TianmingRen in the Cloud by KoGuan Leo

Dear Christian,

Thank you for your comments and questions which are penetrating and profound.

1. You wrote : "I agree that maths is truth." KQID prescribes paradoxical Existence that it is fiction but real. Hence the math is truly mapping one to one to this holographic Existence that is fiction but real. In short, Math is truth in fiction. Interestingly Dr. Richard Shoup's essay : "Emergence of Space and Time from Ultimately Simple Mathematics" has expressed this fundamental paradoxical of nature that KQid shares. I highly recommend to read it.

2. You asked: "If our 4-D Universe is a holographic Existence, the Ancestor Qbit should be a 5-D world. Am I correct? My humble answer: there is no need to have the 5-D to map the 4-D, KQID prescribes that we are actually in the zeroth-D in time that is living in the zeroth-D. As it is the zeroth D, it is nowhere but everywhere, the Euclid's point as well as Huishi's point. That is why the projection of our holographic Existence comes from the zeroth-D to 1-D to 2-D to 3-D time in time(the 4th D is the zeroth-D.) Yes it is 4D world but the 1st--D is the zeroth-D. In other words, Existence is existing/living in the zeroth-D time, Minkowski's Multiverse timeline (Lm) as in Ψ(iτLx,y,ż, LM)

3. You asked: "It seems that KQID's principle comprises the principle of information preserving. This also explains why you replace "Big Bang" with "Bit Bang"." My humble answer: yes absolutely. It is our Ancestor Qbit (00, +, -) is unfolding into all things where ΙΨ(CTE ) is Shakespearian meme actor with consciousness, time and energy who is acting in our relativistic of hologram Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,ż, LM). Newton seemed to say that no need for our Creator's hypothesis for his laws, and yet we know he believed that God intervenes time to time to correct the chaos of 8 planets orbiting our Sun. We must not be afraid to bring about the scientific Creator as long as this model must subject to Xuan Yuan-Popper's falsification that this model works all the time without fails at any place.

4. Your asked: "What does it happen before the first 10^-147seconds? In other words, does KQID theory remove the initial singularity?" In KQID, every point Ψ(iτLx,y,ż) is a singulatity in 0-D that is living in absolute digital time T-moment ≤10^-1000 seconds. In short, KQID states that before the first 10^-147seconds is the T-moment ≤10^-1000 seconds ( closed to zero but not zero). From the point of 10^-1000 seconds to 10^57m of 10^-147seconds. Another way to put it, the point is the absolute digital time T, the unwinding clock as the Bit Bang.

I am really happy to get your comments and questions and we have logical and rational discourses. I welcome our community to join in, for that I am grateful.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Christian,

1. You have the habit of asking so demanding questions that no one on Earth and also in our universe can answer these questions except KQID. Only ToE can answer what is before the Bit Bang or before the first 10^1000seconds and before the first baby universe 10^-57meters. As I pointed out earlier, KQID is the only theory now that can calculate the first moment of the Bit Bang within 10^-147seconds, with 10^136 K temperature and with variable initial light speed of 10^90m/s that dropped precipitously to 10^14m/s in one second. First, answering your question on singularity, every point Qbit is a singularity that is living per absolute digital time T-moment and then it is ebolving according to KQID Five Laws.

2. KQID prescribes our universe is a super-cluster galaxies among many in our one Multiverse following the so called the Anthropic Principle, because our Ancestor Qbit computes, simulates and projects all Existence/Multiverse. We are living in this universe because our universe by chance obeying the Five Laws harbors us, TianmingRen in the Cloud. Yes, our Qbit is NOT capable to create and distribute only our universe by specific "intelligent design" but only through the Five Laws to create and distribute Multiverse in which one of a super-cluster galaxies contained intelligent life form like us. This phenomenon is by chance according to the Five Laws, not by religious intelligent design argument nor "many worlds" quantum interpretation. Therefore what is before our universe is among many possibilities: 1. A random quantum fluctuation in the vacuum of our Multiverse; 2. An earlier universe collapsed and rebounded universe; 3. Collision among super cluster galaxies or a newly formed super massive universal mass black hole that time reversed itself into a white hole that is inflating as we have observed as it is becoming our universe.

Thanks for your trust by assigning me the toughest questions in our universe and giving me the opportunity to answer them.

