Untangling Quantum Causation

The Joe Fisher user profile, very maliciously impuned Steve Duforney out of supposition which displayed his own narcism and being entirely out of touch with the reality of this forum. But then Steve's own posting of legitimate complaint is deleted by the miscreant to escape the embarrassment his own posturing has revealed. The Fisher profile exhibits behavioral patterns of the compulsive 'Gamer', esc being the go-to button in virtual reality online multi-player tight spots.

But this is a scientific endeavor. Nothing is deleted from server storage, and this has become a double blind experiment in which the demands for attention by the subject have succeded. He has gotten attention, but it is on him not open to him. He can call scientific method 'codswollop' and assail the mentality and character of people in science, yet objects to severe language in response?

What happened to:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2677#post_122677

"Joe"?

Kids that are good at video games have 'fast' eyes. That is what makes then good. But they don't know that, they assume it to be some other attribute they find appealing and expect those attributes to be equally successful in the real world. But 'fast' eyes are the deal-breaker for jet jockeys in training regardless of all other skill sets. A domesticated cat with conditioned reflexes focused on a slow movement of the evening food bowl offering can become entranced with a virtual mouse on an old fashioned television screen (we are scientists not gamers so we know how those things actually worked) but a ferral cat will ignore the screen. It doesn't see a seamless image, it sees the sequential lines of the programmed electron projection panograph. The ferral cat's eyes are that much 'faster'.

Gamers know that the imagery is built up of layering, like GIS. Joe is describing the seamless appearance of the final product while denying the layering.

My mistake, Joe. See how double blind experimentation works?

Hello Mr Simpson,

It is A beautiful work of analytic geometry.Congratultion.I see that you thank Dr Edwin Eugenene Klingman, tell himhello.I am remembering 5 or 6 years ago when he was on this Platform,I liked to read his posts.Hope he is well.Best Regards

Any proprietary server, that is the physical data operating system of an institution with fiduciary responsibility which includes but not limited to intellectual property and such rights of privacy and sequester, will categorically reject transport protocols with an open source identifier. Strictly for security reasons, certain protocols are required that prevent piggy-backing of malware into the system. FQXi is a virtual institute with a legal proxy address in the U.S. but no physical address. And while fqxi is an open source venue, its affiliation with Perimeter makes it a portal into the proprietary data system of Perimeter. Despite ones preference for absolutely open internet and such open source meme generators such as ORCID, security protocols automatically block or segregate alphanumeric sequences that are allocated to an open source identity.

If you lodge textual content in registry with an open source such as ORCID, which itself has no requirement of credential, then zip it into a transport file to offices of Professors and institutions, chances are that it will never be seen. Try Facebook, or some 'publish free!!! with no expectation of reward!' subscribership. Your identity is not well secured in cyberspace as it is, it would be blind faith to open the zip-file. They just don't want to say that on webspots about ORCID, which really benefit publishers not poets.

But back to the aptly named Perimeter, it does have a real physical address. In Canada. Why don't you Yanks have to qualify yourself?

Steve,

Thank you for taking the time to read the work. I believe that the concept of a quaternion cross product is new.

I applied both normal commutation and anti-commutation to the complex i in different parts of the text and doing so produced interesting results.

In one section there is an 8x8 coefficient matrix that is easy to invert.

In another section, it is possible to produce a Hamilton style quaternion based upon the complex plane.

I think the next effort will focus upon Pentuples. What is interesting to me about them is that the mathematics seems to demand that complex conjugates be used. I am thinking it might be possible to define one conjugate as the observed universe and the other conjugate as the observer. Their sum is then the entire universe with no complex terms remaining .... only real terms.

Best Regards,

Gary Simpson

Dear Anonymous,

Thank you for agreeing that I am right and all of the theoretical physicists were wrong about the real Universe.

Joe Fisher

Oh Dear! Joe.

You are entirely mistaken, I was only allowing for your contention that it was not you whom deleted posts, the contention itself lacks qualification. As to you wanting free money as a grant from a proprietary source while demanding that all security protocols should be dropped to permit you as an open source identity to gain access to proprietary channels...

When they close the lid on me, Yank.... when they close the lid.

an with that

)|>!

Hello Mr Simpson,

You are welcome.It is indeed relevant.I asked me why the products of octonions are not both commutative and associative.Is it due to complexs and imaginaries ?If the complexs converge so it is commutatif and associatif no?

If the quaternion are not commutatif with its reals and complexs.And that the associativity is the chief orchestra.I see these quaternions like simple rotations permitting applications in physics in several calculs for example if and only if the 3D is respcted.

If we insert the spherical volumes and the spinal and orbital rotations.And if we find the correct serie of spherical volumes towards the singularities, gravitational.It could be relevant to find the quantum BH and the spherons, particles of gravitation.The serie of uniquenss seems finite and seems universal.The cosmological serie and the quantum serie, primordial are probably the same relatively speaking.I try to find the correct method in geometrical algebras, spherical but it is not easy.Lie groups and octonions seem interesting but are less relevant than quaternions.Dimensions,reals and complexs need a correct convergence implying the correct axioms of choice, domains and foundamentals of physics.What a big puzzle and the word is weak :)Best Regards Jedi of the SPHERE :)

At 9:00 PM EST, on August 29, 1966, I stepped off a Pan American 707 jetliner that had landed at John F Kennedy Airport in Queens NY, and I started living as a resident alien in the great country of America. I wish to thank all Americans for the way they have treated me for the past fifty years. I especially want to thank all of the Americans who have been kind and patient enough to read my Facebook

and FQXi.org posts.

Joe Fisher, Realist