Thank you very much dear Sridattadev.

I am going to inhale your essay right now

Wilhelmus

Dear Mr. Wilhelmus de Wilde,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate."

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

I did not rate your essay. I do not expect you to rate my essay. I am not bargaining with you. I am educating you.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Okay then it was acoincidence that just after your post another 1 came on.

But...Your realism is not mine as you will know when you read my essay...

I respect every perception of others but also expect that from them, each "education" as you are putting it is not only a way of sharing knowledge, but it is also away of trying to change the conclusions of the apprentrice. I am aware that you never will be able to know the totality, so yes I am learning every day with an open mind. I hope that your interpretation of what you call "realism" is also open for transformations in order to en large your knowledge. So perhaps in a few years you may think that the title "realist" is not covering the contents of your philosphy.

regards

Wilhelmus

Your paper definitely gives food for thought. In particular, trying to explain entanglement in a different way is nice because it is something that has always bewildered me how entanglement can truly be possible.

I agree that there are so many different paths and choices that we all take, and collectively, this could result in an infinite number of possibilities. But I sure hope that this doesn't mean that there are parallel universes where our decisions spawn a parallel path. It's hard to prove or disprove a parallel universe, but I personally believe that they don't exist. I believe that nature is simple and I sure hope that we can prove this one day.

    Dear Jeff,

    I also think that paralel universes don't EXIST is our own reality, and as we cannot (yet) jump from one reality to another by trespassing the Planck Wall, the paralel and other realities are only probabilities outside our own. It is like I mentioned in the essay : the dimension behind the Planck Wall doesn't exist in our emergent phenomenon. Other emergent phenomenae are only thoughts.

    best regards

    Wilhelmus

    Dear Wilhelmus

    I am struggling with some of your concepts such as ENM, but agree very much with the e Subjective Simultaneity Sphere. This was in effect pointed out by Helmholz a long while ago.

    For me "now" is not eternal but is continually changing.

    Regards

    George Ellis

      Dear George,

      Thank you for your answer on my essay and the reference to von Helmholz.

      NOW is never eternal in our emerging reality, we experience a FLOW of time.

      This 'flow" is the result of the capacity of our memory. The continuation of this flow is created by the addition of a new NOW moment. This new NOW moment is originating from Total Simultaneity where it is a timeless entity (so eternal) and I called it the ENM. The ENM is NOT existing in our emergent phenomenon called REALITY.

      Our experience (like you are saying is continually changing) of NOW is entangled with its "ENM" in TS but NOT existing in our experience of reality. The timeless ENM becomes an addition to a timeless experience in our memory.

      I hope to have explained my interpretation.

      best regards

      Wilhelmus

      Wilhelmus,

      First, a minor criticism. You use a lot of acronyms that are of your creation. Until something is widely accepted as an acronym, it is better not to do this. It makes it difficult for the reader.

      The real meat of your essay starts when you discuss the two slit experiment. That is a nice touch and fits well with the flow of things. I was not aware of the delayed choice experiment by Wheeler ... many thanks. The interpretation of the Wheeler experiment and the discussion of Bob and Alice then follows cleanly. The diagrams you provide here are helpful.

      It seems to me that what you describe as TS Consciousness is similar to the complex plane in my essay.

      All in all this is a respectable effort.

      Best Regards and Good Luck,

      Gary Simpson

        Thank you Gary for your instructive comments on my essay.

        Next time I will try to avoid acronyms (perhaps I like to mimic formula's...)...

        Indeed there is more to explain but I could not realise it in nine pages. I have solutions for time-travel, black hole information loss and more that you can find in my article published in The Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research Total Consciousness in Total Simultaneity

        Your "Complex Plane" is indeed almost the same idea as Total Simultaneity, maybe I need your advise to mathematically explain my idea of Total Simulaneity which is both a not in our reality existing singularity without time and space as well as it contains ALL Eternal NOW Moments and contents also a "field" named Total Consciousness.

        best regards

        Wilhelmus

        Dear Wilhelmus, I see that you have essentially different world's picture.

