THE PURPOSE OF LIFE by Wilhelmus de de WILDE

Wilhelmus,

I might be able to provide assistance but there is no guarantee. Take a look at two papers I have posted to viXra.org. They are "Quaternion Dynamics Part 1 and Part 2". They can be found here:

http://vixra.org/author/gary_d_simpson

My email address is shown on the cover sheet of my essays.

Best Regards and Good Luck,

Gary Simpson

Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

I read your essay several times before I received your letter. Very interesting work, it makes us think a lot. At the time, I explored some of the problems that you have set.

How do you say "Mankind is full of ideas" and "universe cannot yet be realised with our scientific method of thinking". The Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS). The origin of all "thoughts" is the reception of information. As I understand you, we are talking about the "noosphere - is the sphere of human thought". I have researched this problem Singular technology - the research area promoting the country's sustainable noosphere development Such factors as the formation of a new (noospheric) political and economic outlook and the changes in scientific and technological structure of economy are gaining paramount importance under the action of the law of time and the adequate need to change the logic of socio-economic behavior of the population of planet Earth.

I researched "The unity between micro and macro". [/link] and Femtotechnologies

Femtotechnologies Presentation . In work the femtoregion of the simplyest element, atom of hydrogen, is considered. It is shown that the electron in atom of hydrogen has the difficult spatial structure taking which into account allows to specify fundamental constants, such as a constant of thin structure, the speed of light, Bohr radius of an electron. It is shown that on the basis of these constants it is possible to construct the fundamental scales scaling both internal and external fields of atoms. It allows to formulate macroquantum laws that govern the Universe. It means that without research atoms femtoregion it is impossible to eliminate an abyss which arose between gravitation and electromagnetism. It is shown that our model removes a number of theoretical contradictions and is perfectly confirmed by the last astrophysical experiments.

I also researched the opportunity of transfer functions of the human cerebral cortex in silicon neurochip Digital mind - one of the ways to immortality

Nanoclusters_as_superatoms_and_supermolecules

I hope that I was able to some extent «Come closer to the TOTAL YOU»

Best regards

Wilhelmus,

I see your prediction was correct and the integers appeared. Not universal or 'observer dependent' it seems!. But yours is now applied.

'Spin' in QM is only precluded from being rotation due to incorrect initial assumptions, as Bell suspected, which was 'making NO assumption' about particle morphology!. If they'd just hypothesised the most basic of particle morphologies, a spinning sphere, and Maxwell's 'curl' and linear momentum, none of the nonsense would ever have started!

But yes; I suggested 10 years to advance understanding, but perhaps another 100 may be needed.

Best

Peter

Hi Wilhelmus,

Good to be in another contest with you. I like your TS concept. Would I be correct to say that is close in meaning to the concept of now?

And thanks for your insights on my essay!

Don Limuti

Wilhelmus, this is a very well thought through essay. You give a clear picture of how information is stored in memory and is processes from signals from the spheres. This leads to goals. It is consistent with my view and you add a lot of detail and further insights.

Our sensation of time is central to these ideas. The delayed choice experiment shows that causality is a complex matter. What are your thoughts on how our world is asymmetric with respect to the direction of time, so that past and future are so different?

Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

It's been obvious for years that you are extremely focused on consciousness, so I'm not surprised that you partook of 'expanded' consciousness, 'back in the day'.

I very much liked your "searching for the announcer in the radio".

When I first read your essay I started to give you 10, but everyone that I pushed to the top so they would receive more visibility immediately got shot down by whatever troll lurks beneath the FQXi bridge biting passersby with 1's.

Also, I wanted more time to digest the meaning of your essay. While I think your scheme is magnificent, I was unsure how literally you meant it. For me experience of physical reality is key, but current projections of structure on physical reality are confused at best. Essays on consciousness seek to gain 'respectability' (the coin of the realm) by tying their systems to physics (the holy word of the realm). If the physics is mistaken (as much today is) it can take a perfectly good understanding of metaphysics in the wrong direction.

For specific analysis of physics aspects in contention, see my reply to your comments on my essay page.

I do believe in a physically real universe, but GR and QM have confused the issue via erroneous projections that are (at the moment) given credence. The universe will not simply vanish when these errors are corrected, but certain mystical and unphysical conceptions will vanish.

In short, I think you've developed a powerful way of describing the experience of local conscious beings in a unified reality existing Now. I think you should not try to tie it too closely to mystical elements of current physics which will not survive the century. Hopefully, not the next decade. As metaphor I buy your beautiful system, as physics not so much. Clearly, over the sequence of FQXi essays, you are getting closer to the truth. I am quite sure that you will continue to do so. I hope my comments are useful to you.

My very best regards; keep up the excellent work.

