Brilliant stuff, full of wise and pertinent analysis excellently argued and written. I particularly thank you for the Heraclites quote, which I hadn't seen before but his description pre-empts my recycling mechanism for galaxies and unverses! www.academia.edu/6655261/A RECYCLING MODEL ALSO PRODUCING THE 'AXIS OF EVIL' AND GALAXY BARS
I found most excellent but it did rather over-extend and loose rational coherence when trying to explain the 'counterfactual' and 'spooky action at a distance' interpretations of QM's findings.
However neither of those are necessary! as I've now shown both arise from using the wrong starting asssumptions! i.e. NOT describing any 'particle' dynamics, except assuming it can't be orbital angular momentum (OAM) because a 'single' momentum can't reproduce the weird findings.
Well here's the thing; OAM does NOT just have ONE momenta! Sure it has up/down linear momenta at the equator, but it ALSO has Maxwell's 'curl', which is orthogonally inverse!!. (try to tell me if any point on the equator is revolving clockwise or anticlockwise and the truth may dawn).
No 'spooky action at a distance' is then needed. Pairs share a spin axis, and findings are 'realtive' to detector orientation. So at identical EM dial settings A & B will always find the opposite, or if one is reversed, the same. Each particle therefore DOES hold 'both' sets of information! Just look from different angles - as your introduction tells us. Of course that's too important a discovery for most to notice. My essay also explains why. A few have and I think and hope you will too.
Anyway what it means is that the 'weaker' over-extensions of yours to try to tackle the muddy illogical metaphysical interpretations are unnecessary, acting as a 'proof' to leave the majority clarified and shining brighter.