In Search of a Quantum Spacetime

On Friday June 24, 2016, I announced to the New York Times that Einstein's Theory of Relativity: Special and General, was incorrect, and I submitted documented proof to the newspaper why this was so. This proven important scientific revelation was ignored. At 6 AM EST The New York Times reported that Loretta Lynch, the Attorney General of the United States of America had announced that she would not interfere with the Hillary Clinton private email server FBI investigation (perhaps because Bill Clinton had requested that she not do so when they met privately in Phoenix) and all of the mostly cable news expert talking heads opined this was the most awful thing that the Clintons had ever done in their entire lives.

Steve,

Unified infinite surface only has one detail, it is always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

It seems very relevant for probabilities and prédictions when we play with parameters.I will learn more,thanks in all case.These stochastic models can be relevant applied to many things.I study a little in the same time.I see that these models, stochastic can be applied to economy or engineering...and even for AI,statistics,probabilities and results can be harmonised.It is fasciating in fact Mr sky.I d like to learn more.Thanks for sharing,I am asking me how we can interpret the creativity and free will with the stochastic models and statistics.The hazardous can be compute like the psychology ?It is intriguing in fact considering AI.Regards

In the theory of probabilities the events can be or cannot be.p=1/n and we play with the implications due to probabilities of events with p=m/n if it equal to zero of course it not possible for the event A equal to p.Logic.Now if we want to add or X or this or that ....we arrive so at the relevance of hazards and free wil leven if we fgo more far with creativity and gravitational informations but it is an other story.Gauss and Laplace are not sufficient even if their theorems ofprobablities are relevant.It is the same with the theory of bernouilli about numbers.It is intriguing because how can we interpret so the errors when we consider a general dterministic system ?The line time and the hazards in a gravitational point of vue seems far of us about the synchros superimposings or sortings.If the errors and thehazards are a reality for our scales, is it really a reality when we consider these gravitational codes ?It is relative in fact about the categorifications of informations and events correlated with hazards and gravity.And still we don't speak about photons,it is still an other story.The spherical volumes are relevant when we consider the stabilities of informations.Best Regards

In theory all is predictable if and only if of course all the parameters are encoded.Of course that implies limits of prédictions due to our limits of scales whe we want to predict the quantum scale and the cosmological scale towards the main singularities.The roads are very complex and far of us ,even the numbers are difficult for us to perceive like our imagination.Sometimes I imagine the earth, I travel in the solar system by my mind and I try to see the galaxy with its millions of billions of stars turning around our central supermassive BH,we are limited even with the our mind.That said we can find a kind of universal logic about sphères and their number finite.It is of course for the uniqueness serie.Probably the same at the two scales.It is easier to find the gravitationalserie than to calculate the number of bosonic photonic informations and spheronic of gravitation.It seems not possible.The events and ancodings can be harmonisedof course but frankly it seems so difficult even for a computer.The quantum computing is intriguing in this line of reasoning.The predictons ofour climate is one thing, the prédictions of our universe an other.We must be so humble in front of this immensity above us and these numbers in our quantum series.Some things are predictables, others no at this moment.That said it is relevant for the checked systems permitting to predict the future in economy or engineering or climate.I am curious to see the results if we increase the vegetal multiplication and composting in océans and on grouns,soils.The system can reach the equilibriums, but it is now that we must do it for the gobal ecology.Now hope that with yourspredictions, the future is not finished due to volcans or due to this or that.Because if it is the case, we must now create a Wheel in space and find adapted solutions for all people on this sphere earth.How are we going also to nourrish all,and the water and the jobs, and the energy ???In fact we must change radically our global system now and in accelerating the adapted technologies and inventions.Mars,the wheels in space(furtermore it produces energy and not need of fuel)....We must accelerate all this quicly it seems to me because if you insert all the global actual parameters, frankly I am supposing that results are not good deaR Jedis of the SPHERE.

I don't believe it is predictable, or rather, it is impossible to know all of the causal frames, since observing them and measuring their state would invariably change their state, which would require that the whole of any mass group be observed at the same time and in such a way that the observation itself causes no change in state, and thus must also include the observer. Since the recording of knowledge requires a state change, there is no possible way for all to be known in advance without changing the state of the whole group and introducing uncertainty.

