Dear Cristi,

Thank you for careful analysis and very important questions! I cannot ignore the issues of such importance. This will keep me busy for a long time. Thank you very much.

Responding immediately on the geometrization of the electromagnetic interaction I would evoke the Kaluza-Klein framework. However I have to study this question very carefully.

The holographic principle refers to string theories. These are also geometric in background but in completely different way. I cannot accept M theories as so far they do not generate predictions (there are some claims recently) and they demand more than 4 dimensions and I assume that 4 is enough.

I have claimed that the spin of graviton is not applicable as I am convinced (not in 100%) that gravity is not a fundamental but emergent phenomenon so graviton does not exist.

Not only your essay but also your honest approach and important notices deserve a high rating. I have not got my voting code yet. Guys responsible are out of the office.

Best regards,

Jacek

Dear Jacek,

Thanks for your reply.

Actually, the holographic principle has general character. In fact, it was introduced in a famous t' Hooft's Essay where, following Susskind it was found that "the combination of quantum mechanics and gravity requires the three dimensional world to be an image of data that can be stored on a two dimensional projection much like a holographic image". Extension of holographic principle to string theory was mainly due to the Maldacena conjecture.

I am surprised that you have not got your voting code yet. I received it in the Fqxi email confirming my submission.

Also kindly notice that I am Christian Corda, not Cristi Stoica, although I am in friendship with Cristi and I appreciate his research work.

Cheers, Ch.

    Dear Christian (sorry for Christi),

    I have made a complaint and finally received my code.

    You can see the effect right now! Congratulation.

    Jacek

    Hi Jacek,

    at first I skimed over your essay and found it interesting. Actually I used the exceptional geometries (NIL, SOLV, SL2) in my work. In a previous paper I described the interaction with them (see the paper). The idea is simple: the connection between the knot complements (=fermions) are torus bundles and there are only 3 types of torus bundles which can be identified with interactions (weak, strong and EM). In this paper you will also find the identification of bosons to the geometries.

    Currently I think about the SL2 geometry and the Ricci flow.In the past I thought that the Ricci flow is something to do with the measurment process in quantum mechanics but now I changed my mind. I have to go over your essay more carefully. Thanks for your words.

    Best Torsten

      Hi Torsten,

      Could you please give me the link described above as "(see the paper)" as it does not work and I am really interested in.

      Thanks,

      Jacek

      Hi Jacek,

      try http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2230 and download the PDF (it is the published version). Secion 8 discussed the gauge group and explains the geometry.

      Unfortunately, I see now that I don't mention the geometries (I think the referee don't want to see them and ask to remove them).

      Here it is:

      finite order = E3 (Eucledian)

      Dehn twist = NIL

      Anosov = SOLV

      Best Torsten

      Dear Jacek,

      I congratulate as you wrote a brilliant essay. I enjoyed reading it from the beginning until the ending.You described your theory well and I would say it is NOt contradictory to KQID but it is KQID in different clothing with its different symbols, and story. Beneath it, we are in complete agreement. You should read carefully my essay again and you will discover similarity like below statement in which KQID has identical proposition.

      You wrote:

      "We propose the evolution of information concept. To explain it very shortly, we have to apply the theory of Darwinism beyond its original sphere of organic evolution on Earth. The organic evolution refers to some pieces of DNA (a kind of information) and not to species (what is the most common misconception). Going further beyond information carried by pieces of DNA (that are sets of molecules), we observe only the waves (information) possessing long-term existence and stability."

      If I may add we must fight for diversity, tolerance and inclusivity and we must fight against uniformity, intolerance and exclusivity. We are for "harmonious unity" or unity in diversity of ideas, races, languages, cultures and civilizations,

      Best wishes and hope you will do well and I vote according to my favorable view,

      Leo KoGuan

        Dear Leo,

        Thank you very much for your kind comments.

        I fully support your emphasis on diversity, tolerance and inclusivity.

        I will try to read your essay again. As you see so many essays were published in last few days that it is hard to be careful. And to be honest, we shall try to take a look for all of them.

        Best regards,

        Jacek

        Dear Jacek,

        My essay proves that forces are instantaneous, and from that fact QM naturally arises. I hope you know some programming.

        Essay

        Thanks and good luck.

          Dear Adel,

          I will take a look at your essay asap.

          Unfortunately I do not know programming.

          Best regards,

          Jacek

          6 days later

          Dear Jacek,

          I read with great interest your essay. I totally agree with you that only the language of geometric representations can lead to an adequate model of the Universe as a whole and the new paradigm, as you stated: "We need this different angle - a paradigm shift." My high score. Philosopher and mathematician Vasily Nalimov said that only on the basis of the language of geometric representations can construct a model of "self-aware universe."

          Fundamental knowledge, mathematics and physics, requires a deep ontological justification (basification). In fundamental physics is necessary to introduce an ontological standard justification (basification) along with the empirical standard. I invite you to see and appreciate my analysis of the philosophical foundations of mathematics and physics, the method of ontological constructing a new basis of knowledge and new unifying paradigm - the basic generating structure, "La Structure mère" as the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge, the core of which - ontological (structural, cosmic) memory.

          Kind regards,

          Vladimir

            Dear Vladimir,

            Thank you for your appreciation. I will read your essay with great interest asap.

            Best regards,

            Jacek

            15 days later

            Dear Jacek,

            I finally got to your essay, and I enjoyed it very much. I like the Geometrical Universe Hypothesis (GUH), since geometry is involved at all levels of fundamental physics. Very well written, with excellent ideas.

            Best wishes,

            Cristi

              Thank you very much Cristi,

              I was convinced that no one is still interested in the contest.

              I am very glad that your essay is so much appreciated and I could contibute in that score. Congratulations!

              Jacek

              Dear Jacek,

              I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

              All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

              Joe Fisher

              10 days later

              You demonstrate various notions of hypothesis that relate it to the quantum of life with purely possible convictions.

              - Sincerely,

              Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan