I agree that the real observable universe is easy to understand: the real observable universe is made up of discrete matter and discrete action. You describe objects as infinite surfaces that shine infinite non-surface light onto other surfaces. Since a finite surface actually shines discrete photons of light even without any non-surface light, what you say makes no sense. Moreover, a surface can also be transparent and pass the shine of other atoms that lie behind it.
Since light is made up of discrete photons as particles and surfaces are made up of discrete atoms that absorb and shine discrete photons, there is no sense to either surfaces of infinite divisbility or infinite extent. Once again, what you say makes no sense since we live in a discrete and finite universe.
Entanglement is quantum property of the phase of light and matter and of the spin of that phase. It is from the discrete property of quantum spin that our notions of surface and infinity and the infinitesimal emerge. Although the approach of continuous space and time represents reality fairly well, that approach is a patchwork that is not much different from that of spacetime and therefore not a very simple way to describe all of the universe at all.
Since all that you seem to do is repeat the same mantra that makes no sense to me or any one else on the planet, all I can do is inform others about how little sense your mantra seems to make. I like to think of the finite universe in the very simple terms of discrete matter and discrete action and that makes perfect sense to me...