Essay Abstract

All the information of the past is perceived and identified as past facts that can help us to predict the future. Both past and future are emergent phenomena. We argue that the life-line from an observer is only one of an infinity of availabilities in a time and space-less Hilbert Space that we call Total Simultaneity (TS). The specific emergent life-line we are experiencing is the result of a by time and space constrained form of consciousness, entangled with Total Consciousness (TC) in TS. Both Time and space are models that emerge from consciousness. TS is a set of an infinity of probabilities/availabilities called Eternal NOW Moments (ENM), comparable to singularities. Our experience of time (and so of our life-line) is essentially "happening"as an emerging singularity of time out of TS. We argue that the "thinking" of consciousness about ideas happening in the emergent NOW , reveals in TS the probability of these ideas. Emergent life discloses the choices of free will at any ENM in TS. Better understanding the real nature of TS will bring us closer to the awareness that the specific emergent life line we experience NOW is only a minuscule part of the endless set representing the Total YOU in TS.

Author Bio

Independent researcher. Alumnus Technical University of DELFT.

Download Essay PDF File

Wilhelmus,

Brilliant stuff, full of wise and pertinent analysis excellently argued and written. I particularly thank you for the Heraclites quote, which I hadn't seen before but his description pre-empts my recycling mechanism for galaxies and unverses! www.academia.edu/6655261/A RECYCLING MODEL ALSO PRODUCING THE 'AXIS OF EVIL' AND GALAXY BARS

I found most excellent but it did rather over-extend and loose rational coherence when trying to explain the 'counterfactual' and 'spooky action at a distance' interpretations of QM's findings.

However neither of those are necessary! as I've now shown both arise from using the wrong starting asssumptions! i.e. NOT describing any 'particle' dynamics, except assuming it can't be orbital angular momentum (OAM) because a 'single' momentum can't reproduce the weird findings.

Well here's the thing; OAM does NOT just have ONE momenta! Sure it has up/down linear momenta at the equator, but it ALSO has Maxwell's 'curl', which is orthogonally inverse!!. (try to tell me if any point on the equator is revolving clockwise or anticlockwise and the truth may dawn).

No 'spooky action at a distance' is then needed. Pairs share a spin axis, and findings are 'realtive' to detector orientation. So at identical EM dial settings A & B will always find the opposite, or if one is reversed, the same. Each particle therefore DOES hold 'both' sets of information! Just look from different angles - as your introduction tells us. Of course that's too important a discovery for most to notice. My essay also explains why. A few have and I think and hope you will too.

Anyway what it means is that the 'weaker' over-extensions of yours to try to tackle the muddy illogical metaphysical interpretations are unnecessary, acting as a 'proof' to leave the majority clarified and shining brighter.

Very Best

Peter

    Dear Peter,

    As I explained in my essay the solution you are proposing is "available" in TS, like every idea that emerges from human thinking, yours as mine is just another path of probabilities. Indeed bothe "particles" (emerging phenomenae) hold both sets of information in TS. There is nothing muddy metaphysical in this perception, and when it is it is one of the infinity of answers we are looking for...

    I am gonne read your interpretation now..

    best regards

    Wilhelmus

    Hello Mr De Wilde,

    Happy to see yopu again on fqxi.I liked your essay ,it is general and full of relevances.Thanks for sharing your thoughts.Good luck in this contest.

    All the best from belgium

      Dear Steve,

      I am happy that you are doing well in your Subjective Simultaneity Sphere.

      Good to hear from you. Thanks for the time you took to read my interpretation of reality.

      best regards

      Wilhelmus

      Thanks ,I am a little better psychologically speaking.I have had many personal problems,but that goes,I have faith in this sphere.

      You are welcome Wihelmus,I have always liked your interprétations of our physics.The philosophy and sciences dance together ...

      I liked indeed this subjectivity and how you have interpreted the reality.We have all our own subjective sphere after all :)

      Best

      Dear Mr. Wilhelmus de Wilde

      If I can help about your "thoughts".

      * Is Space-Time a Quantum System ? (meaning that our 3-D universe is an emergent

      phenomenon).

