Essay Abstract

The author 'reveals' his wandering towards a research goal in life and science by setting a methodical aim and intention in applied social science, mainly via identifying the hidden (undiscovered) agenda in the socio-economic mal-distribution of human living chances in our (finite) physical and ethical universe of planet earth.

Author Bio

Stephen I. Ternyik (Magister Artium Technologiae) is a self-employed economic researcher & entrepreneur, with more than 30 years of professional experience in management, investment, capital formation and monetary tools; his main scientific interest is creative writing and the design of learning events.

Download Essay PDF File

  • [deleted]

  • Post #2

Dear Researcher Ternyik,

As you will find out if you read my essay, Einstein was utterly wrong when he stupidly stated that "reality was an illusion, albeit a persistent one."

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings such as the ones you effortlessly indulge in. As I have thoughtfully pointed out in my brilliant essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY, the real Universe consists only of one unified visible infinite surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light. Reality am not as complicated as theories of reality are.

Joe Fisher, Realist

    I AM NOT ANONYMOUS> THE INEPT FQXi.org site has again logged me out for no reason.

    I am Joe Fisher, Realist

    Dear Joe Fisher ! Your essay already found my reading interest and it is among the FQXI contributions that I study with more attention, i,e. most so-called experimental claims on natural reality or real nature are indeed pure academic artifacts. Empirical evidence (e.g. progress in surgery) and hypothetical constructs (e.g. human consciousness) belong to the realm of real human life. So, my point is to make a difference between maths as applied to real problems of human life and maths as an esotheric activity. Concerning simplicity, I do think that we should try to use as simple approaches as possible to solve the mystery of nature, but complexity can only be reduced by complexity, i.e. think complex, try to say it simple (and friendly). Nature is reality (not the laboratory) and I do understand that you find your way of enlightenment by the ininite light from non-surface inspirations of real nature. Best: Stephen I. Ternyik

    Dear Stephen, i am glad that someone has the courage to mention the hidden/undiscovered agenda in the socio-economic mal-distribution as it gravitates towards its own collapse (and/or towards war). I also read Erich Fromm decades ago and agree with him more than ever.

    Great to hear back from you, dear Stefan Weckbach ! Many contemporaries are also trying to attack this human systems problem of thermo-economics; Erich Fromm pointed towards the right direction, concerning systems evolution and reform. The physics of human intention and consciousness is a future research field of science where the moral (ethical) dimension (meaning) of space and time will be clarified and corrected by applied methodical logic.

      • [deleted]

      • Post #7

      Dear Stephen,

      First off, let me say that among the great thoughts that characterized Einstein's vision of the physics of nature, don't know why you chose this most unfortunate one to illustrate your writing. Einstein certainly did not think that as part of reality he was an illusion himself.

      Past this little hurdle, I highly praise your essay. Your attempt to put under the same formal tent social dynamics, human economics, cognition and human teleology is quite commendable, not withstanding the scant underlying math.

      Your suspicion about the hidden analytic depths of the Gaussian distribution is quite justified, and I invite you to take a look at my essay for further explanation.

      Although at times there is a lack of clarity in your vision as expressed, I believe your framework of thoughts about the human endeavour as a whole is quite assertive. You sure are a notable thinker!

      Good luck in this contest.

      Joseph

      Jean-Claude

      ___________________

      Dear Stephen,

      First off, let me say that among the great thoughts that characterized Einstein's vision of the physics of nature, don't know why you chose this most unfortunate one to illustrate your writing. Einstein certainly did not think that as part of reality he was an illusion himself.

      Past this little hurdle, I highly praise your essay. Your attempt to put under the same formal tent social dynamics, human economics, cognition and human teleology is quite commendable, not withstanding the scant underlying math.

      Your suspicion about the hidden analytic depths of the Gaussian distribution is quite justified, and I invite you to take a look at my essay for further explanation.

      Although at times there is a lack of clarity in your vision as expressed, I believe your framework of thoughts about the human endeavour as a whole is quite assertive. You sure are a notable thinker!

      Good luck in this contest.

      Joseph

      Jean-Claude

      ___________________

        Dear Joseph ! Your essay contains impressive research , I will study your scientific approach of cognitive physics and give my reader response. My main interest are the construction principles of social (human) reality, i.e. I do not subscribbe to the public relations teaching that reality is no-thing and perception is every-thing. The Einsteinian proverb is surely a provocation, concerning any human effort to cope with 'reality' and to develop a unified (cognitive) systems theory of human life (living). Personally, I do believe, that such a universal blueprint of reality exists and is attainable by the application of scientifc creativity, i.e. religion, philosophy and science have a humanistic commonality, with the scientific method being the most reliable tool of human communication. Best: stephen

        Dear Steve,

        The discussed Einstein quote does not make much sense in the context of physical science. But it does in the context of the human sciences, in particular religion and philosophy. In that sense it is to be related to traditional Eastern philosophy, specifically buddhism and lamaism, which assert that our passage on earth with all its tribulations is a kharmic journey with no other purpose than purifying the soul.

        As a Jew and with the personal education that he had about Eastern religions, one is left to wonder if part of that had inspired his observation.

        You write however: I do not subscribe to the public relations teaching that reality is no-thing and perception is every-thing. Could not agree more.

        Best.

