The Cosmic Computer: digital manipulation of matter, space and time by Mohamed Ali Haj Yousef

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Efthimios Harokopos;

Leibniz is not the fist philosopher to talk about monads, and the main idea here is the Single Monad, not the monads in general. Moreover, this essay is dedicated to study some of the consequences of the Single Monad Model which have been explained in other publications as referenced in this essay. I have discussed the various philosophical views and the history of monadology in chapter six of my book (The Single Monad Model of the Cosmos).

Best Regards

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Also I would like to mention that, just like the theory of monads, the doctrine of "continuous recreation" is not idea of Descartes, as he himself acknowledged. On the other hand, although the Single Monad Model view the cosmos as discrete instances in space, and therefore motion is only a change rather than transmutation, yet each subsequent instance is connected to the previous like the connection between a cause and effect, and that is because of the laws of conservation of energy and momentum. Therefore, this is different from the Occassionalism doctrine.

Harry Ricker III

HI, This is an interesting essay and might be well wroth thinking about, but I was unable to understand what if anything it had to do with the essay contest topic.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

I thank you Harry for your important note.

If all physical matter and space are manipulated on the deeper metaphysical level, this means that everything is predestined. The article clearly shows that despite all the apparent motion of particles and objects, effectively everything is at rest at every instance of the actual flow of time. Therefore, because of this zero instantaneous velocity all motions instantly amounts to zero, but the changes occur as a result or re-creation. This means that the cosmos is programmed to run in the way it is running, and we are like actors simply following one manuscript, each performing his or her own role with his own goals, but leading to the final total destination.

We can compare the cosmos to a movie or even a game that is displayed on a computer monitor, but the manuscript is manipulated inside the vertical hierarchy of this cosmic computer structure. This was already nicely demonstrated in the Allegory of the Cave in the Republic of Plato. Therefore, all the images and shapes that are displayed on the screen are pure simulation.

Muder Moldier

If everything is predestined, what is then the role of the players and how could they become responsible for their actions!

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Well Muder this is really a very tricky question, and I am no sure if my answer will be convincing, but I will try to answer in the form of a narration I have read in this respect about (maybe hypothetical) encounter on the judgement day between God and Lucifer who asked this question: "How come you punish me for something which you have preordained on me!" Then God answer: "When did you know that it was preordained? Before or after!", Satan said: "After!" So although everything is destined to be in the way is going to be, but everyone works only according to his/her own will, because at the time they don't know what was destined to be before it is.

Nature gives us certain limited choices and we choose to do one way or the other or even not to do, all under our own will, which what makes us responsible.

I hope this answer is convincing, but the issue is more complicated and it may lead way beyond the theme and beyond the laws of physics.

Muder Moldier

Thank you Dr. Yousef for answering my question. This distinction between before and after males the issue of free will and choice clear.

Janice Murin

I also found some difficulties in understanding the relation between this essay and the theme of the contest. However, after reading it again and reading your comments I now agree with you that we have no ultimate effect on the flow of things. Although we tend to believe that we can act on things, but eventually the cosmological goals will be fulfilled and our role is really minor.

Muder Moldier

Dear Dr. Yousef;

You mention in the abstract: "This innovative concept, which has an intrinsic arrow of time, will solve the problem of entropy and explain causality and non-locality and why the speed of light is the maximum cosmological speed limit". After reading the article, I can now understand why the speed of light is constant and invariant and how non-local quantum interactions could happen without breaking the light speed limit; which I think is a great achievement.

However, I don't know how can you explain causality, since it is itself a fundamental principle in physics and philosophy! I think that a principle can only be explained based on a deeper principle.

[deleted]

Indeed it is all the reason of continuous recreation that leads to all these astounding results, an even much more than what is mentioned in the abstract or even this short essay.

So because of the fact that the recreation takes time (the inner level of time) we have a maximum cosmological speed that can never be exceeded. And because of the resulting granular structure of space-time, we have discrete change and not continuous transmutation, which explains nonlocality without breaking this speed limit. Yet also in the same way now causality is a result of the conservation of energy between the consecutive discrete frames of space so that any perturbation in one frame will require synchronization in the following frames until the specific energy is dissipated into other points of space which may also not be directly connected through space or time, but by quantum entanglement.

Furthermore, we now don't need any inflation to explain why the cosmos is homogeneous or why its density is flat, because it is created instantaneously from the same single source, as if we have instantaneous (or eternal) inflation, which will also explain why we don't observe the magnetic monopole.

The cosmological constant problem can also be eliminated, simply because the ground state energy is the result of one single particle and not the sum of all particles because they are created in chronological sequence in the inner level of time.

I have tested this concept of the duality of time against all major problems in physics and cosmology, and, as far as I can clearly see, it solves them all!

Muder Moldier

This reply appears to me as "Anonymous", but I suppose the writer is the author of the article: Dr. Mohamed Haj Yousef.

If what you are saying is true, it will be the next Nobel prize!

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Yes I am the one who replied, yet I don't know why it appears as "Anonymous".

Satyavarapu Gupta

Recent experiments showed 'speed of light can be surpassed', this proposition as given in the start of Abstract is controversial ... see for example for super luminal neutrinos.......

arXiv:1109.5917v2 [hep-ph] 26 Oct 2011

arXiv:1109.4980v2 [hep-ph] 13 Jan 2012

arXiv:1109.5368v5 [astro-ph.HE] 31 Oct 2011

arXiv:1109.6930v3 [hep-ph] 8 Oct 2011

etc

Like all the models based on relativity, this model is also suffers experimental verification. I feel the approach like 'space and time different ' may be better.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Satyavarapu ;

I would like to thank you for commenting on this article, but I don't agree with your conclusion at all, because there is absolutely no verified experimental results of anything "travelling faster than light".

The faster-than-light neutrino anomaly that was observed by the OPERA experiment in 2011 has been falsified and the team themselves reported two flaws in their data.

Other reports may refer to some quantum phenomena as superluminal, but this is not "travelling faster than light". For example in EPR and quantum tunneling it is possible to communicate information non-locally. Galaxies could also apparently move faster than light but this is only due to the expansion of space.

So indeed there is no single experiment or theory which incorporates objects or particles with superluminal speeds.

Best Regards

Mohamed Haj Yousef

I would like also to add that if there was no cosmological speed limit then we must be able to observe superluminal speeds on large scale, for example at hundred times faster or even millions.

Of course it is generally accepted that the constancy and invariance of the speed of light is a cornerstone of modern physics.

Satyavarapu Gupta

Dear sir,

I hope you will get some time for your perusal on Dynamic Universe Model...

See the wiki page... for Neutrinos travelled faster than light....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_anomaly

... Said.."This comparison indicated neutrinos had arrived at the detector 57.8 nanoseconds faster than if they had been traveling at the speed of light in vacuum."

Your words.... "There is no single theory which incorporates objects or particles with superluminal speeds."

Please use Dynamic Universe Model. This single theoretical model's ...

Prediction of existence of large number of Blue shifted Galaxies came true. Prediction of "no dark matter" came true.

I hope you will see work on Astronomical Jets. You take ray of light or flow of neutrinos, or alpha particles parallel to plane of the Galaxy. Allow it to travel towards center of Galaxy. When that reaches center....WOOOOSH !... suddenly it turns its direction perpendicular to Galaxy center. See this paper

Explaining formation of Astronomical Jets using Dynamic Universe Model

http://viXra.org/abs/1606.0219

I actually observed super luminal velocities in astronomical jets. See these papers...

Explaining near light velocities observed in Astronomical Jets using SITA simulations

http://viXra.org/abs/1606.0232

Dynamic Universe Model solves 'Faster than Light Neutrinos' riddle

http://viXra.org/abs/1608.0313

Dynamic Universe Model is really wonderful; you have to SEE yourself to believe it....

See for an introduction...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

Jn Dynamic Universe Model....

..........No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many results published...

Many papers and books were published on Dynamic universe Model by the author on unsolved problems (of Bigbang) of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe

Have a look at:

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/10-feb-201-6-all-my-published-papers.html

Best Regards

=snp.gupta

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you dear Satyavarapu for the comment and suggestions with the links.

I will read further the links you provided, however single reports are not enough to make a theory that contradict an already established theory, that is the theory of relativity which is based on the invariance and constancy of the speed of light.

Moreover, I am not defending the speed of light itself as much as the cosmological speed limit, though they look the same so far, but what I mean is that if there was no cosmological speed limit we should be able to observe arbitrary high speeds that could several hundreds or thousands or much higher than the speed of light.

So in the end we clearly have a speed limit, and there is no model that could explain this apart from the Single Monad Model, or the continuous creation of space.

But anyway I thank you again for the links which I will look at later today as I am travelling now.

Best Regards

Mohamed

Janice Murin

All these FTL has been reported or examined, but non is truly faster than light:

1 FTL travel of non-information 1.1 Daily sky motion

1.2 Light spots and shadows

1.3 Apparent FTL propagation of static field effects

1.4 Closing speeds

1.5 Proper speeds

1.6 Possible distance away from Earth

1.7 Phase velocities above c

1.8 Group velocities above c

1.9 Universal expansion

1.10 Astronomical observations

1.11 Quantum mechanics 1.11.1 Hartman effect

1.11.2 Casimir effect

1.11.3 EPR paradox

1.11.4 Delayed choice quantum eraser

2 Superluminal communication

3 Justifications 3.1 Faster light (Casimir vacuum and quantum tunnelling)

3.2 Give up (absolute) relativity

3.3 Spacetime distortion

3.4 Heim theory

3.5 Lorentz symmetry violation

3.6 Superfluid theories of physical vacuum

4 Time of flight of neutrinos 4.1 MINOS experiment

4.2 OPERA neutrino anomaly

5 Tachyons

6 Exotic matter

7 General relativity

8 Variable speed of light

9 See also

10 Notes

11 References

12 External links 12.1 Scientific links

12.2 Proposed FTL Methods links

Satyavarapu Gupta

Hi all,

I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ...............reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc...just have a look at the essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....

I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Best wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please................

=snp. gupta

Muder Moldier

Dear Dr. Yousef;

I completely agree with you that there is no verified experimental results of anything "travelling faster than light". And you mentioned in one of your replies above that you "postulate that its (light) full speed in absolute vacuum, or void, is exactly 300000000 m/s, because of the three dimensions of space to one dimension of time". And that you don't think the definition of meter and second are conventional.

I would appreciate it if you could elaborate further on this issue!

Mohamed Haj Yousef

The standard value of the speed of light in vacuum is now considered a universal physical constant, and its exact value is 299,792,458 meters per second. Since 1983, the length of the meter has been defined from this constant as well as the international standard for time. However, this experimentally measured value corresponds to the speed of light in vacuum that is in fact not exactly empty, since it may have virtual particles or what is known as quantum foam. The true speed that should be considered as the upper Cosmological Speed limit is the speed of light in "void" rather than vacuum. Vacuum still has some energy that may interact with light, but void is real "nothing". Of course, even vacuum is very hard to achieve in labs, so void is really impossible.

The speed of light in the theoretical void is the absolute speed of the Single Monad that is necessarily in void, because it is the whole existence, and nothing is outside. In the Single Monad Model, the ultimate Cosmological Speed should be an exact integer ratio that is equal to "3", and it has no units because both space and time originate from the same revolution of the Single Monad that performs six basic revolutions to create the three dimensions of space, and then one revolution to display it as a single frame, and start anew. Because we naturally distinguish between space and time, this speed must be measured in terms of meters per second, and it should be therefore exactly equal to 300,000,000 meters per second. The difference between this value and the standard measured value, 299,792,458 meters per second, is what accounts for the quantum vacuum in contrast to the absolute void that cannot be excited.

