Joe,

In the thread above, I asked you a couple of relatively straight forward questions to which you gave a non-answer. I must therefore conclude that your ideas do not allow you to make any predictions and your ideas do not allow you to perform any calculations. Therefore, you are not presently doing science.

If it is any consolation, few scientists today are doing science either since the major ideas today are not testable. Given their poor example, it is little wonder that things are as they are.

Good luck developing your ideas to a point where they are science.

Regards,

Gary Simpson

Prince is dead. But all too alive are the MIW and MWI theoretical physicists (mainly men) telling us that everything that Prince did, every note he played, was 100% determined by nothing but laws-of-nature interacting with the environment (where the environment is itself 100% determined by laws-of-nature). These naïve physicists are telling us that all of reality is identical: they are saying that the murderer, the musician, the Nobel prize winner are all identically 100% victims of circumstances and 100% ruled by law-of-nature rules.

For 100 years now, reality has clearly been telling physicists that this is not the case. Reality has clearly demonstrated that it is NOT 100% deterministic. But the male dominated physics world is too frightened to accept the implications of a non-deterministic reality.

    Gary,

    Do you, or do you not have a complete skin surface? Does every piece of observable matter, be it natural like a tree, or be it fabricated like a chest of drawers made from a tree not have a complete visible surface? Is the law of reality not consistent throughout the real Universe. Then obviously, the real observable Universe consists of SURFACE. Surface is not put together mathematically, so why would I be stupid enough to show you useless calculations. The real Universe is not scientific. It is utterly simple. So why are you persisting to believe in complicated scientific codswallop.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    Lorraine,

    I am telling you that physical reality is merely infinite surface. It is easy to spot because surface is always illuminated by infinite non-surface light. No need to thank me, it was a pleasure explaining it to you in terms I am confident you can understand.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    Mr Fisher, please.Develop your ideas and reasonings.We don't understand nothing with your surface ,really.You know if you have things to say.Please develop.That has no sense Mr Fisher to always repeat these things.You confoundfor me ,the subjectivity and the objectivity spiritually speaking.

    Steve,

    Reality is not MY IDEA. Please understand that you have a complete surface that includes your eyes. Everywhere you look with your real surface covered eyes; you will only ever see a plethora of seamlessly enmeshed partial flat varied colored surface. Only observable infinite surface exists. There is no space. Nature provided that infinite surface. Hawking's silly contention that invisible nothing exploded 13 and three quarters of a finite billion invisible light year's ago in the big bang singularity may be scientifically acceptable, but it is utterly unrealistic. It is now up to you. Do you want to continue to believe in the fabulous errors of science, or will you please join me in the promulgation of revolutionary reality.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    You see when you want that you can develop a little :) a phenomenon.

    Can I ask you several questions?

    1 how do you interpret the begining of the physicality? There is the hypothetical BB ,personally I prefer a gravitational spherical expansion.But You you think how about this begining?

    For the space ,I agree space does not really exist,matter and energy only exist.

    2 for me a surface is a 2D,and we live in a 3D, of course we have 4D models(Minkowski,Lagrangian.....) for the metics and others calculations of evolution,but our 3D is essential even to see the things,you speak about our eyes like a surface,but in fact it is not really a surface.So my question is simple ,why you insist on this surface like if it was a scientific revolution?Convince me Mr Fisher ?Regards

    Steve,

    Surface is infinite. It had no commencement. Surface is unified; therefore, it has no finite dimension or finite duration, or finite predictability.

