Dear Eckard Blumschein,
It is a nice and thought provoking essay. Thank you for sharing such nice thoughts. I am writing below some points from your essay...........
Real good points from your essay are....
1. Lagrangian [1], Hamiltonian, path integral, and boundary element method don't make real time useless. The words wandering, towards, and goal in the topic correspond to the dynamic view by Heraclitus in contrast to the static existence monism by Parmenides. In common sense there is no doubt; Zeno's paradoxes show that Parmenides and his supporters including Einstein took an unreasonable position akin to fatalism
2. God created man as a copy of His own does perhaps mean, man created God as his copy.
3. Notions like point or infinite are reasonable idealizations on a sound logical basis. However, they must not be naively attributed to reality. The other way round, it is also unreasonable to try and forge fundamentals of mathematics as to agree with real structures.
I am just adding some more points for further debate...
a. Denial of evolution implies the so called block universe that assumes time as eternally extending between minus and plus infinity with no beginning and no end.
.............Time will not go back, we can see earlier times (like yesterday) as history only. There is no going back in time except in science fiction movies. Going into earlier times is not possible..........
b. Empedocles' theory of evolution by trial and error led Kant and Laplace to cosmogony already before Darwin boosted it. Cosmogony is the thinking that the whole universe was born at a single time.
.............But the Galaxies born at different times and the Galaxies quench at different times, makes this thinking is not correct.....................
c. Cosmogonists think 'The universe could have contained the singularity because the universe evolved or changed from a prior state (the prior state was "empty space", or maybe a state that could not be called "space" at all).' These cosmogonist philosophers think that no experiment is necessary, as universe was created by will of Gods probably....
..... There is much experimental evidence against this type of thinking is it not.............
d. "....Amount and width of not yet filled gaps in the imaginable evolution from cosmology up to miracles of human brain are decreasing. Among them is the step from a-biological self-organization in physics and chemistry to self-reproducing plants and animals......."
Why to think that way, ... probably the Universe had a mind that produces Galaxies, the same thing continued in smaller things also probably
e. The spatial aspect of such reality is isotropy.
........... Isotropy is not there in the Universe