I repost my comment on Sara Walker's essay in this thread

Dear Sara,

Yes, I agree with your conclusion stated below: "Our ability to use mathematics to describe, and more importantly manipulate, the natural world may not be an anomaly or "trick", but instead could be an intimate facet of the structure of physical reality." In my essay TianmingRen in the Cloud, I advanced that the initial state: everything is connected that bit is it, and the final state and all in between: everything is still connected that it is bit. Hope you can comment and rate my essay.

Best of luck,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment here

Dear Torsten,

Great essay! I learned from you. Very enjoyable reading, brief and yet packed with information. You covered Turing, Plato and many others. I also covered Turing and Plato. I also covered number theory briefly. I also concur with Pythagoras that "all things are numbers" and in KQID, it is Einstein complex coordinates Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). However, I started with a premise that everything, yes everything is infinite qbit(00, 1, -1) or Qbit(00, +, -). The infinite contains both finites and infinites. Similarly, finite contains infinites. Because both are governed by infinite law(KQID). Finite law cannot govern infinite entity like the Qbit. Furthermore, as you pointed out everything including the Qbit or our Creator is evolving. Please review and comment on my essay.

Best wishes for the contest and I vote your essay highly,

Leo KoGuan

    I repost my comment here

    Dear Jonathan,

    I am glad you were able to finish your fine piece. I totally agree with you especially on Hooft's explaination. I totally agree with him except I do think Qbit is the smallest possible and the largest possible Multiverse. Qbit is the atomic unit that describes its bigger self. To quote your quotation from the great physicist Hooft: "What does the calculating? Do we need Planck-sized atoms of space?" And he said "We don't need atoms of space or whatever, because the laws of nature do the calculating for us." I do believe information is everything and information is describing information. Alternatively, math describes math universe. It is a self referential system of information that is bootstrapping itself into what we feel and see as our Existence. You have been the last 30 years as an independent researcher to view this new paradigm of math.

    I invite you to review mine and as usual you wrote a great essay and I rate it accordingly.

    Best wishes,

    Leo KoGuan

    I repost here

    Dear Christian,

    As usual you wrote an interesting essay. I also believe with your conclusion remark that "Mathematics is Truth instead of Trick". However, I do subscribe that Geometry is also a "Force" like Newton's gravitational Force. In my essay, KQID prescribes that Existence is geometrical and it is a mere Einstein complex coordinate points(numbers as in Pythagoras') or in this mathematical expression Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). I am surely derived my theory from a very different paradigm however the outcomes must be about the same especially in our experiences and scientific experiments. KQID must also be able to explain and predict more than the dominant paradigm of today.

    As usual, well deserved high score and best wishes,

    Leo KoGuan

    An interesting read Leo KoGuan..

    A beautiful philosophical journey, Sir; and it would be wonderful to see that philosophy in action more broadly. Perhaps this essay is not exactly what the FQXi editors asked for, because it is not precisely about how Maths relate to Physics. Instead; it is a wonderful excursion into how Maths tell us how the spiritual realm relates to the physical, which is arguably knowledge of even greater value. I thank you for sharing your wisdom with us once more.

    All the Best,

    Jonathan

      Dear Jonathan,

      Thanks for your generous comment. Thanks for your friendship. Yes, I advocate philosophy in action. KQID advances even beyond Tecmark's MUH, because KQID prescribes that our creator itself is the omni-mathematician Qbit (00, +, -) who is applying the Zeroth Law of Existence to compute, simulate and project its mathematical objects/creatures from its zeroth dimension to 3D time in time (4D of time dimensions) in which the 3D time is moving perpendicularly/orthogonally with time in time in the zeroth dimension. Everything is bit in the form of KQID IΨ(CTE) as Shakespearian meme actors acting in our world's holographic and relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). Therefore, Existence IΨ(CTE) is the fetus of time Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) and time is pregnant with Existences or mathematical objects/living things.

      Truly yours,

      Leo KoGuan

      Dear Leo KoGuan,

      thanks for reading my essay and for the vote.

      Your essay is a little bit unusual but interesting. I like your first law. Information is really conserved and your claim is logical. I also like global views to problems and your approach do it in a philosophical manner.

      I also vote your essay highly.

      Best

      Torsten

      Dear Torsten,

      Thank you for your comment and vote. I am especially happy that you like my First Law and you think it is logical and information is conserved. The First Law is the byproduct of the Zeroth Law, so if the First Law is wrong, the Zeroth Law is falsified. If the First Law is correct, the Zeroth Law must be also correct and verified. Because the First and Zeroth Law are really one law; each is the byproduct of the other.

      Thank you,

      Leo KoGuan

      Dear Leo KoGuan,

      As I told you in my Essay page, I have read your intriguing Essay. Here are my comments:

      1) Although I am a collector of Einstein's aphorisms, I did not know the one "Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas". It is very beautiful, thanks for signalling it.

