Dear Christian (sorry for Christi),

I have made a complaint and finally received my code.

You can see the effect right now! Congratulation.

Jacek

Hi Jacek,

at first I skimed over your essay and found it interesting. Actually I used the exceptional geometries (NIL, SOLV, SL2) in my work. In a previous paper I described the interaction with them (see the paper). The idea is simple: the connection between the knot complements (=fermions) are torus bundles and there are only 3 types of torus bundles which can be identified with interactions (weak, strong and EM). In this paper you will also find the identification of bosons to the geometries.

Currently I think about the SL2 geometry and the Ricci flow.In the past I thought that the Ricci flow is something to do with the measurment process in quantum mechanics but now I changed my mind. I have to go over your essay more carefully. Thanks for your words.

Best Torsten

    Hi Torsten,

    Could you please give me the link described above as "(see the paper)" as it does not work and I am really interested in.

    Thanks,

    Jacek

    Hi Jacek,

    try http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2230 and download the PDF (it is the published version). Secion 8 discussed the gauge group and explains the geometry.

    Unfortunately, I see now that I don't mention the geometries (I think the referee don't want to see them and ask to remove them).

    Here it is:

    finite order = E3 (Eucledian)

    Dehn twist = NIL

    Anosov = SOLV

    Best Torsten

    Dear Jacek,

    I congratulate as you wrote a brilliant essay. I enjoyed reading it from the beginning until the ending.You described your theory well and I would say it is NOt contradictory to KQID but it is KQID in different clothing with its different symbols, and story. Beneath it, we are in complete agreement. You should read carefully my essay again and you will discover similarity like below statement in which KQID has identical proposition.

    You wrote:

    "We propose the evolution of information concept. To explain it very shortly, we have to apply the theory of Darwinism beyond its original sphere of organic evolution on Earth. The organic evolution refers to some pieces of DNA (a kind of information) and not to species (what is the most common misconception). Going further beyond information carried by pieces of DNA (that are sets of molecules), we observe only the waves (information) possessing long-term existence and stability."

    If I may add we must fight for diversity, tolerance and inclusivity and we must fight against uniformity, intolerance and exclusivity. We are for "harmonious unity" or unity in diversity of ideas, races, languages, cultures and civilizations,

    Best wishes and hope you will do well and I vote according to my favorable view,

    Leo KoGuan

      Dear Leo,

      Thank you very much for your kind comments.

      I fully support your emphasis on diversity, tolerance and inclusivity.

      I will try to read your essay again. As you see so many essays were published in last few days that it is hard to be careful. And to be honest, we shall try to take a look for all of them.

      Best regards,

      Jacek

      Dear Jacek,

      My essay proves that forces are instantaneous, and from that fact QM naturally arises. I hope you know some programming.

      Essay

      Thanks and good luck.

        Dear Adel,

        I will take a look at your essay asap.

        Unfortunately I do not know programming.

        Best regards,

        Jacek

        6 days later

        Dear Jacek,

        I read with great interest your essay. I totally agree with you that only the language of geometric representations can lead to an adequate model of the Universe as a whole and the new paradigm, as you stated: "We need this different angle - a paradigm shift." My high score. Philosopher and mathematician Vasily Nalimov said that only on the basis of the language of geometric representations can construct a model of "self-aware universe."

        Fundamental knowledge, mathematics and physics, requires a deep ontological justification (basification). In fundamental physics is necessary to introduce an ontological standard justification (basification) along with the empirical standard. I invite you to see and appreciate my analysis of the philosophical foundations of mathematics and physics, the method of ontological constructing a new basis of knowledge and new unifying paradigm - the basic generating structure, "La Structure mère" as the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge, the core of which - ontological (structural, cosmic) memory.

        Kind regards,

        Vladimir

          Dear Vladimir,

          Thank you for your appreciation. I will read your essay with great interest asap.

          Best regards,

          Jacek

          15 days later

          Dear Jacek,

          I finally got to your essay, and I enjoyed it very much. I like the Geometrical Universe Hypothesis (GUH), since geometry is involved at all levels of fundamental physics. Very well written, with excellent ideas.

          Best wishes,

          Cristi

            Thank you very much Cristi,

            I was convinced that no one is still interested in the contest.

            I am very glad that your essay is so much appreciated and I could contibute in that score. Congratulations!

            Jacek

            Dear Jacek,

            I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

            All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

            Joe Fisher

            10 days later

            You demonstrate various notions of hypothesis that relate it to the quantum of life with purely possible convictions.

            - Sincerely,

            Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan