Essay Abstract

Fundamental knowledge endures deep conceptual crisis manifested in total crisis of understanding, crisis of interpretation and representation, loss of certainty, troubles with physics, crisis of methodology. Crisis of understanding in fundamental science generates deep crisis of understanding in global society. What way should we choose for overcoming total crisis of understanding in fundamental science? It should be the way of metaphysical construction of new comprehensive model of ideality on the basis of the modified ontology. Result of quarter-century wanderings: sum of ideas, concepts and eidoses, new understanding of space, time, consciousness.

Author Bio

Independent researcher since 1989: ontology, philosophy of physics and mathematics, philosophy of consciousness, member of XX World Congress of Philosophy (Boston, 1998), I-IV Russian Philosophical Congress (1997-2005), The First Conference "Philosophy of Physics: actual problems"(2010), The Third Russian Conference "Philosophy of Mathematics: actual problems" (2013), International Congress "Fundamental Problems of Natural Science and Technology"(2016).

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Vladimir

I welcome your article as a professional and serious work. For me personally, it is very important that you are well aware of the global crisis of our time, which seems to almost in all spheres of human activity. Well I try to understand the deep meaning of your work to evaluate it by its significance.

Best wishes

    Dear George!

    Thank you for your comment. I also congratulate you on the participation in the Contest and the first high evaluation. I began to read your essay and see your deep critical look at all the "trouble with physics." I think that the competition helps sharpen all of the most acute problems in the fundamental science and society.

    Good luck in the Сontest!

    Yours faithfully,

    Vladimir

    Dear, Mr. Rogozhin

    We can not see the world as whole.But we can see the relationship between the whole and the parts.

    Regards,

    Branko

      Dear Dr. Rogozhan,

      Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine essay and I do hope that it fairs well in the competition.

      Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

      One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about imaginary invisible "metaphysical construction of new comprehensive model of ideality on the basis of the modified ontology."

      The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

      A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.

      Joe Fisher, Realist

      Dear Branko,

      If we plant the grape seeds in the ground and irrigate with water, then we will see the grapevine and grapes. Then we make a good wine, gather friends together and see all the living world as whole. Constructive metaphysics of process Music Poetry helps to see the world as whole. Many thanks!

      Vladimir

      Dear Vladimir,

      Thank you for your comments on my essay.

      I found your essay very well researched and informative. Maybe you could have added a bit more of your personal view on the subject.

      All the best,

      Patrick

        Dear Patrick,

        Thank you for your comments and suggestions. You'll notice that the last two chapters of my essay - entirely my ideaы. Main of them is fully original - ontological construction of the primordial generating structure.

        Sincerely, Vladimir

        Dear Joe,

        Thank you for your comments and observations. I fully agree that the principle simplicity is one of the basic principles of Nature. The dialectical principle of triunity (super principle) brings together all the principles of the ontological basis of Nature. I will read your essay in a short time. Sincerely, Vladimir

        Dear Dr. Rogozhan,

        Thank you for your comments and your interesting paper.

        I scanned your paper. I am a physicist and not a philosopher. For every sentence that a philosopher writes, I need to read a book to understand what he is stating. I like to have my models very simple. Only in that condition, I can comprehend and apply these models.

        I am convinced that something created the environment that I can observe. My model of this creation uses the fact that this creator did his job in one stroke and in that act, he also stored the result in a repository. If I observe my environment, then I see that all discrete objects are either modules, or they are modular systems. A set of elementary modules exists that constitute all other modules and the modular systems. These elementary modules are pointlike, and their location is stored in the repository together with a scalar timestamp. My environment also contains continuums, and one of these continuums embeds all modules. The embedding process affects the embedding continuum. This image is a rather simple world-picture. It is fairly easy to catch it in a mathematical model. That mathematical model is a structure that implements the repository. However, one thing is very mysterious. This structure does not contain any means that generate the locations of the elementary modules such that the whole behaves in a dynamically coherent fashion. Mechanisms that apply stochastic processes must perform that job. These Mechanisms reside outside of the repository. The interesting point here is that none of the physical theories that I know of treats these mechanisms. Without these mechanisms, the model does not show relevant dynamic behavior and will certainly not show dynamically coherent behavior.

        I encountered the effects of these mechanisms during my job as a developer of image intensifier devices. These devices offer a direct look at quantum behavior. In my opinion, the stochastic processes belong to the category of inhomogeneous spatial Poisson point processes that own a characteristic function.I derive this from the fact that the visual trajectory of all vertebrates is optimized for perception under low dose rate conditions.

          Dear Hans,

          Thanks for reading my essay and deep explanatory comment. Our philosophies are very close in spirit and orientation, so your conclusions are clear to me. Especially your ideas, which I noted in the previous comments on your blog. I construct my model based on a modern interpretation of the ontological "celestial triangle" (Plato), one axiom, a principle of ontological and dialectical unification of matter at all levels of the Universum existence. This is the extreme simplicity (Occam's razor the sharpest), taking into account existing knowledge and traditions. if possible, vote my essay.

          Yours faithfully,

          Vladimir

          Nice Philosophical essay sir...

          Your words in page 7 and 8....

          "2. Method of ontological constructing of a symbol-attractor of the primordial generating process of the Universum being as a whole. The total unification of matter at all levels of the Universum.