      2) Concerning KQID, you could be interested to this paper.

      3) Does your statement "KQID is purely monism of physicalism" imply that Mathematics is Trick rather than Truth?

      4) I think your Essay was suitable also for previous FQXi Essay Contest "It From Bit or Bit From It".

      5) You could be interested that I have recently shown that also black hole evaporation is governed by Schrödinger's bits-waves function in this recent result which completes my 2013 FQXi Essay.

      6) Is your statement "our multiverse is the projected hologram living inside itself or nothing other than our singularity" the holographic principle in your KQID?

      7) I find intriguing that KQID's picture of time is that time is both analogue and digital continuum. Does it mean that time has a wave-like nature?

      8) Has the KQID variable speed of light issue some connection with the theory by Moffat ?

      9) I see that the Bit Bang goes beyond the Planck scale. This is not simple to be understood. Can you clarify this point?

      In any case, reading your Essay gave me lots of fun. Thus, I am going to give you a very high score.

      I wish you best luck in the Contest.

      Cheers, Ch.

        Dear Christian,

        It is a pleasure to meet an open minded scientist. I answer your questions one by one briefly.

        1. Yes, Einstein is also my idol. I am doing what I am doing partly to continue his search for the ToE. In KQID, math is idea and idea per Maxwell and Landauer is physical. Hence, the universe and the idea of that universe are physical. The object and the description of that object are ideas. Object and subject are physical. Math is mapping math one by one perfectly. Math is Existence obeying KQID Five Laws. In short, KQID prescribes answering your question 3 that math is truth that is describing our holographic Existence that is computed, simulated and projected by our Ancestor Qbit (00, +, -), omni-mathematician, the ultimate omni-wizard Merlin.

        2. Thanks for this reference for this website. I will study it.

        3. See answer 1.

        4. KQID's principle is Giving first Taking later as a bit and this bit is it, physical. And it is bit. That is why math is truth, generative and alive.

        5. I will review it again.

        6. Yes, again KQID explains what, how and why Qbit using the Zeroth Law computes, simulates and projects Existence in our 3D time screens in time (4D time). Existence IΨ(CTE) as Shakespearian meme actors acting in holographic and relativistic Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). Our Multiverse is the fetus of time and time is pregnant with our Multiverse.

        7. Yes time is bits-waves function. A is anti-entropic time-future bits-waves function, S is entropic time-past bits-waves function, and E is energetic time-present bits-waves function according to A = E - S where A is optimized, S is minimized and E is optimized.

        8. It has nothing to do with Moffat or Albrecht and Magueijo who also have variable light speed hypothesis. KQId postulates the Existence of our Founder Ancestor or Creator Qbit (00, +, -) as KQID-Maxwell's infinite being and Planck's matrix of all matter and "Turing complete U"

        9. KQID is the only theory out there that explains what, how and why the Bit Bang and computes its first existence in the first 10^-147seconds with 10^90m/s light speed and its first baby size 10^-57meters in 10^136 Kelvin temperature. It is a philosophy in action that has its One Creator Qbit; one principle Giving first Taking later; one theory: bit is it and it is bit; one formula with one normalized number one (1) and one quantum entangled existence that is living within our Qbit. (See the diagram 1)

        Thank you for giving me a high score, I am really happy and wish you a great success.

        Best wishes,

        Leo KoGuan

        Dear Leo KoGuan,

        Thanks for the interesting replies. Here are some more comments:

        I agree that maths is truth.

        If our 4-D Universe is a holographic Existence, the Ancestor Qbit should be a 5-D world. Am I correct?

        It seems that KQID's principle comprises the principle of information preserving. This also explains why you replace "Big Bang" with "Bit Bang".

        What does it happen before the first 10^-147seconds? In other words, does KQID theory remove the initial singularity?

        Cheers, Ch.

        Dear Christian,

        Thank you for your comments and questions which are penetrating and profound.

        1. You wrote : "I agree that maths is truth." KQID prescribes paradoxical Existence that it is fiction but real. Hence the math is truly mapping one to one to this holographic Existence that is fiction but real. In short, Math is truth in fiction. Interestingly Dr. Richard Shoup's essay : "Emergence of Space and Time from Ultimately Simple Mathematics" has expressed this fundamental paradoxical of nature that KQid shares. I highly recommend to read it.