        Joseph

          Dear Joseph ! My understanding of the quote is that it was meant to be a provocation, not more. I have studied the family history and biography of Einstein and would evaluate the mindset as secular Jewish humanism or Judaism as a civilization; this cognitive approach to reality is definitely the opposite to Buddhism. I have already detected some important points in your essay and will respond on your site in some days.I do agree to your conclusion that the quote has to be understood in the context of human science and not physical science; I am working at the intersection of these two sets of scientific knowledge, i.e. applied social science. Best: stephen

          4 days later

          Hello to both of you,

          I beleive that Einstein indeed was a fervent thinker in God.The faith in this infinite entropy above our understanding.He was jew and the faith is improtant for jews.I am not jew but I consider God the chief orchestra of all things.The universal love after all is the only one truth in a pure altruism and universalism.Humanity and lifes are like a rainbow ,a diversity of colors united , unified in light........it is difficult to turn off a big fire with one water drop ,nevertheless a whole of drops makes the ocean ....The altruism ....like humble travellers from stars.Personally and humbly I beleive strongly that it is not possible to ponder general équations about matter and energy, intuitive without this foundamental,this entropy creating this physiocality.It is the real meaning of mc² ,the evolution permits the encodings ,gravitatuion encoded phjotons and particles of gravitation.It is the meaning of my equation implying a gravitational aether from the central cosmological singularity, the biggest BHs producing the speedest spherons in my model,the dark matter, the gravitation in fact, these particles are also encoded in nuclei.God sends gravitational informations mainly checking the zero absolute and the heat towards its paradoxal maximum.The photons are not the only one piece of puzzle.The gravitation is the main chief orchestra.The luminiferous aether is just a photonic sphere.The sphères spheronic produced by supermassive BHs them are bigger due to the linear velocity proportional with the spherical volume of the correlated supermassive BHs central to galaxies.The quantum gravitation cannot be an emergent electromagnetic force in fact,this force is not baryonic and seems correlated with this zero absolute, that is why I consider a cold dark matter and this matter can be ranked withy the spherical volumes and my équations E=mc²+ml² and mlosV=Constant the linear velocity of this gravitational aether can be ranked with the volumes,that is why that tends to infinity like the gravitation.God is near us with this weakest force created by this central BH with this linear velocity correlated of particles produced.Einstein said that God does not play at dices ,I agree ,that is why the gravitation balances the thermo like the + and the - Simply.Sometimes I imagine all these 1000 billions of galaxies turning around this central BH,I imagine the number of stars and planets and the lifes ,you imagine, at this moment they evolve,live,eat,think, smile, laugh,create...We are Inside a wonderful mechanic of evolution where souls and bodies evolve towards this eternity in fact simply.We were, we are ,we shall be :) Jedis of the sphere :)

          The real meanings of informations of evolution by sortings, synchros,and superimposings take all their meanings.If we consider this gravitational aether instead of a luminifierous einsteinian aether,we see that informations are not only photonic but are in fact gravitational,that is why I beleive even that a photon in fact is a spheron coded,see that this gravitation balances this thermo heat and electromagntic forces of our sstandard model.Like if this zero absolute correlated with this gravitation permitted to photons to be what they must become.The informations so become complex and if we correlate with binar informations,that could converge if the quantum computing converges with the rotating 3D spherical volumes....The motions and mechanics are purely newtonian.That is why I beleive that modified newtonian mechanics MOND and this and that trying to explain this problem of rotations of galaxies without dark matter is a big error forgetting this zero absolute.I prefer the logic of Zwicky inserting this matter not baryonic for dark matter.A big puzzle in all case.

          Many thanks for your detailed comment, Steve ! Abraham Ibn Ezra says that one must be well versed in astronomy to understand the celestial magnificence in Psalm 19, that is the music of the celestial spheres. The hidden secrets of Biblical Scripture seem to be confirmed by such scientific discoveries as pulsars, gravitational waves, acoustic oscillations in the early universe, and solar ultrasound;celestial phenomena (Cepheid variables, RR Lyrae stars, solar ultrasounds, Baryon acoustic oscillations, pulsars, Gravitational waves)support your orchestra approach which actualizes the claccical view of the Phytagoreans. Best: stephen

          You are welcome Mr Ternyik,

          To be frank it is a real pleasure to discuss about faith and real meaning of entropy.It is rare and I must confess that I am happy to speak about this with somebody.Thanks for that.

          Best

          11 days later

          You wrote an excellent essay for this intellectual beauty contest. Best wishes to you...

          Your essay went into economics and Physics and biology...

          I request you also have look at my essay on Dynamic Universe model and give your esteemed opinion....

            Dear Stephen

            I read your essay and thanks for the observations you made; though I see time not moving from past through the present into the future but as the rate of change between two or more existents. The occurrence of a phenomenon in space is not due to a causale process. Reality is possible and not predetermined or necessary. i.e.causality is a special case in the occurrence of the phenomenon. the essay does not explains the sustainability of the self organization through its continuous change. there are millions of life forms that do not exists in our time and millions new ones that are formed and I don't think we have to bring G_D to their formation., the space full of infinite relations intrinsically posses the possibilities in the attributes of the movements.

            thanks

            yehuda atai

              Dear Yehuda ! Many thanks for your profound comments.I am in agreement with your statement that time is a human convention to distinguish the change of existents.The sustainability of self-organization by perpetual change, i.e. the interplay of matter and energy or space and motion, is due to dynamic efficiency or the optimization of a living systems energy transduction. If these events follow a random pattern or the workings of a creative upper force is indeed undecided. I am trying to bridge human (economic) systems and physical (natural) laws, in terms of cosmic principles. In the next 20 years, exponential knowledge automation will be an exciting field to study the organization principles of autopoeitic systems sustainability. Best wishes: stephen

              6 days later

              Stephen,

              Great to read such an original and unique essay and viewpoint, well written too. It also helped that I agreed most you wrote, though that isn't supposed to be a scoring criteria! Very refreshing and worth a higher score that it has. I also don't think brevity is an encumbance when the content is well packaged and valuable.

              I hope you may read, follow and comment on my own.

              Best of luck in the contest.

              Peter