- "Could God be omniscient, if reality itself is not set until it is observed by humans? " -
First, let us change the word "God" with "Nature" in order to avoid any offense. A simple dialogue follows:
- What if a cat observed the "particle" of the exp? Will the result be changed?
- Of course it would. But no cat is able to observe the "particle" as it does not have the appropriate equipment for this.
- OK. What if another "particle" (e.g. electron, photon) observed our "particle"?
- Hm. This is a good quest, but we consider living creatures as observers and not "particles".
- The equipment of measurement we have used for observation is a living creature?
- What do you mean, the "particle" of exp is always observed by something and this is contextuality?
- YES. In a sense, contextuality, as humans like to say it, is the same thing with "entanglement" because anything has been born by an entanglement procedure in the past. This interconnection of anything with anything in the Universe is one of the causes that weirdness quantum theory seems to have. The other missing part is the duality of the reality we are all living in. We tried to host two realities into one without success.
- Though you went too far for me, can you explain what do you imply?
- Let us suppose that reality is consisted by two (sub-)realities, red(R) and blue(B). These two are inseparable and they both shape our whole reality (R+B). We are able to sense only the R one. So far we have formalized two theories (GR and QM) that are not compatible.
- So what?
- You always wait for a ready solution. Try to get your brain to work. Anyway, What if one theory (GR) is dealing with R part and the other (QM) incorporates both R and B?
- Stop, I think I got you. These two theories would seem incompatible because QM would be like having some "hidden variables" that would be undetectable through GR. Furthermore, whenever these "hidden variables" play a role, by enforcing R to "strange" results, we would discover a new "paradox".
- I think you got the point ...