      My answer is; Yes. Why, you can see in formula (17) of my essay.

      Regards,

      Branko

        Wilhelmus,

        Yes, I see. That's great. So really it's all in a holistic 'higher strata' of possibilities, which also links vertically to and includes the most simple physical mechanisms there are, in this case a spinning ball.

        I think you'll see, possibly almost uniquely given your training, a version of that holistic view in the 3D 'interleaved' structure of thought I refer to, as a way of managing and assessing the vast number of possibilities which may emerge in designing buildings of the slightest complexity.

        But a test of my hypothesis on the brain; After each chapter think back and see if you can remember more than 3 of the points, and let me know.

        A top score is coming, but my first one was 10 taking it to the top, which attracted two immediate anonymous 1's from trolls! so I'd delay yours for the moment.

        Very Best

        Peter

        Dear Wilhelmus,

        I am happy to welcome you in FQXi contest again with your nice essay. It is right that we have talking about of some different subjects in our works, however I did not seen the contradictions in ours approaches - I hope my work can be interesting to you.

        Best wishes!

          Dear de WILDE,

          Good essay on new concepts TS, TC, ENM etc. And very nice development of these ideas were done in the essay, my congratulations.

          Your words.... "It is widely accepted that 13,8 billion years ago somehow /somewhere the universe as we are (partly) aware of underwent a change that led to a conclusion that there is a "beginning". To arrive at a for the present scientific ideas an acceptable beginning of of nowhere, ideas like singularity and inflation were introduced."

          ................. You are introducing these concepts "Beginning and Singularity" based on Expanding Universe Models. These concepts are inevitable there. These concepts are based observation of redshifted Galaxies, which are 40 percent in the universe. They ignored rest 60 percent.

          Have a look at my essay also where these singularity and Bigbang were avoided by showing relevant reference papers ...

          Best wishes................

          =snp. gupta

            Dear Wilhelmus

            It was interesting to read your essay and indid I agree that the Emerging Reality is in the continuous present. Also that we are all subjective with our actions and perception. Yet we are a Union of Subjective life forms and as such its existence is Unique in Union and Multiplicity.

            I develop through my observation an approach that explain the occurrence of the self organization while it is continuously changing. (here in the FQXi contest - we are together,therefore I am)

            THank again

            yehuda atai

              Dear Peter,

              "managing the vast number of possibilities" is just another way of explaining "free will". It can also be called "creativity". Creating an emergent phenomenon in the NOW that is also radiating on the SSS (Subjective Simultaneity Sphere's) of other observers. However this "creation" is just a another life-line available in TS.

              Sorry for the two scores of "1" , I am aware that it will maybe arrive to me as well, but it is inherent to the system of valuation of this contest.I am not in favor of contestants giving scores toother contestents.

              best regards

              Wilhelmus

              Thanks Steve,

              The last time I was informed of your situation, your mother had problems, is it going better now ?

              best reards

              Wilhelmus

              Dear Brenco,

              I argue that an emergent reality is not gradual in its essense. It is just like an idea not divisible in quanta. The problem with quanta is that inbetween these "units" there is a "space". Our emerging phenomenon that is called space-time is an idea not a structured entity.

              We can "think" about this idea like being structured in quanta but this is only "thinking" about reality, and as so creating another probability in TS. Each probbility that is thought of by observers is a reality so....

              best regards

              Wilhelmus

              Dear George

              My perception cannot agree with any contadiction of thinking. Any thinking will reveal a "reality".

              I am gonna read your essy and will come bck to it on your thread.

              best regards

              Wilhelmus

              Dear Satyavarapu,

              The results of scientific research seem (until yesterday) to indicate that our universe has abeginning. Indeed our universe has (regarding human consciesness) 7,5 billion beginnings, every one believing in a Big Bang is creating a BIg Bang as beginning for his reality. I do not "believe " in a BB, nor in an expanding universe. The reality I live in is just an excitation that appears for my parception as a flowing time/life -line untill NOW. The "nowhere" is the totality of probabilities in TS that we cannot reach from where every conscious thinking emerges, each one creating its own beginning.

              I will go and read your essay.

              best regards

              Wilhelmus