    Joe Fisher Realist

    I beleive that you interpret spiritually the luminerous aether.That said the finite systems are essential for the calculations of our universal proportions.All finite system is coded in its uniquenss serie.We can calculate the mass of an aton of hydrogen considering the mendeleev table.An atom is a finite system with its properties.You are a finite systems encoding furthermore Mr Fisher.You are coded in your singularity.You have youe own fréquences and own finite serie of particles and codes ofevolution,gravitational.A Star, an adn, a planet,a particle,....All mass is a finite system with its intrinsic coded.Let's take the evolution.......H ......CNO......H20 HCH H2C2 CH4 NH3 primordial soap......+Energy time by encodings......proteins,amino acids .....ADN..........UNICELLS ........PLURICELLS........fishs.....Reptilians....Lemurians....Mammalians.........Primates.....Hominids.....All these créations are finite systems encoding and evolving.Universe is also a finite system.The infinity has many meanings.It appears with our adds or other mathematical exrapolations.The infinity is also this infinite entropy above our physicality.The infinity can be also in the pure imagination.But our physicality utilises finite systems with coded and properties.The problem it seems to me is that you confound simply this infinite entropyabove our physicality in inserting it in this physicality.I see an interesting spiritualanalyse, that said the lunminerous aether has several problem due to c and the distances.So the instantaneity with this entropical God if I can say cannot appear with this luminerous aether.The gravitational aether is more rational considering particles of gravitation speeder than photons.We can indeed so subjectivelly speaking that all is infinite because we are created by this infinity above our physical universe.But we cannot insert this infinity in our calculations for the proportions.The energy is infinite indeed but relativelly speaking.What do you think ?Regars

    Steve,

    Visible surface am infinite and unified. Surface has never contained any finite invisible atoms. Visible infinite surface was never created by an invisible God.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    • [deleted]

    Is anybody minding the store? I haven't been able to pull up an edit tab for a month, there are several posts listed in the sidebar of recent posts that don't appear in the body of comments, and I forget how long its been since there has been an addition of a topic to the list in the dropdown window from the fqxi icon on my taskbar. Has attrition set in and nobody wanting to take over the thankless unpaid time consuming task of entertaining delinquents on the fqxi blogosphere?

      I know who are these persons hacking my net and pc.They play, I play also.The most impressing for them is that they didn't know my realpersonality.Irritating for tham, becuse their strategy of discriminations is not really a success.So now for their notoriety, they don't want that I am recognized,logic for their poor international credibility.Just a poor team of frustrated thinking that they are more skillings than others,a big vanity, that is all and poor mathematical copies.Well thei are very bad Fallen because they must kill me.But they aren't thinkers after all,just business man frsutrated wanting what they want.I play with them on LinkedIn,My sciences eat yours at the belgian breakfast.You are against me, but I have also people with me.Ironical no? and what your hate increases ?Logic.....Kill me ;it is better.

      dear Fqxi and the future of lifes institute and MIT.These persons hacking my net and linkedin are irritating.Pay attention around you, sometimes persons aren't really general scientists but business men with an enormous vanity.This problem is a big problem.I beleive that it exists several scientists or a team from holland which implies problems.I will not stop, so I tell thzm that I will not stop my transparent publications and reasonings.FqxI please check well the international sciences system.Long life FQXi ,I am with you me and you shallnot be deceived, I don't search the money or others, I just want tolearn more, I have learnt a lot here on thiswonderful fqxi Platform.I have had in the past paranoiac comportments due to these hackers but I am better now:) Regards from Belgium.

      Hi Steve,

      Glad to hear you are better now. I was wondering if you still have a garden or if you are growing any plants in pots? I have been working in the garden almost every day: planting and weeding. We have a lot of avocados on our tree,

      Cheers,

      Lorraine

      Dear Steve,

      Please calm down. The posting from anonymous was completely harmless. Several of my posts have been attributed to anonymous due to the fact that FQXi.org has an erratic timing system for anyone posting comments.

      Just remember that only infinite surface am.

