point Qbit is a singularity that is living per absolute digital time T-moment and then it is ebolving according to KQID Five Laws.

2. KQID prescribes our universe is a super-cluster galaxies among many in our one Multiverse following the so called the Anthropic Principle, because our Ancestor Qbit computes, simulates and projects all Existence/Multiverse. We are living in this universe because our universe by chance obeying the Five Laws harbors us, TianmingRen in the Cloud. Yes, our Qbit is NOT capable to create and distribute only our universe by specific "intelligent design" but only through the Five Laws to create and distribute Multiverse in which one of a super-cluster galaxies contained intelligent life form like us. This phenomenon is by chance according to the Five Laws, not by religious intelligent design argument nor "many worlds" quantum interpretation. Therefore what is before our universe is among many possibilities: 1. A random quantum fluctuation in the vacuum of our Multiverse; 2. An earlier universe collapsed and rebounded universe; 3. Collision among super cluster galaxies or a newly formed super massive universal mass black hole that time reversed itself into a white hole that is inflating as we have observed as it is becoming our universe.

Thanks for your trust by assigning me the toughest questions in our universe and giving me the opportunity to answer them.

Gratefully yours,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment on Ken Wharton's great essay here

Dear Ken,

Great read and very well argued piece and very instructive discussion on time. I really enjoyed your craft. If you allow me to indulge myself to integrate your concept with KQID below. You wrote on option B that I choose to discuss: "(B) Only t is ordinary time; T is not." KQID: time t (iτLx,y,z) is relativistic times according to KQID relativistic and holographic Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm), whereas T (Lm) is absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000seconds in which everything is in the state of block NOW where time-past-present-future merged. And T is the clock rate of our Existence computed, simulated and projected by Qbit (00, +, -) as the omni-mathematician, the Grand Wizard Merlin, Planck's matrix of all matter and KQID-Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory. This hologram Existence is the 3-D relativistic (t) as the fetus of time, and T is permanently pregnant with 3-D time as Existence. In other words, t is inside T and we only experience relative times in 3D time simply because T is ticking regularly in asymmetrical Minkowski's Multiverse timeline as history. it is really 3-D in the 0-D or Lm(Tn...) where space is 3-D time moving perpendicularly in 0-D T. Yes, as you inferred Existence is infinite, that requires infinite math and physics that is deeply paradoxical in its nature (see Richard Shoup's essay) and it must follow its own self-consistent "mathematical rules that seem strange and esoteric to us humans."

Extremely fine jewelry craftsmanship, I would vote highly and please comment and rate my piece.

Thank you,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's profound essay here

Dear Richard,

Excellent and profound essay! I enjoyed reading yours. I do believe we need at least two to start an exchange between two fundamental element that is actual one element that splits itself up into two so that it can evolve and exchange with each other to fo-evolve and so one. It is bootstrapping itself. It is pure magic.

I agree with you that "Mathematics is generative, dynamic, and alive." Yours deserved a high score and please look at mine and yes it is true we are searching for the fundamental truth.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's great essay here

Dear Richard,

Xuan Yuan about 4712 years ago already stated in The Four Canons, 11 explains how things come into beings, from the "Void" without distinction: "All things had been one whole before the Heaven and Earth split... with no distinction of day and night, Yin and Yang. Since Yin and Yang were not separated yet, it was not possible to name anything. Now that one is divided into two: Yin and Yang, and the four seasons distinguished... become the norm. The enlightened take it as the Dao, which is profound and subtle, and follow it in whatever they do. Following the Dao is the same as handling the relationship between the female and the male. When there is attraction between the two, then follows the union of the assertive and the receptive. They complement each other and give birth to new forms."

Here another quotation from Zhuangzi Derived his thought from Xuan Yuan more than 2000 years before him that describes how a difference causes Existence, here is the quotation for your review: "Heaven, Earth, and I were produced together, and all things and I are one. Since they are one, can there be speech about them? But since they are spoken of as one, must there not be room for speech? One and Speech are two; two and one are three. Going on from this (in our enumeration), the most skillful reckoner cannot reach (the end of the necessary numbers), and how much less can ordinary people do so! Therefore from non-existence we proceed to existence till we arrive at three; proceeding from existence to existence, to how many should we reach? Let us abjure such procedure, and simply rest here." See Legge, James. trans. Zhuangzi, "The Adjustment of Controversies"; See also Watson, Burton. trans. Zhuangzi: Basic Writing, "All things equal."

Yes, something more fundamental is change/difference itself as the source of Existence. However, they did not have the latest knowledge that we have, they had no theory with equations and numbers derived from those equations. KQID fixed these problems and stated that Existence has one Source Qbit(00, , -), one Principle Giving first Taking later; one theory bit is it; one Zeroth equation with one normalized number "1"; and one quantum entangled Existence.

Thank you for your great contribution, I hope I can add mine.

Truly yours,

Leo KoGuan