The entire model is based on independent causalities for each entangled set (fair to call them lie groups, as they are represented so in the model) within it's own Hilbert space. The expressions of boundaries along our 4-dimensions of space (3) and time (1) are carried merely by the propagation of the wave form harmonic. The internal state change can be predicted only insofar as probability mechanics can take us based on the knowledge of the properties of the closed set. That would be a function of its stable mass.

Indeed ,it is intersting for the categorifications of harmonic wave forms and so the informations.The spherical volumes are relevant for the steps and groups.

Algorythms can be applied respecting our mathematical laws peritting to sort,to superimpose or to synchronise.The spherical volumes are important it seems to me humbly.The internal state of these volumes can permit to see the good predictionswhen these volumes are respected with theirintrinsic laws ,deterministic if I can say with of cours the uncertainty principle.The functions appear.

You say Since the recording of knowledge requires a state change, there is no possible way for all to be known in advance without changing the state of the whole group and introducing uncertainty.Indeed ,it is logic in fact simply.And like we are not the creators of this universal 3D sphère and its quant and cosm sphères turning still and always towards this eternity ,so we must accept our human limits.That said we appraoch all days but we are still so far of all our universal laws and its détails.The universal mechanic, newtonian for me and gravitational ,is a so incredibla puzzle in its détails that we must accept humbly our human limits.That said our postulats and équations permit to write the universal partition of spherisation.Thanks for sharing Mr Sky.Could you predict if my theory of spherisation will be inserted in computing If my equaions are correct, it is relevant in all humility.Best Regards

The Washington Post has also declined publishing my op-ed article explaining why Einstein's Theory of (invisible) Relativity: the Special and General is incorrect.

Joe Fisher, Realist

The Los Angeles Times and the Boston Globe have refused to publish my conviction that Einstein's Theory of (invisible) Relativity: Special and General was incorrect.

Joe Fisher, Realist

North Carolina Republican Senator Thom Tillis has forwarded my complaint about the awarding of the 2013 National Science Foundation $1.32 million Grant to the researchers at UCAL Santa Barbera and the Kavli Institute for wrongfully concluding that Einstein was right, to executives at the National Science Foundation together with my evidence that Einstein was incorrect. I submitted my proof of the Einstein error to MENSA, hoping that they will publish it.

Joe Fisher, Realist

In a finite universe, the there can be no infinities. In an infinite universe full of singularities, anything is possible. Multiverses, wormholes, dark matter, dark energy, eternally collapsing objects, etc., are just different ways of dealing with infinities.

Since all observations to date show a finite universe with finite objects with finite actions, singularities simply reflect the limits of spacetime math for representing our finite reality.

Quantum matter is never still and there are always finite orbit times for particles bound in quantum matter. Therefore all 1/r^2 forces, which have singularities at r=0, are really 1/tau^2 forces. Since tau is a finite quantum orbit time, tau is never zero and there are no singularities in the quantum universe of just matter and action.

Gravity force is a pairing of the bonding photons of matter with their complementary photons from CMB creation. Although general relativity does a very good job describing much of reality, GR simply does not describe the quantum orbits that bind objects in the quantum universe. The biphotons of quantum gravity do show the quantum orbits of matter, tau, entangled with the quantum orbits of the universe, Tau.

Centering the universe on matter and action instead of space and time removes the straightjacket of space and time. It is the straightjacket of space and time that keeps science from injuring itself during the current madness of an impossible quantum GR.

Dear Georgina.

You seem not to have noticed that you are alone in your refusal to accept my explanation of the reality of the Universe. You have no allies. I have no disputants other than you. For centuries now, people have been led like mindless sheep, to believe that English writers could accurately reveal the secret of the creation of the universe by either an invisible God, or by an invisible explosion of invisible nothing. Please be convinced that infinite visible surface that is always illuminated by infinite non-surface light, could never have been created. The Bible is a work of fiction. All theoretical physics books are works of fiction.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Dear Joe, lack of response is not the same as acceptance. I have been the only one to show interest in what you have written and tried to see if there is anything worth pursuing, useful or well reasoned. I have found by my own blundering that ideas built into concepts can seem at first good and are in a way seductive. However I now accept that they are like sandcastles. It doesn't matter how beautiful we think they are, or how much time has been spent on them; if they can't stand up against arguments then they must be let go. The remnants perhaps rebuilt more strongly to face another challenge. Being wrong doesn't make the ideas worthless as they are a means of growth and it isn't wrong to love them. Sandcastles can be exquisite and intricate works of art but they are also vulnerable, as they should be. My advice is let it go and then see if there is anything left that you think worth keeping for the next one.