        ``Totality of human thinking"? Probably some analogue of the direct sum. I see that even in the physical community such ``totality" is very and very problematic. But at least one point is common: Hilbert space looks now more fundamental than space-time.

        PS I cannot understand the general principle of the calculation of scores. How this value may be reduced in time? Who play with this?

        Best regards,

        Peter

          Wilhelmus,

          I might be able to provide assistance but there is no guarantee. Take a look at two papers I have posted to viXra.org. They are "Quaternion Dynamics Part 1 and Part 2". They can be found here:

          http://vixra.org/author/gary_d_simpson

          My email address is shown on the cover sheet of my essays.

          Best Regards and Good Luck,

          Gary Simpson

          Dear Peter,

          Different colours make a beautifull rainbow....

          I mentioned the ratings because I began wit a 6 and a 9 nd then from nothing three 1's appeared , so I had to struggle from downwards on...

          It seems to happen more, as I was warned by another author.

          I just don't know who is playing this game of ones...

          best regards

          Wilhelmus

          Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

          I read your essay several times before I received your letter. Very interesting work, it makes us think a lot. At the time, I explored some of the problems that you have set.

          How do you say "Mankind is full of ideas" and "universe cannot yet be realised with our scientific method of thinking". The Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS). The origin of all "thoughts" is the reception of information. As I understand you, we are talking about the "noosphere - is the sphere of human thought". I have researched this problem Singular technology - the research area promoting the country's sustainable noosphere development Such factors as the formation of a new (noospheric) political and economic outlook and the changes in scientific and technological structure of economy are gaining paramount importance under the action of the law of time and the adequate need to change the logic of socio-economic behavior of the population of planet Earth.

          I researched "The unity between micro and macro". [/link] and Femtotechnologies

          Femtotechnologies Presentation . In work the femtoregion of the simplyest element, atom of hydrogen, is considered. It is shown that the electron in atom of hydrogen has the difficult spatial structure taking which into account allows to specify fundamental constants, such as a constant of thin structure, the speed of light, Bohr radius of an electron. It is shown that on the basis of these constants it is possible to construct the fundamental scales scaling both internal and external fields of atoms. It allows to formulate macroquantum laws that govern the Universe. It means that without research atoms femtoregion it is impossible to eliminate an abyss which arose between gravitation and electromagnetism. It is shown that our model removes a number of theoretical contradictions and is perfectly confirmed by the last astrophysical experiments.

          I also researched the opportunity of transfer functions of the human cerebral cortex in silicon neurochip Digital mind - one of the ways to immortality

          Nanoclusters_as_superatoms_and_supermolecules

          I hope that I was able to some extent «Come closer to the TOTAL YOU»

          Best regards

          Wilhelmus,

          I see your prediction was correct and the integers appeared. Not universal or 'observer dependent' it seems!. But yours is now applied.

          'Spin' in QM is only precluded from being rotation due to incorrect initial assumptions, as Bell suspected, which was 'making NO assumption' about particle morphology!. If they'd just hypothesised the most basic of particle morphologies, a spinning sphere, and Maxwell's 'curl' and linear momentum, none of the nonsense would ever have started!

          But yes; I suggested 10 years to advance understanding, but perhaps another 100 may be needed.

          Best

          Peter

          Hi Wilhelmus,

          Good to be in another contest with you. I like your TS concept. Would I be correct to say that is close in meaning to the concept of now?

          And thanks for your insights on my essay!

          Don Limuti

            Wilhelmus, this is a very well thought through essay. You give a clear picture of how information is stored in memory and is processes from signals from the spheres. This leads to goals. It is consistent with my view and you add a lot of detail and further insights.

            Our sensation of time is central to these ideas. The delayed choice experiment shows that causality is a complex matter. What are your thoughts on how our world is asymmetric with respect to the direction of time, so that past and future are so different?