The Processes of Life from Model Mechanics by Ken Hon Seto

Dear Dr. Seto,

Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine essay.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about imaginary invisible quantum particles.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Dear Ken Hon Seto,

The contest FQXi is a competition of ideas. You give original ideas. It's the most important.Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

Dear Seto

Your concept "Cosmological Repulsive Effect (CRE) Force" is good for explaining attractive and repulsive forces at electron proton levels. But at distant Galaxy level it is not required.

Lets do a small experiment which we did in our school days. Take a bucket and half fill it water. Tie a string to the handle; hold it with your hand. Now spin around yourself. As you gain speed the bucket will be lifted up to the level of your shoulders or neck. But water will not fall from the bucket due to centrifugal and centripetal forces.

For a two body problem gravitation and tension in the rope are these centrifugal and centripetal forces. But when there are multiple number of bodies then we can use Dynamic Universe Model.

The bodies in the universe will not collapse into a central mass when there is non- uniform matter density. Papers were published by Dynamic Universe Model on this subject many years back. When there is uniform density distribution of matter, the whole matter will collapse. We can visualize matter distribution is non-uniform. Vacuum density and moon density are different. There are huge voids to huge super cluster structures of Galaxies in the UNIVERSE, They cannot be called uniform density as claimed by other models. All these papers were available from VIXRA or from the Dynamic Universe Model Blog.

And similarly, your words ...

"1998 when two independent groups of astronomers discovered that the Universe at the far reached regions is in a state of accelerated expansion.".... It is good you thought of this. But I request you to see my posts in this forum http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2726

Observed accelerated expansion of the universe in far-field supernova observations, are easily explained using observed 'Blue shifted Galaxies' at doi ... dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojmsi.2017.51009 in Jan 2017.

'The cosmological constant, dark energy" are not required and are not present in Dynamic Universe Model. And the observed Hubble constant is different in every twenty years for the last 120 years...

I hope you will do slight changes in your nice work accordingly...

Dear Mr. Seto,

I enjoyed this essay, as I have other essays of yours. I find your work stunningly original. I can't myself determine whether your theories are correct. But I am so pleased that there are scientists approaching old problems from new angles. A unified theory is a worthy goal--and few minds are able to propose one. Thanks for your inspiring work.

I thought your paper was really cool. I have a hard time understanding some of the math but I believe I got most of the big ideas. I have a few questions for you to answer if you like...

Do you think gravity is sound vibrations?

Are the e strings laid out in a mesh pattern (like a window screen)?

Is the evolution that God (and I believe it is he and she - light and darkness) designed for consciousness (I AM / one thought = Infinite thoughts) evolving back to Oneness... that split apart in the beginning to create the physical universe? Could it simply be the division of conscious light that created everything we perceive from our senses?

Good luck with your essay,

William Walker

Hey Ken,

Thanks for the response...

yes that one equation... I am just horrible at math formulas so you probably won't be able to explain it so that I could understand it. Plus I have no formal training beyond H.S. math / physics, so I am trying to learn :)

That's what I thought too with the stings laid out with a vertical axis and a horizontal axis. X & Y

I guess my theory is that all forces whether they attract or repel are frequencies - which I'm assuming is the f in your equation. And if everything is a frequency - then wouldn't everything be some form of sound vibration? Even gravity?

So God (consciousness) in my estimation is all sound frequencies... and God went from one frequency (I AM)...in the beginning... to all frequencies (Infinity)... which was TMI... but then balanced them out by separating these frequencies into visible light and hiding a lot of the frequencies in dark matter creating the spatial universe we see today dominated by darkness.

And I promise not to bug you after this... I'm sure we could continue to infinity and beyond ;)

Best of luck in the contest!

Ken,

I read through the comments before reading your paper, encouraged by the feedback of its originality. It's very true, you've put considerable work into a fresh idea.

I'm at the tip of the iceberg reading through some of the entries in this community (new to it), but it is refreshing to see unique approaches to problems. And the problem that you are trying to tackle - finding cracks in the Standard Model of particles and forces - is the same one that I've been tackling as well. It's fun to see new ideas.

I admit that our approaches are quite different, but there were two similarities that I found in your paper. I do agree that there is a medium (your E-matrix) for light to travel across the universe. It still amazes me that the aether was disregarded long ago. And I also agree with you that there is a fundamental particle (what you called the S-particle) if we continue to dig deeper.

On that last note of finding a fundamental particle, you might have interest in some work that I've been doing with my colleagues:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2765

Regards,

Jeff

Hello Mr Hon Seto,

congratulations.You had analysed this emergent consciousness with a wonderful creativity playing with strings and this infinite entropical potential if I can say.The matrix of informations and how you interpret it was a relevant reading.

Thanks for sharing and good luck in this contest.

Hi Ken,

You are welcome.I liked it.It is nice, I am interested to know more ,it seems relevant in a general point of vue.

you can send me it. my mail is dufournybionature@gmail.com

Regards

Hi Ken,

Nice to read about your interesting theory again, written in such a clear and well organized way and modified to address the topic. The 'geometrical pattern imprint' solution to memory and consciousness is in agreement with my own.

Indeed I think and hope you'll enjoy reading mine as it shows that the mechanistic solutions we both promote can remove all the weirdness and confusion in quantum mechanics. I also address why it's so difficult for new theoretical approaches to get more that glimpsed by mainstream. I think mankind must learn to employ more rational organised thinking as opposed to the primevally evolved 'instant' pattern matching we agree on.

Very well done.

Peter

Hi Ken Hon Seto,

Your model mechanics assumes a light-carrying medium called ether. Could you please expain to me how to interpret the outcomes of the famous experiment by Michelson in 1881/1887?

Regards,

Eckard Blumschein