Gratefully yours,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment on Ken Wharton's great essay here

Dear Ken,

Great read and very well argued piece and very instructive discussion on time. I really enjoyed your craft. If you allow me to indulge myself to integrate your concept with KQID below. You wrote on option B that I choose to discuss: "(B) Only t is ordinary time; T is not." KQID: time t (iτLx,y,z) is relativistic times according to KQID relativistic and holographic Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm), whereas T (Lm) is absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000seconds in which everything is in the state of block NOW where time-past-present-future merged. And T is the clock rate of our Existence computed, simulated and projected by Qbit (00, +, -) as the omni-mathematician, the Grand Wizard Merlin, Planck's matrix of all matter and KQID-Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory. This hologram Existence is the 3-D relativistic (t) as the fetus of time, and T is permanently pregnant with 3-D time as Existence. In other words, t is inside T and we only experience relative times in 3D time simply because T is ticking regularly in asymmetrical Minkowski's Multiverse timeline as history. it is really 3-D in the 0-D or Lm(Tn...) where space is 3-D time moving perpendicularly in 0-D T. Yes, as you inferred Existence is infinite, that requires infinite math and physics that is deeply paradoxical in its nature (see Richard Shoup's essay) and it must follow its own self-consistent "mathematical rules that seem strange and esoteric to us humans."

Extremely fine jewelry craftsmanship, I would vote highly and please comment and rate my piece.

Thank you,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's profound essay here

Dear Richard,

Excellent and profound essay! I enjoyed reading yours. I do believe we need at least two to start an exchange between two fundamental element that is actual one element that splits itself up into two so that it can evolve and exchange with each other to fo-evolve and so one. It is bootstrapping itself. It is pure magic.

I agree with you that "Mathematics is generative, dynamic, and alive." Yours deserved a high score and please look at mine and yes it is true we are searching for the fundamental truth.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's great essay here

Dear Richard,

Xuan Yuan about 4712 years ago already stated in The Four Canons, 11 explains how things come into beings, from the "Void" without distinction: "All things had been one whole before the Heaven and Earth split... with no distinction of day and night, Yin and Yang. Since Yin and Yang were not separated yet, it was not possible to name anything. Now that one is divided into two: Yin and Yang, and the four seasons distinguished... become the norm. The enlightened take it as the Dao, which is profound and subtle, and follow it in whatever they do. Following the Dao is the same as handling the relationship between the female and the male. When there is attraction between the two, then follows the union of the assertive and the receptive. They complement each other and give birth to new forms."

Here another quotation from Zhuangzi Derived his thought from Xuan Yuan more than 2000 years before him that describes how a difference causes Existence, here is the quotation for your review: "Heaven, Earth, and I were produced together, and all things and I are one. Since they are one, can there be speech about them? But since they are spoken of as one, must there not be room for speech? One and Speech are two; two and one are three. Going on from this (in our enumeration), the most skillful reckoner cannot reach (the end of the necessary numbers), and how much less can ordinary people do so! Therefore from non-existence we proceed to existence till we arrive at three; proceeding from existence to existence, to how many should we reach? Let us abjure such procedure, and simply rest here." See Legge, James. trans. Zhuangzi, "The Adjustment of Controversies"; See also Watson, Burton. trans. Zhuangzi: Basic Writing, "All things equal."

Yes, something more fundamental is change/difference itself as the source of Existence. However, they did not have the latest knowledge that we have, they had no theory with equations and numbers derived from those equations. KQID fixed these problems and stated that Existence has one Source Qbit(00, , -), one Principle Giving first Taking later; one theory bit is it; one Zeroth equation with one normalized number "1"; and one quantum entangled Existence.

Thank you for your great contribution, I hope I can add mine.

Truly yours,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Edwin,

I always enjoy reading your erudite essays that combine humanity and science. Yes, we do have similar worldview that I think is simply logical, rational and shockingly simple. I agree with you that reality is a brute force one cannot ignore: you put it bluntly: "The physical world does exist, as anyone can prove by jumping from a high place." Another I also believe in: "Specifically, what should we do when map logic conflicts with our physical intuition? I believe that the physical world can be trusted."

I know community find my essay is too abstracts with many Chinese, Shakespearian and Greek philosophy that difficult to understand but actually it is so simple based on reality as it is like yours. I believe in nature is infinite, thus, everything is paradoxically true like both local and non-local communications and events of nature. I describes this phenomena in KQID. Therefore, your conclusion that Bell's non-local entanglement could be explained also in local causality make sense to me. I believe this is correct. You have done great work and path a new insight of nature as it is.

Let us work together to make our world a better place for all, including aliens, cyborgs and self-conscious robots and androids. I would like to visit your Caligornia sunny hut and together every morning we declare: we are in paradise!

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Peter,

Thank you for your kind complement. Yours I agree more beautiful than my essay. I join in this essay contest to learn and join the celebration of beautiful ideas of our great bits-beings civilization with all wonderful and colorful ideas. I like them all. Yes, I combine not only Greek, Shakespearian but also Chinese philosophy that amazed me that we share common bond in ideas. People look for differences but I look for similarity and beauty of all ideas. Your red and green socks picture are really wonderful and simple to understand to explain complicated ideas. Well done! Let us celebrate diversity and enjoy many varieties foods for thought as presented here.