          3. Basification of mathematics (knowledge) is the ontological construction of intrinsic framework, carcass and foundation, and representation in basic (ontological) mathematical symbol." ... are really correct. Universe is singleone

          Have a look at my essay also...

            Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

            Thanks so much for your important comment. You have noted the main thing - the problem basification of mathematics, and hence knowledge as a whole. Today, the foundations of science from the "granite", it is necessary to make it more robust - to transform the "granite" in the "basalt"... The world picture of physicists and poets should be united and filled with the senses of the "LifeWorld" (E.Husserl).

            I read your essay in the near future.

            Yours faithfully,

            Vladimir

            I read your essay «Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe» and remember Rabindranath Tagore, taking into account the idea of the unity of knowledge, my concept of the ontological (structural, space) of memory, Raj Kapoor's song '50s, which is very loved in Russia, and the theme of the contest:

            «Tired in my way I asked the destiny:

            "Who pushes me in my back so ruthlessly?" -

            "Look back!" - I look - and the complaint ceases:

            It is my past who pushes me forward.»

            I wish you good luck!

            All the Best,

            Vladimir

            Grape seed, which Bulat Okudzhava buries into the warm soil gives an insight into the nature of physical constants, time, meaning, aspiration of being of the Universe to the "LifeWorld "(Husserl)

            «I will bury a grape seed into the warm soil,

            And will kiss the vine, and pluck the ripe bunches.

            And will gather my friends, attune my heart to love,

            Otherwise, why do I live on this unchanging earth?

            Gather on, my guests, to my feast,

            Tell me straight to my face who am I known to be among you.

            King of Heaven will forgive me my sins.

            Otherwise, why do I live on this unchanging earth?

            In her dark-red my Dali 1 will be singing for me,

            In my black-and-white I will bow my head before her,

            I will listen, captivated, and will die of love and sorrow,

            Otherwise, why do I live on this eternal earth?

            And when the sunset will swirl, drifting about the corners,

            Let the visions float by me time and again:

            Blue buffalo, and white eagle, and golden trout,

            Otherwise, why do I live on this unchanging earth?» (Bulat Okudzhava)

            Dear Vladimir Rogozhin,

            A

            Thank you very much for such a moral support. I went to the link you mentioned above http://homepages.xnet.co.nz/~hardy/cosmologystatement.html . Though it was a old petition it is exactly correct even today. No research is supported even morally which is against Bigbang. Forget about the funding. I also tried to sign it, but it is going somewhere.

            This statement tells about an important aspect...."FUNDING"... Who so ever is funding this research thinks against the science or technology. The funding persons think that the contrary to science to be proved. Science tells that if there is an experiment, it should give same results to anyone. Science should not predict imaginary things. It should be real. History says even Einstein did not like and did not support Bigbang based Universe models.

            For the last 25 years I faced the same problem. Main stream people appreciated me in the front and they always laughed at me at the back. No support of any type. Now I am getting worried, as I am getting aged, to whom I will give out all this knowledge. So I kept all my BOOKs and PAPERs in my webpage for any person at free of cost. He doesn't even need to inform me about his downloads.

            Thank you for giving me high ranking. I am also giving ranking to your essay.

            B

            Spasibo vam balshoy...Many thanks...

            I was in USSR, Kiev for 6 months in 1982. I used talk and read Russian ok. Ya Jabil poruski...I forgot most the Russian language. I am still having many Russian friends, who contact me regularly. May be I will visit Kiev once again.....

            Thank you very much for taking me back into such wonderful nostalgic memories.

            Raj kapoor's ... 'Avaara hu..' song, Rabindra nath Tagor's ... "Where the mind is without fear poem".... Indian philosophical thoughts....

            I also liked the present concept of theme of FQXi contest... I got a wonderful experience of going into thoughtful wisdom of multitude of thinkers... very nice!

            I wish you Good luck....

            Best Regards

            Snp.gupta

            Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

            Thank you for your insightful comment. You are absolutely right. For the successful development of fundamental science should be supported by several competing paradigms, including funding for research in different directions. Open contests of the FQXi promote competition of ideas, and this is very important. I wish you success in the Contest and the promotion of your theory.

            Yours faithfully,

            Vladimir

            Vladimir,

            At first read it was great, well done. I found no concept or argument I could disagree with. I must say your use of language and 'holistic' style defeated speed reading though did convey the 'four centuries of wanderings'.

            The problem remains; how do we overcome the problem! Flawed theory seems ever more deeply entrenched and our systems mean most editors and senior academics have negative motivation to change to allow advancement.

            I offer one idea in terms of 'self evolution' of thinking methodology which I hope you may comment on.

            I'll try to get back to yours to penetrate more deeply later.

            Well done.

            Peter

              Dear Peter,

              Thank you for your insightful and inspiring comment. I began to read your essay.

              Yours faithfully,

              Vladimir

              Vladimir

              Glad you were inspired. My 2nd reading was easier, founded on the neural path laid by the first. I found some inspiration myself in the likes of;

              'The physics of particles informs us, strictly speaking, on fundamental structures of the nature, but not on fundamental particles.'

              Which agrees with my identification of Maxwells 2nd momenta missed by Heisenberg. And;

              'Real progress will consist in very serious fight of science with religion which will end with their integration'

              Thank you. I hope you do well in the contest and avoid the trolls still relying on the primeval thinking mode (I've exposed 2 so far).

              Peter