        2. You asked: "If our 4-D Universe is a holographic Existence, the Ancestor Qbit should be a 5-D world. Am I correct? My humble answer: there is no need to have the 5-D to map the 4-D, KQID prescribes that we are actually in the zeroth-D in time that is living in the zeroth-D. As it is the zeroth D, it is nowhere but everywhere, the Euclid's point as well as Huishi's point. That is why the projection of our holographic Existence comes from the zeroth-D to 1-D to 2-D to 3-D time in time(the 4th D is the zeroth-D.) Yes it is 4D world but the 1st--D is the zeroth-D. In other words, Existence is existing/living in the zeroth-D time, Minkowski's Multiverse timeline (Lm) as in Ψ(iτLx,y,ż, LM)

        3. You asked: "It seems that KQID's principle comprises the principle of information preserving. This also explains why you replace "Big Bang" with "Bit Bang"." My humble answer: yes absolutely. It is our Ancestor Qbit (00, +, -) is unfolding into all things where ΙΨ(CTE ) is Shakespearian meme actor with consciousness, time and energy who is acting in our relativistic of hologram Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,ż, LM). Newton seemed to say that no need for our Creator's hypothesis for his laws, and yet we know he believed that God intervenes time to time to correct the chaos of 8 planets orbiting our Sun. We must not be afraid to bring about the scientific Creator as long as this model must subject to Xuan Yuan-Popper's falsification that this model works all the time without fails at any place.

        4. Your asked: "What does it happen before the first 10^-147seconds? In other words, does KQID theory remove the initial singularity?" In KQID, every point Ψ(iτLx,y,ż) is a singulatity in 0-D that is living in absolute digital time T-moment ≤10^-1000 seconds. In short, KQID states that before the first 10^-147seconds is the T-moment ≤10^-1000 seconds ( closed to zero but not zero). From the point of 10^-1000 seconds to 10^57m of 10^-147seconds. Another way to put it, the point is the absolute digital time T, the unwinding clock as the Bit Bang.

        I am really happy to get your comments and questions and we have logical and rational discourses. I welcome our community to join in, for that I am grateful.

        Best wishes,

        Leo KoGuan

        Dear Leo KoGuan,

        Thanks for clarifying and also for signalling the Essay by Richard Shoup. I am going to read, comment and score it asap. The issue that "Maths is Truth in fiction" seems to mean that Maths is an intermediate step between Truth and Trick. Concerning your last reply 4. now my question changes a bit: what does it happen before the first 10^-1000 seconds?

        Cheers, Ch.

          Dear Christian,

          1. You have the habit of asking so demanding questions that no one on Earth and also in our universe can answer these questions except KQID. Only ToE can answer what is before the Bit Bang or before the first 10^1000seconds and before the first baby universe 10^-57meters. As I pointed out earlier, KQID is the only theory now that can calculate the first moment of the Bit Bang within 10^-147seconds, with 10^136 K temperature and with variable initial light speed of 10^90m/s that dropped precipitously to 10^14m/s in one second. First, answering your question on singularity, every point Qbit is a singularity that is living per absolute digital time T-moment and then it is ebolving according to KQID Five Laws.

          2. KQID prescribes our universe is a super-cluster galaxies among many in our one Multiverse following the so called the Anthropic Principle, because our Ancestor Qbit computes, simulates and projects all Existence/Multiverse. We are living in this universe because our universe by chance obeying the Five Laws harbors us, TianmingRen in the Cloud. Yes, our Qbit is NOT capable to create and distribute only our universe by specific "intelligent design" but only through the Five Laws to create and distribute Multiverse in which one of a super-cluster galaxies contained intelligent life form like us. This phenomenon is by chance according to the Five Laws, not by religious intelligent design argument nor "many worlds" quantum interpretation. Therefore what is before our universe is among many possibilities: 1. A random quantum fluctuation in the vacuum of our Multiverse; 2. An earlier universe collapsed and rebounded universe; 3. Collision among super cluster galaxies or a newly formed super massive universal mass black hole that time reversed itself into a white hole that is inflating as we have observed as it is becoming our universe.

          Thanks for your trust by assigning me the toughest questions in our universe and giving me the opportunity to answer them.

          Gratefully yours,

          Leo KoGuan

          I repost my comment on Ken Wharton's great essay here

          Dear Ken,

          Great read and very well argued piece and very instructive discussion on time. I really enjoyed your craft. If you allow me to indulge myself to integrate your concept with KQID below. You wrote on option B that I choose to discuss: "(B) Only t is ordinary time; T is not." KQID: time t (iτLx,y,z) is relativistic times according to KQID relativistic and holographic Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm), whereas T (Lm) is absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000seconds in which everything is in the state of block NOW where time-past-present-future merged. And T is the clock rate of our Existence computed, simulated and projected by Qbit (00, +, -) as the omni-mathematician, the Grand Wizard Merlin, Planck's matrix of all matter and KQID-Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory. This hologram Existence is the 3-D relativistic (t) as the fetus of time, and T is permanently pregnant with 3-D time as Existence. In other words, t is inside T and we only experience relative times in 3D time simply because T is ticking regularly in asymmetrical Minkowski's Multiverse timeline as history. it is really 3-D in the 0-D or Lm(Tn...) where space is 3-D time moving perpendicularly in 0-D T. Yes, as you inferred Existence is infinite, that requires infinite math and physics that is deeply paradoxical in its nature (see Richard Shoup's essay) and it must follow its own self-consistent "mathematical rules that seem strange and esoteric to us humans."

