Thank you dear Branko for the kind comments.
Originally my paper is about 30 pages, so I had to delete many sections and cut others in order to make it fit the FQXI contest rules. That is why I removed the historical introduction which included references to the works of philosophers. In fact I held the view that although Newton's laws and theory of gravity lead to great industrial applications, but Leibniz monodology would have lead to quantum mechanics, and even quantum gravity, much earlier had it been given equal consideration. In some of the sections that I had to delete, I proved that monodology is the only way to explain E=mc^2 mathematically and philosophically, because it is based on discrete motion from zero to the speed of light (see E=mc^2).
To answer some of your other profound questions:
Yes I also believe that the cosmos is finite in all aspects, so there is no infinity or singularity, but the possibilities are infinite. So infinity may only be realized with the eternal flow of time, because the infinite possibilities may not exist at once or in finite time.
With longer discussion we can argue that the future is the vacuum with infinite possibilities that can be excited to the present, the present is energy or vibrations always moving at the speed of light, and the past is void with infinite mass that may never be excited again to the present. The limited energy and masses of particles and objects that we normally encounter are relative temporal excitations from the vacuum that are always collapsing again to the become void, though their apparent continuous presence is a result of them causing new excitations that appear very similar to them because of the conservation of energy, just like when we make a tone on a string: the first vibration ceases instantly but it causes a new vibration that takes the same form until it decay due external causes.
Therefore, you are absolutely right by saying that in practice there is no zero velocity, since there is always some motion. But also you should add that there is also no full speed of light, because it is always returning back to void by absorption for example, and that is why the speed of light in vacuum is 299792458 m/s, while I postulate that its full speed in absolute vacuum, or void, is exactly 300000000 m/s, because of the three dimensions of space to one dimension of time (I know you will say the meter and second are conventional, but this is a long argument).
So in in the ultimate metaphysical reality everything is instantly fluctuating between real rest and the real full speed of light, but in the measurable physical world neither limits are fully realized.
With my best Regards