Of course this all relates to how actually the "meter" and "second" are initially defined, which may look just as a result of local convention. The division of the day into hours, minutes and seconds is based on the sexagenarian system that was used by the Babylonians and can be also traced back to the Sumerians, while the "meter" is known to have been originally defined in 1793 as one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole, and then redefined or calibrated several times until it was fixed in 1983 as the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299792458 of a second. The Babylonian sexagenarian system is built around metaphysical principles that start by dividing the celestial orbs into twelve zodiac signs each of which takes thirty degrees which make a total of 360 degrees in the circle. The division of the day into 24 hours will need even more metaphysical reasoning which is beyond this discussion. It may suffice to mention here that "infinity" according to some Quantum Field Theories is considered equal to 1/12. Furthermore, although the definition of the meter has a completely different story but it looks also closely related to the above sexagenarian system, because for example a one-meter-long simple pendulum will have a period of two seconds when it oscillates in an arc of 30 degrees. Additionally, there are various speculations that connects the meter to the royal cubit that also equals the length of the above arc of 30 degrees when the radius of the circle is equal to one meter. All this within a possible small error because these definitions varied slightly over time.

However, apart from the above admittedly insufficient reasoning, we can reasonably ask why the current standard value of the speed of light is so close to 300,000,000 meter per second! The difference is only 0.0006918 %. If the meter and second are only defined conventionally, which happened well before the exact measurement of the speed of light, then how could they fit this big number within such a very small margin. Furthermore, we know now that vacuum is not all empty, so it must also have a small refraction index, since it may absorb light due to various reasons. This will bring the actual speed of light in void, rather than vacuum, even closer to 300,000,000 meter per second. Although we admit that all these speculations are not at all scientifically adequate, but it is clear that the speed of light in vacuum is related the ratio of three that the ratio of the three spatial over one temporal revolution of the Single Monad.

This the best I could say in this regard, and I admit that it is not scientifically rigorous yet.

Muder Moldier

Thank you Dr. Yousef, I think the subject requires a dedicated study, because I completely agree with you that the measured value of the speed of light is so close to 300000000 that it cannot be by chance, despite the fact that the meter was defined well before the measurement of the speed of light.

Janice Murin

How do you get infinity=1/12 ?

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Janice;

Thank you so much for commenting on this posts.

Regarding this question I would like to refer you to the following video:

Why -1/12 is a gold nugget and in fact there many similar videos which explain the idea. This idea I think it was first devised by the famous mathmetician Ramanujan.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

The above video explains that 1+2+3+4+....=-1/12

So I am sorry it is -1/12 and not +1/12, but either way I think it gives us some hint why the zodiac is divided into 12 signs.

Paulan Moldier

I agree that there is nothing that can move faster than light.

However, I don't understand what this has to do with the dimensions of space and the relation that you put above:

1+2+3+4+....=-1/12

And how thins equation could be true!

Janice Murin

Thank you for replying, I have not seen this before, because it was not displayed.

Muder Moldier

The principle of re-creation is traced back into many ancient philosophies, and also the monads. The Greeks have most likely inherited that from Egyptian or Babylonians. Parmenides was famous for such views, and all his students including Plato who have actually transferred it to the West.

Muder Moldier

Dear Dr. Yousef... I found on your website that you have a book called "the cosmic heart", but I could not find this book on the internet. Could you please send me the link or information on how to get it?

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Muder;

Thank you for this inquiry.

Actually this book is not ready yet. I am in the process and I think it might take a year before it is pub;ished. If you leave a note on the website or send me your email I will inform you when it is ready.

Best Regards

Mohamed

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Here you can read more about this book () which is actually based on the same idea presented in this essay.

The conceptual conflict between the Quantum and Relativity theories is the modern version of the recurring ancient philosophical competition between the continuum and discrete views of matter. The problem is that these two contrasting views are mutually exclusive, yet each one alone is not capable of describing the whole reality.

Therefore, any successful Theory of Everything must not rely on either the continuum or discrete space-time. Rather, these two contrasting views must be the product of such theory, and they must become complementary in the microscopic and macroscopic scales. The only contestant that may fulfill this criterion is "Oneness", because on the multiplicity level things are either discrete or continuous, there is no other way.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Sorry the link did not appear! here again: The Cosmic Heart

Janice Murin

I am eagerly waiting to read this book.

« Previous Page Next Page »