          Extremely fine jewelry craftsmanship, I would vote highly and please comment and rate my piece.

          Thank you,

          Leo KoGuan

          I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's profound essay here

          Dear Richard,

          Excellent and profound essay! I enjoyed reading yours. I do believe we need at least two to start an exchange between two fundamental element that is actual one element that splits itself up into two so that it can evolve and exchange with each other to fo-evolve and so one. It is bootstrapping itself. It is pure magic.

          I agree with you that "Mathematics is generative, dynamic, and alive." Yours deserved a high score and please look at mine and yes it is true we are searching for the fundamental truth.

          Best wishes,

          Leo KoGuan

          I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's great essay here

          Dear Richard,

          Xuan Yuan about 4712 years ago already stated in The Four Canons, 11 explains how things come into beings, from the "Void" without distinction: "All things had been one whole before the Heaven and Earth split... with no distinction of day and night, Yin and Yang. Since Yin and Yang were not separated yet, it was not possible to name anything. Now that one is divided into two: Yin and Yang, and the four seasons distinguished... become the norm. The enlightened take it as the Dao, which is profound and subtle, and follow it in whatever they do. Following the Dao is the same as handling the relationship between the female and the male. When there is attraction between the two, then follows the union of the assertive and the receptive. They complement each other and give birth to new forms."

          Here another quotation from Zhuangzi Derived his thought from Xuan Yuan more than 2000 years before him that describes how a difference causes Existence, here is the quotation for your review: "Heaven, Earth, and I were produced together, and all things and I are one. Since they are one, can there be speech about them? But since they are spoken of as one, must there not be room for speech? One and Speech are two; two and one are three. Going on from this (in our enumeration), the most skillful reckoner cannot reach (the end of the necessary numbers), and how much less can ordinary people do so! Therefore from non-existence we proceed to existence till we arrive at three; proceeding from existence to existence, to how many should we reach? Let us abjure such procedure, and simply rest here." See Legge, James. trans. Zhuangzi, "The Adjustment of Controversies"; See also Watson, Burton. trans. Zhuangzi: Basic Writing, "All things equal."

          Yes, something more fundamental is change/difference itself as the source of Existence. However, they did not have the latest knowledge that we have, they had no theory with equations and numbers derived from those equations. KQID fixed these problems and stated that Existence has one Source Qbit(00, , -), one Principle Giving first Taking later; one theory bit is it; one Zeroth equation with one normalized number "1"; and one quantum entangled Existence.

          Thank you for your great contribution, I hope I can add mine.

          Truly yours,

          Leo KoGuan

          6 days later

          Dear Leo KoGuan,

          In my earlier essays, of a more universal nature, the links between our essays were more obvious. My current essay is tightly focused on a specific problem, so there is less overlap visible. Nevertheless I always enjoy reading your essays and relish your attitude that, with Leibniz, we are living in the best possible world. As a younger man I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out, were I God, how to improve on Creation. I'm sure you know that I never found anything I could change to make it a better world. Any evil that I tried to remove, also removed a good. Therefore we must simply keep the mix but change the balance. I live on a ranch near the California coast. Every day when I awake I say "Another day in Paradise." This is in total harmony with your motto: "Alive, we are in Heaven!."

          You say "the Qbit is everything and everything is the Qbit." I believe the nature of reality is one substance; this substantial reality incorporating consciousness and matter as unified unfolding of structure and awareness of structure. I also like your focus on 'Giving first, Taking later' which has elsewhere been described as the essence of capitalism: invest time and money and effort on the faith that the universe is just and rewards will follow.

          I invite you to read my essay and welcome your comments.

          Warm regards,

          Edwin Eugene Klingman

            Dear Leo KoGuan,

            Though I find your ideas very difficult to understand they are fascinating. I often write for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technology (http://ieet.org/) which covers topics such as trans-humanism and the Singularity. Although I am not sure how your ideas relate to those, I think the audience there would be fascinated with a Chinese perspective on these issues and your own philosophy.

            Is there any chance you would be willing to do an interview with me in the next few months?

            As a side note, I am in the contest this year as well. Please check out my essay and give me the vote you think I deserve if you have not done so already.

            http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2391

            All the best,

            Rick Searle

              4 days later

              Dear Leo KoGuan,

              I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

              All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

              Joe Fisher