      Joe Fisher, Realist

      Dear Ms Ford,

      I am less parano :) Thanks.Yes I rebegin to cultivate plants and flowers.I had said that never again I will retouch a flower because bad people had destroyed my stock(12000fuchsias)in putting them at the exterior of the greenhouse.I have lived the hell during 12 years.I see the solutions now due to my notary(succession of my mother)and my attorney, but I am tired psychologically speaking.I have never had a ground for my nursery of plants and flowers.It is bizare I am a nurseryman,it is my job in fact but I cannot in Belgium apparently.So I cultivate at home in my small garden of 7 m on 18m,it is small for a nurseryman but I have a small collection in my garden.All is in my compost without adds.Do you know the acer palmatum,I have several beautiful plants and others like passifloras,fuchsias,Buxus sempervirens aged(I cut them with different shapes ...) I have also cholorophytum distychum variegata,Yuccas,saalvia officinalis,mentha,Thymus.....I have about at this momment perhaps 2000 plants.Iris,abutilon,Datura....I like the acer,I work them in bonsaïs ,I strip them 3x/year and the leaves are smaller and the tree remakes new leaves, it is a technic for bonsaïs.I have a beautiful acer palmatum dissectum atropurpurum "Garnet° I am going to put it in bonsaïs, the substartes are special and specific for bonsais,the argils are important.It exists different argils and humus,the mychorrizian fungis also and this and that ,the argils permit a better retention of water.The colloid, the argilo humic complex is relevant when you mix the proportions.The fixations of elementts, ions and cations are optimised.I work on the compost and substrates.It is relevant because all is correlated(natural resistance,growth,....)

      Don't hesiate to ask me ,it is a passion for me the horticulture.I will answer you with pleasure.Best Regards

      Dear Mr Fisher,

      I know,but my net is checked and hacked,on LinkedIn also.I have already had two pc destroyed, it is irritating.On LinkedIn,It is the same.I have persons agianst me ,simply for my works about the spherisation.These persons want to discriminate me.It is a band of scientists, a team.And they don't want that I share my works.They have even hate FOR for me .They have tested my personality and they are Fallen from the sky Mr Fisher.Because they thought that I was not like they would that I am.On LinkedIn,never they put their real names, they have tried, they have not success.I repeat all the times that they loose their times, but they insist.I am parano now you know Mr Fisher due to this human nature and bad instincts.It is sad.They are in fact like Hook, a band of persons whom does not understand what is entropy and universality simply.It isthe sad reality of the sciences community.Fortunally FQXi and the future of lifes institute are universal and are conscient of false generalists and false global thinkers.Best Regards

      :) have you seen ?My country has sent in space the first packet of fried potatoes.Our belgian humor is relevant :)

      Dear Ms Ford,

      About gardening, our climate here in belgium is probably different than yours in USA.But it is alwaysthe same generality.Substrate,water,light and food.In fact it isjust that each family or species and varieties need specific parameters.For example,one of my favorite floweris thefuchsia.Itcomes from Patagonia in argentina.The climateis specific and the culture of fuchsias ofcourse is correlated.They dislike the full sun.They like the shade and a lot of water the morning and before thenight.They like the fresh water.te substrate is a mix of severalargils and with humus and "Heath terra"Several organic adds can be made to this argilo humic complex.NPK,mineral salts and oligo elements can be add with different natural powders.The bacterias and fungis and micro vegetals and micro animals can work in complementarity.The fuchsias are happy with thiskind of substrate.At this moment I have tested allin the pure compost and the resulst are ok,it is not optimum but it is a good result.Best Regards

        I have remarkeed that vegetals and animals are linked with compost.The natural resistance and theoptimisation of growth and quality are functions of optimised substrates and cultures.The potential of genetic gives its optimisation when all paramters are checked.It is a little the same for animals , the food, the adn, the external parametrs, .....all is linked.The cancer is a result of these parameters for example even for plants.I have seen that tumors on vegetals can be fought with several methods, natural correlated with the optimisation of paramters.The secrets are in adn and aminoacids, proteins ....The codes are there.The aim is to stop the growth of tumors.I have tested several oils,and others,it is inetresting to see the results.In fact there are many links with adn andthe comportments of cells.The aim is to permit the apoptosis of cells.I have lost my mother and my father with this disease.A kind of vaccin is possible with add of several things.This death of cancer cells is possible.The scales of codes are probably the answer.The cancer is linked with the old time it seems to me.In fact the encodins are correlzted,there are good encodings and bad informations in fact.The health is important.Mine is not very good, my kind of life is not perfect :) and my adn seeing my parents is not very good .I must stop to smoke furthermore.What a life ,I have all the parameters to have a problem.But it is the life.I will accept.But this cancer can be fought but how can we find this miraculous vaccin ?