The Cosmic Computer: digital manipulation of matter, space and time by Mohamed Ali Haj Yousef

Mohamed Haj Yousef

I am sorry the link was broken, here again I hope it will work:

I would like to share with you this video presentation by prof. Haider Khan. His discussion in this short video is right into the point of what I am trying to show of the relation between time, space, and matter, which is based on [link:www.amazon.com/Mohamed-Haj-Yousef/e/B001JS2LC2"> Ibn Arabi-Time and Cosmology[/link] and he puts it in the context of the theory of relativity.

Muder Moldier

Thank you Dr. Yousef; I always thought that super-strings is the scientific version of the "science of letters" which I also think it is related to they philosophical theory of Pythagoras.

Janice Murin

Thank you for posting this video, it is very nice.

Janice Murin

Dear Dr. Yousef;

So according to your model; is space and time discrete or continuous?

Regards

Mohamed Haj Yousef

In this model of continuous space construction, multiplicity is revealed through the inner level of time, and then evolves over the outer level. Although the reality of time in both levels is discrete, on the inner level, where space and matter are constructed, space will appear potentially continuous due to the vast possible manifestations that spread over the three outward dimensions and any other inward curled dimensions. Eventually, the ultimate structure of space could be discrete below the Planck distance as it is commonly believed, though this is still an open question, but in my opinion it is not, because the potential possibilities are always infinite regardless of scale. The same could also be said about the outer level of time, which will also appear potentially continuous, and is expected to be discrete below the Planck time. The difference happens only when we make an observation or measurement, because the possibilities will be now confined and mostly the particle nature will be revealed. Even when waves are observed they are still confined in a region of space in which the field will take certain finite values each of which is inevitably represented by some confined particles or finite space points.

Janice Murin

thank you

Paulan Moldier

I believe that space is continuous, but time is discrete.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

According to the SMM, space is rigid time.

Munrid Qaraq

Dear Dr. Yousef;

I was very happy to come across your article.

It is really very interesting and I am enjoying the discussion.

I just scanned your replies, but I will study them carefully because I believe your model really solves many problems and answer many deep questions.

Meanwhile, can I ask you if this idea of the duality of time has ever been proposed before?

Many Thanks

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Munrid;

Thank you for your positive comments, and I am looking forward to answer your questions when you study the article and comments.

To answer your question above: As far as I am aware, the concept of the duality of time has never been proposed or discussed by anyone before.

However, if you think about it is equivalent to, but more realistic than, the inflation scenario by Alan Guth. The reason is that inflation leads to eternal inflation or infinite hypothetical multiverse. The duality of time, which is part of the Single Monad Model, solves all the problems solved by inflation because the cosmos is re-created, or inflated, from the single monad every instance of time.

Best Regards

Muder Moldier

>> ...the Single Monad Model solves all the problems solved by inflation because the cosmos is re-created, or inflated, from the single monad every instance of time.

Amazing, absolutely amazing. REALLY AMAZING! I believe this is Nobel prize model. I can see it very clearly. It is a matter of time.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you Muder, I will share it with you!

Munrid Qaraq

I completely agree with Muder, it is the first time I see a model so simple and could solve many major problems so easily.

Paulan Moldier

This essay deserve the first prize for sure.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you Paulan.

Munrid Qaraq

Dear Dr. Yousef, I completely agree with your response above for the question related to the deficiency of mathematics since it must use some kind of approximation such as that used in differentiation or integration. But does that mean that the reality can not be described by mathematics?

Mohamed Haj Yousef

On the contrary, I believe the reality is mathematical, but the current mathematics that is based on continuous space-time is not adequate.

I believe that mathematics should be granular the same as reality. I think that the reality is only made of natural numbers: 1, 2, 3, ... Irrational numbers are the problem, although they are a necessity, but they cause infinities which do not belong to the real world. So they must be viewed as approximation and not facts. In reality there is only number "one" and then "zero" is its absence. This "one" is then multiplied in space which produce numbers that then evolve in time. Negative numbers are only relative, and so are the irrationals.

Janice Murin

Every single word of this is worth to be written in gold

....>

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you Janice, truth is brilliant. It shines of its own right. It is more precious than gold. That is why the joy of knowing is invaluable.

Muder Moldier

reality is digital

John Murelle

Reality is neither analogue nor digital, it is ONE.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

I agree with you John, 100%.

However, if reality remained in the oneness state the world would not appear.

So what happens is that the fluctuations between one and zero, or existence and nonexistence is what creates the multiplicity of things.

Janice Murin

Thank you for replying, I have not seen this before, because it was not displayed.

Muder Moldier

Dear Dr. Haj Yousef;

The main idea in your model is the continuous creation of matter.

Does this somehow match the eternal inflation or what is known as chaotic inflation theory?

Regards

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Dear Muder;

The main motivation behind inflationary scenarios is to solve the horizon problem, or why the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. This problem is solved by the single monad model, or the continuous creation, because, no matter how large and complex it might be, and thus how long it might take to be created in the inner level of time, the creation is still instantaneous on the outward level that we encounter. In fact the perfect cosmological principle might also hold true, which means that, on the large scale, the universe can be homogeneous in time as well as in space, as it is predicted by eternal-inflationary models.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

The duality of time, can be considered an alternative realistic scenario to eternal inflation, because by replacing inflation in the outer (physical) level of time with continuous creation from one single point in the inner metaphysical level, the universe will still be finite because multiplicity is only observed at the outer level. In fact, this scenario can also be considered as alternative to the cyclic, or oscillating, models considered by early theoretical physicists, including Einstein, but those models failed because they violate the second law of thermodynamics. The duality of time, however, does not only comply with this law, but it can also explain why entropy can only increase because of this intrinsic arrow of time on the inner level. With this continuous creation scenario, the universe oscillates between the instances of the outward level of time, without reversing the entropy because this process of continuous space construction is metaphysical since it is performed by one single monad .

Paulan Moldier

You are right, he posted the same comment in almost all other essays!

Paulan Moldier

This interesting, I used to think of vacuum and void as the same thing.

Paulan Moldier

I believe all previous civilizations had deep philosophy and understanding of the cosmos, maybe much deeper than what we have, simply because they were less materialistic.

On the other hand; when you examine ancient philosophies you see similar patterns of thought that have dominated over the millennia. Yet we come to believe that we are more advanced despite that we are working in other directions. I think we are bein arrogant and wrong.

« Previous Page Next Page »