Hello Mr Agnew,

Happy to see you again and thanks for sharing.We have a different interpretation of this universe,but it is interesting to see your thoughts.Isee that the majority of the sciences community search this gravitation.I have seen a lot of works trying to interpret this gravity.But I have seen that the problem was(for me and it is only my point of vue of course,it is not a postulate)to consider this gravitation like an emergent force due to electromagnetic forces ,magnets, mmagnetism,electricity are relevant, but I beeive that gravity is not this.Gravitons for example so are not possible in my point of vue .People wants to explain this weakest force just above our electromagnetism ,weaker.And also they consider these particles weaker than photons.The problemis to have forgotten the bridge above theprotons neutrons with their quanrks at this nuclear forces with gluons.The gravitationl force there increases and at the electromagnetic decreases.We have soa road toards theentire entropy because we go towards the main central singularities, gravitational coded by the cosmological singularity.GR for me acts on the luminerous aether, this photoniic sphererespecting the special relativity,that is why we have the time of arrivals of signals for LIGO,The quantum scale is Under the special relativity but the general do not really work there due to scales.The GR is for the cosmological scale?i agree about so the quantum GR.That said the mass curves spacetime ....Spherisation gravitation are natural ....ps the singularities for me are themain cenral sphères, coded gravitationally implying a stability in space time, that is why these baryons have not a linear velocity and are stable in the topography of our universe.Best Regards and still thanks for sharing.

Dear Georgina,

Lack of any response concerning my unified visible infinite surface that is always illuminated by infinite non-surface light conviction from the forty physics professors including Professor Max Tegmark, who happens to be the Scientific Director of FQXi.org that I have shown it to clearly means that they have accepted it. It makes sense. Hawking etal have strived to write a theory of everything calculation, Every real thing has the same real unified visible surface. Although I did not get any response from the Physics Institutes of America, China, Canada, Russia and Manchester University, the European Institute of Physics Journal Editor advised me that article reviewers would now be given 90 days instead of 60 days to present their reviews.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Dear Joe nothing means nothing, it doesn't contain any information. That it is a positive response is your own imagining. Long ago I did get a response from John Gribbin. He asked me not to send him a book, as he gets that kind of thing all the time. Wise decision on his part.

Georgina,

Nothing does indeed mean nothing, primarily because nothing has never existed. On the other hand, something has always meant something. One real observable Universe could only have one unified visible physical condition and the one condition our real Universe has is infinite surface that is always illuminated by infinite non-surface light. Reality can only consist of minimal finite information.

Joe Fisher, Realist

There was a time that promised never to end, in which people would read popular science and have their batteries recharged by the order and discord in science working together encapsulated by a greater shared vision. Things were

progressing and that is comforting, especially at times individual lives and the common wellbeing were not. Science said there a future.

All of that is haemorrhaging away now. When I go to the once awe-inspiring public interface now....I'm trying to give it up......I come away depressed and fearful of the future. Or as lately, more and more just resigned.

There is no progress and physicists, because of the pressure to rationalize a productive contribution, that grants still flow are endorsing and affirmation when most likely they continue because the foundations that issue them, feel they have no alternative.

Right now a generation is retiring off that produced very little progress through no fault of its own, is retiring off or being kicked upstairs by the current generation, which Sean Carrol counts among, Sabine Hossenfelder, and the others about that age. They will increasingly now be the top table, able to speak as they see fit, with no higher seniority.

This is a generation of individuals with no significant accomplishments to decide between them or to order seniority in the event of discord as to the right course to take. The pecking order of seniority is the same as for non-science. The same, for the music industry. The boy-band domain within it.

This is a disaster. Not because of what it is, in itself, but because of the human nature component which inevitably and inexorably begins to act as a force in which hubris and politicking skills become selected, and courageous thinking and willingness to face scorn and social and academic shunning de-selected. Everyone is playing the game, and that means no one is going to face the problems that might have been soluable if they had.

Dear Ming,

The National Science Foundation shelled out $1.32 million to researchers at the University of California at Santa Barbara to validate Einstein's Theory of (invisible) Relativity: Special and General. I am a researcher in good standing. Einstein, and all of the theoretical physicists have been utterly wrong about the Universe. The real Universe is sublimely simple. The real Universe consists only of a single, unified, unique visible infinite surface that is always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist