Essay Abstract

Despite its deep-seated complexities, life and in particular human complex processes of mentation are thoroughly permeable to analysis on the basis of pure mathematical formalism. I will show in this thesis how abstract mathematical categories are perfectly appropriate to the analysis of the inception of human aims and intention.

Author Bio

Father of two. College education in Electrical Engineering and Laser Optics Engineering. Hold patent for a communication product by US Patent & Trademark Office. Several decades of research in system theory. Equally fluent in English, French, Spanish and Creole. Long time soccer fan, love watching soccer games in leisure time.

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Researcher Jean-Claude,

One real visible Universe cannot possibly have any invisible dual ontology.

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings such as the ones you effortlessly indulge in. As I have thoughtfully pointed out in my brilliant essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY, the real Universe consists only of one unified visible infinite surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light. Reality am not as complicated as theories of reality are.

Avoid watching Manchester City.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Brilliant Joe,

Just a few not so brilliant questions concerning your "thoughtful" essay:

1.- What is the cause of a surface?

2.- What does a surface consist of?

3.- Can a pure surface split from within its fabric or defoliate?

4.- How many different dimensions can there be to a surface?

5.- Could there be a mathematical description of any sort of surfaces?

6.- If you consider yourself to be mainly a surface, as I should conclude, how do aims and intentions arise from your surface or surfaces?

Thank you.

Joseph

PS: Manchester City soccer is not my favorite! am with you on that one!

______

    Hello Mr Jean-Claude,

    Thanks for sharing your work.I didn't well these cognitive sciences.It seems relevant considering the informations indeed and our consciousness.How we encode, how we sort? The human emotions and the consciousness evolve also.I lmiked your degrees of freedom and the categorification.That said how can we compute correctly these informations and emotions.I am persuaded that universalism and altruism are an entropical truth.How can we quantify the conscviousness ? it seems complex and iontriguing.That said if we consider that the rational categorifications are foundamen,tal and that the unconsciousness and evil comportments them are sorted,that becomes intriguing.The binar informations are different than our gravitational and electromagnetic photonic informations.That said that can converge in logic if the good foundamental parameters are the main domains.The spherical volumes could help with the Bloch sphères.The informations so can be quantified and even we could correlate with the quantum computing and the 3D sphères.The AI is one thing after all and the brain and consciousness an other.We can even rank the states of consciousness because of course all are not aware of this entropical irreversible truth.It is odd when we analyse the whole even.Thanks still for your work and good luck in this contest.

    Regards

    Dear Joseph,

    Thank you ever so much for reading my essay and for your probing questions.

    1. Unified infinite surface cannot possibly have had any sort of finite causation.

    2. There am only one unified infinite surface that am eternally apparent.

    3. One unified infinite surface am indivisible, but infinitely visible.

    4. Unified visible infinite surface occurs in one infinite dimension.

    5. Mathematics am the most effective weapon man has ever devised. It has lead inexorably to the manufacture of the hydrogen bomb.

    I must be surface because only surface exists. My only aim and intention am to convince as many people as I can that the real visible Universe am not mathematical. As I have thoughtfully pointed out in my brilliant essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY, the real Universe consists only of one unified visible infinite surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light. Reality am not as complicated as finite mathematical constructs are.

    I am about to watch Manchesty City lose to Totemham Hotspur.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    Hello Dufourny.

    Thank you for your wishes.

    I am well aware of your theory of universal ontology based on spheres.

    I hope that you can recognize from my writing that spherical symmetry (3-space symmetry based on one degree of freedom) is only one within a suite of 9 fundamental symmetries in nature. And as to our minds, spherical symmetry sustains only one instance of mentation, the one that materializes monocentric thoughts giving rise to instinctual and reflexive behavior.

    That is pretty far down from the ethics, altruism and universalism, which you referred to. Those are based on a richer symmetry owning 8 degrees of freedom, from the formula for symmetry modulus.

    To your question of how we can compute consciousness and emotional information, I have precisely shown that you can formulate them in terms of mathematical tensors. In the atlas, every slice stands for a form of thought and every slice represents a geometric entity that is subject to computation via the mathematics of tensors or even the calculus of surfaces of revolution.

    I appreciate and thank you for the attention that you have given to my essay.

    Cheers.

    Joseph

      Hi Joseph,

      You are welcome.

      about my theory of spherisation with quant and cosm 3D sphères Inside an Universal 3D sphere and my equation E=mc²+ml² :) Hope I am on the good road because if the universe is a square and that particles are points :) I am not on the good road.But in logic they turn so they are.

      About your works, I am not unfortunately good in computing,I am not good for mathematical détails in computing.That said I understand the whole and what is the computing in all humility and maths.I beleive strongly that maths are a wonderful tool and that computing is a wonderful invention,technological.Now about the simulations and about AI and consciousness, of course we are still at the begining of this sciences and correlated cognitive sciences.It is a new road of research.It seems complex.I liked your generality and your tool and method.Now I am not qualified to say if the degrees of freedom are computable.It seems difficult to quantify these emotions and to mimate the synaptic interactions.If we consider a mimating system due to automata due to algorythmic maths series ,so we can mimate if the good parameters are inserted.But what about the autonomy of a system without sortings and synchro?? it seems intriguing.Mimate seems possible, a consciousness I am doubting considering that the informations are differfent for biology.The evolution also must be considered and the numbers of particles composing an adn and brainsalso.The consciousness after all is a result of evolution with our brains.How can we consider what is consciousness ? just an electromagnetic effect due to electric informations in brains or are we more complex still due to gravitation and its informations.It is not easy to really encircle this consciousness.Why,How? we search answers after all.Good luck in this contest.Bestb Regards

      Joe,

      Your perspective is that of infinite or asymptotic mentation, one in which only the dimension of linear or planar surface exists, as the highest possible spatial expression. Evidently the self does not exist in that dimension, only the collective because it privileges spatial spread over all else; the self is so fused within the collective, for a vision of completely unified physical reality. That is why you prefer the tense "am" to everything you express, obliterating the distinction between other and self. For the same reason do you repetitively use the word brilliant to stress "luminous".

      If you look at my atlas of mentation, this form of mental fit corresponds to the suite of thoughts repertoried on the 9th layer, typified as infinite mentation. It is the predominance of these thoughts that constitutes the root of your philosophy.

      If you wanted to know the origin of intentions that surround your philosophy, as well as the mathematical basis to them (which you adamantly reject however), my essay gives you my 2 cents of clues!

      Thanks anyway for reading my essay, Joe. And congratulations on yours.

      Joseph

      ____________________________

      P.S. Mancester City could not beat Totemham!

      • [deleted]

      • Post #9

      I have thought a lot about évolution.We see on this Arrow of time that life is an emergent reality of encodings implying an increasing mass.We know 4,5 billions years ago the primitive soap with CH4 NH3 HCN H2C2 H2O ...have given amino acids and after unicells after pluricells sponges fishs reptilians mammalians hominids homo sopiens sapiens to make short in resume.We see that life evolves and that complexification is a reality.The brains also evolve and of course the consciousness seems correlated in a general point of vue.Of course now if we analyse at this moment the homo sapiens sapiens and the number of 7,5 billions of humans,and that we analyse the emotions and the cognitive sciences and the psychology.And if we insert the evolutive parameters ,that becomes a big puzzle considering the human comportments.The parameters of human comportments are complex.Sometimes I say me but why we have had these wars or why we have this evil, this unconsciousness ? Is it due to our reptilain brains ? the evil in this logic is dedicated to disappear when we correlate with this said universal consciousness.We can rank indeed these informations and it exists many informations even for emotions.But the universalism and altruism shall be in increasing like the mass.We evolve and the parameters of encodings and cognitive interactions are so numerous that it needs a real ranking.But what is a ranking ? how can we consider the importance of an information ? the spherical volumes perhaps ? If now we analyse more far in inserting this quantum gravitation,this weakest force and that we consider gravitational informations, so it becomes relevant about the Arrow of time.That is why I beleive that we die electromagnetically not gravitationally.Of course this analyse is a philosophical point of vue,but after all matter and energy are our only one reality.If the consciousness is correlated with our gravitational singularity, so the spherical volumes indeed could help for the importance of an information.A little like the postulates and universal laws,they are proved and verified.c G and h are constants proved.We could so give an imrportance in function of volumes for a rational thought.The degrees of freedom so could be ranked with these volumes.What do you think ?

      Dear Anonymous,

      What you are calling for is a theory of everything that can not only explains matter but life as well. A tall order. Best way to think about it is that the universe is deployed in a suite of Shells,from the infinitesimal quarks, to elementary particles, to atoms, to molecules to lattices to karyots to astral bodies to solar systems to galaxies to galaxy groups, etc. Each of these shells is based on a physical constant acting as an invariant in the role of building block for the Shell.

      How each Shell emerges from the previous is geared by the most fundamental of physical laws, which is a symmetry stack that is ubiquitous and from which the suite of physical constants arise at every step. The structure that conforms the phenomenon of human mentation i.e. is in essence no different than the one that organizes an atom. If you can spend some time on my paper, you will find all the elements of what I am attempting to explain here in a few words.

      Evil, as you mention, is part of the symmetry stack, a necessary ontological element among others that conforms every whole, as controversial as this may sound. I can assure you that if it were not for the many lysosomes in mother Theresa's body cells, which orchestrate timely destruction of their cellular hosts when these are damaged or become otherwise undesirable, her body would have become all malignant and succumb much before she could have done any of the good deeds she has spread around the world! Evil becomes a problem only in the context of correlational disjoint within the whole, as it starts acting on its own for its own and sole purpose, or a part of the whole is perusing it in disfavor of the whole. Evil as you say is incarnate in Layer 7 of the symmetry stack.

      As I told Dufourny, his spheres are only one aspect of reality: monocentric symmetry. You will not go very far with just that.

      I appreciate your feedback and your interest in the wider world out there!

      Bonsoir!

      Joseph

      _____________________________

        It was me the anonymous the crazzy spherical man ,Interesting Jedi ,but If I can.My sphères are real ,don't confound computing ,geometrical algebras and evolution.if you want to encircle the real encodins.I am doubting that the vectors and scalars with points can answer?It is a beautiful tool, that is all.Your symmetries are just that , a play of maths with computing.Me they turn so they are here is my equation E=mc²+ml² don't hesitate to ask détails ,I explain gravitation with humility.One aspect of the reality ??? and how they encode your quantum 3D sphères ,with binar informations it is that ? To you :)

        ps eden hazard to Debruyn, debruyn to lukaku,lukaku hazard ,hazard hazard mertens GOALLLLLLLLLL Belgium Belgium Belgium :)

        the problem is about the interpretation of an information.We have different informations ,the binar infromations,the electromagnetic informations and the gravitational informations.I see only a play for computing with for binar informations for automata and AI.I don't see a correlation with rotations of 3D sphères for example and their volumes.Where are the superimposings, the synchronizations, the sortings ? How the informations are encoded and sorted and why also ?Have we convergences with our 3D system? These informations and cognitive sciences are a big puzzle I agree but this puzzle seems respecting the newtonian laws of motions.They turn so they are after all these sphères.The combinations with motions of spherical volumes are infinite ....

        6 days later

        Joseph

        You seem to have devised an elegant math-model and then populated it with a wide assortment of seemingly random affective terms (after the fact) Where is your experimental proof that all this truly models the way the mind works ??

        Usually observations are made, then Math is devised to explain the data-set - NOT the reverse.

        John L

        www.world-peace.org

        www.forebrain.org

        http://youtu.be/gMSGoxUSYxk

          Fair objection, Jack. I have this to say.

          1.- No neuroscientist has yet proven causal relationship between cognition and brain activity, but only a correspondence relationship at best. That is why the two-century-long efforts by neuroscientists, physicists and others to unravel the mechanisms within the central nervous system that are responsible for the production of thoughts. In the lack of the above, the maps that you report, known ever since Cajal with little improvement over the decades, have no more solid experimental basis than the atlas of cognition that I have proposed.

          2.- My aim was not to propose a model of cognition based on neuronal anatomy, which is not the subject matter of assignment, but to present the structure of pure human cognition according to a fitting mathematical formalism, as I understand the subject matter to be.

          3.- The mentation atlas that I presented is not merely "populated after the fact with affective terms" as you put it. It is what you end up with when you attempt to normalize the repertory of human thoughts according to their phenomenological qualities, in almost the same manner as the normalization of population data, blood pressure in a population, individuals heights, IQ scores, etc. gives you a (normal) Gaussian Distribution. The latter stands for the most universal form of distributions, and it is amply grandfathered by the Quanto-Geometric Model I propose. I recognize that such novelty may and will meet resistance.

          4.- The encompassing cognitive triplet structure of conscious/semi-conscious/unconscious is universally recognized in all schools of psychology, while at the same time every human individual can attest to it from their own daily mental experience. I show how it can be narrowly apprehended from specific mathematical categories that are consistent as well with the distribution of thoughts, emotions and intentions. My vision only asks of anyone for recourse to introspection for corroboration and calls NOT for the sacrifice and torture of a single cat's brain.

          Now, if I wanted to present a correlated neuro-anatomical atlas to my mentation atlas, I could very eloquently do so based on experimental outcomes. But I would have been off-topic, don't you think, Jack?

          Again, I earnestly wish you good luck in this contest and appreciate the serious effort that you have shown in your essay.

          Joseph

          No Problem...

          Humanistic Psychology employs some Phenomenology-based qualitative research techniques that might lead to proving your theory (skipping the neurosci. approach altogether)

          Good luck

          John L *_^

          Quantum geometry of human cognition, in physical terms, is an ambitious research project; it is a 'practical' application of your general works, especially the book. The dual composition of the mathematical model is very reasonable as the mental forces of the human mind always work in opposite directions. Wishing you further success in developing 'cognitive physics', Joseph. Best: stephen

            Thank you, John, for the clue. But I am not afraid of the neurosci., just that it is a different slant on the topic.

            Hey, I have to say that your idea of Periodicity in neuro-anatomy is a great idea. A commendable attempt to bring this elusive science of cognition closer to the formalism of the hard sciences.

            Cheers.

            Joseph

            Thank you, Steve, for your wishes.

            I would be interested in exposing myself further to your vision, which I find quite appealing.

            If you have any other material published elsewhere, let me know.

            Thank you.

            Joseph