On serious note, our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously. We must have both relativistic time as described by KQID pictures using Lorentz's inverse transformation to KQID-Newton's absolute time that is clocking at Multiversal time clock per absolute digital time тЙд 10^-1000seconds. Believe me or not KQID has also discovered from it's equations how light speed c evolved from the Bit Bang to our present light speed c. So wonderful right if it is true. We can know Newton's mass as we know Eintein's equation of mass = E/c^2 that eluded Einstein. He did not know what is energy because he did not what is c.

Let us celebrate diversity of ideas and all bits-beings human as well as self-conscious robots and cyborgs. Let us live forever here and now in harmony and after this precious life that we have. No wars but Giving first Taking later in a regulated but free and open market of ideas.

On math, KQID picture is that math is fiction but real or real but fiction. It is both a trick and a truth. Any way, I rated your essay as usual to what it deserved a full score. Thank you again for your kind comment on my essay.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Dear R J,

Yes, KQID is purely physical theory since it is physical monism, everything is bit or bit is it and it is bit. It is a bit paradigm rather than a it paradigm. However, the bit paradigm is a newly evolved paradigm that does the thinking part like our neocortex brain and the it paradigm is doing the instinctive part of our senses like our mammalian brain. We need both to function well in our wotld, fiction but real. It has a vivid picture of Existence and it is the only theory right now that can calculate how our c emerged from the Bit Bang to our present light speed in the vacuum as we have observed. The size of our universe at the creation and its temperature and its light speed. It is falsifiable theory base on real equations with real numbers that can be verified or falsified easily by any thing, any living thing like virus, bacteria or human.

Please stay in touch and we can converse in real numbers based on real equations based on nature as it is.

Best regards and thanks for your comment,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Rick,

Thank you for your kind comment and your interest in my thought. I don't know about an interview for I have never given any before. KQID is based on Xuan Yuan's DAO concept that it is the substance that creates and distributes everything that is. Dao as Giving first Taking later (Love) has been unfolding itself from its first emergent out of Non-existence by its own free will by itself and for itself. As I mentioned in my blog, this Philosoy has its theory, equations and numbers like that can be falsified or verified in scientific experiments or by everyday life experiences. As mentioned here, KQId is the only terry right now that can calculate with numbers precisely the size of our baby universe at birth, its temperature and its speed.how c evolve from the creation to the present light speed in the vacuum within 5 thousand years after the Bit Bang.

I looked at your essay and thought very highly and rated it accordingly,

Let us continue our discussion and I believe in strongly the symphony of ideas,

Sincerely yours,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Marc,

Thank you giving me your kind comment and rated my essay highly. If I may differ with you a little but agree with you a lot in most fundamental way in which physics is math but this math is KQID Zeroth Law.

Physics = KQID Zeroth Law = math. This Zeroth Law is ☰00☷ = Ee^iτ = A+S= IΨ(CTE) = Ψ(iτLx,y,z, T) ⊆T=1. This is why we have an orderly universe that we have been observing as the privileged Anthropic Observers that create and distribute Anthropic principle. Thus we have many similarities but each is unique being. Each has infinite clones if physics = math. Furthermore, if physics = math, we will have so many bizarre realities which we have observed. I believe Existence must be "orderly" and "regular" infinite possibilities, Theregore, KQID Zeroth Law governed its evolution from its initial to its infinite potentialities. KQID has the bit paradigm that functions like our neocortex brain on top of the it paradigm that function like our mammalian brain. The bit rules over it whereas its manifested the bits in our realm.

I rated highly your essay and I wish you the best in this contest.

Leo KoGuan

reply to this thread

Dear James,

I looked at your article, I could not find the sentence that I wrote above with Peter Jacson on his article on Bell's non-locality that :

"Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously. It must be both this and that simultaneously."

When I wrote "all this and all that" I had Zhuangzi and Huishi's picture of reality in mind that everything connecting as one. I found this idea is so beautiful and philosophically fullfiling as an earthling living in Sagan's blue dot within an immense Multiverse as the creation of our Ancestor Qbit in his Qbit-centric perspective of creation by itself, for itself and of itself. We and Existence are living in Qbit. Qbit is love with its operating system of Giving first Taking later (love) to create and distribute all that is.

I am glad you invited me to check on your article and I found your article indeed has similar idea as mine and it is well executed and beautiful and fresh. We are indeed connected. We are indeed one with diversity of ideas and myriads of characters. We are also unique in our own way. None is a clone of another. Similarity with a difference.

Best,

Leo KoGuan