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Dear Wilhelmus,

This was a very interesting reading, which turns upside-down some of the usual ideas. Causality as we thought we know it is challenged whenever we try to make sense of quantum mechanics by using elements of reality, and you used this well in trying to elucidate if there is a purpose of the universe.

Best regards,

Cristi

Wilhelmus,

This is language that helps us to touch the unfathomable, the inscrutable -- which are elements of our topic. For example, The choice is representing different available time-lines in TS. Total Simultaneity is acting like a wormhole connecting choices and time-lines. Or Total Simultaneity where all elemental interaction are done, happening or existing at the same time. Whatever is eternal must be out of time.

The meaning of life and the universe needs ways to bridge time and infinity. Your piece helps to bring a little more clarity to these ruminations.

Jim Hoover

Dear Wilhelmus,

Thanks for clarifying your 'collapse' argument. You are correct, we agree more now than I thought. Yes we do attack the same problem. It is so vast that there is room for two approaches. We focus on Now.

Also, I said believe you misunderstood a comment on scoring in my response on my essay page. You might wish to reread it.

Best regards,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Dear Wilhelmus,

I have to admit that I do not understand your text well. Do you mean that TC is the ultimate source of everything? If not, what could be this source? Is there any meaning of everything or it is rather a meaningless dream of the TC? How important are our ethical, aesthetic, scientific and philosophical efforts and why? What gives you any confidence in the worldview you share with your readers? Sorry for that many questions; you may consider them as nothing but reflection of my confusion with your essay.

Best,

Alexey Burov.

Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

i am starting now to read your essay, it may take some time but i will comment on it when i am finished!

Dear Wilhelmus de Wilde,

your lines of reasoning remind me of the many near-death experiencers which had been interviewed and can be watched on youtube. They report some similar things. Especially there are cases where the experiencer could take a view into his future (and the things indeed developed due to what he/she saw - but not in the sense of a self-fullfilling prophecy).

Some say that there are these life-lines of me and you, attached with different probabilities. But i would be cautious, because the paranormal can sometimes trick an experiencer with some information that does confirm what he/she does blieve anyways. I would not built a worldview out of what these things, but i restrict myself to only take the phenomenon as existing and the OBE's, the confirmations of what has been seen during the latter and the Healings also, as i annotated in my essay. Because it also could well be that the fact that in a near-death experience one can receive a look into ones own future, this is not due to a lawful metaphysical (mechanical) structure in these realms, but due to the sheer power of the entity which reins there (and knows all our subconsicousness) and which has created our world in the first place.

I would not necessarily connect free will and the measurement process and consciousness as proving that if a quantum event is observed by a human, it does alter its behaviour. Remember that decoherence does explain this phenomenon also, without reference to human observers. Nonetheless i agree that due to free will, the observer can facilitate his/her own life - well, theoretically, but practically there are many things in life that aren't under our control, so i would not attribute a special role to a human observer when it comes to observe some quantum events. This would only lead to self-inflation as it seems obvious to me in esoteric circles, the latter believing that we can create everything we want (due to mere tought-control and such things!).

I agree with you that the ranking of past and future can well be considered as not being rigid in the traditional order, there are possibilities (like i mentioned above) that this time structure isn't fundamental.

Regarding the multiverse approach, i think that it could be that all possibilities are somewhat there in an abstract realm, independently of noticing them or not. But i would not necessarily conclude from this that this is a kind of natural law, but would firstly conclude that it also could well be a strategy for God to trace the possiblities what i will do next with my free will (if he does not know this for sure in advance) and transfer me to a better life-line if i would pray for that (he surely wouln't necessarily transfer me to the life-line *i* would prefer at the moment, but to the one God has identified to be the most likely for me to make it back to him without taking me my free will).

Your essay is highly philosophical and metaphysical. Although the importance of consciousness in the whole scheme of things seems to be guaranteed for me (due to my considerations in my essay and my comments during the current essay contest), it is not entirely clear to me how knowledge about different timelines can solve the puzzles the current essay contest is concerned with. your considerations make some sense, they are - as far as i can see - consistent, but i miss some arguments which could underpin that your assumptions are a logical, means necessary consequence of something other, already known scientific or logical fact. Anyways, you made your case for a reality which is more than a deterministical and reductionistic machinery. Nonetheless, by searching for the meaning of life and all the rest, one has also to consider moral, ethical questions and also the problem of theodizee, the problem of evil - and if one believes in God as a personal intelligent entity, what this entity wants/wishes from us humans - and for us humans. And last but not least, how it is that we do live in a realm separated from this entity. I think if one does ponder about other dimensions and consciousness without such considerations, one has left out some important questions about fundamental reality. But because you have taken at least into account that the mentioned life-time-like dimensions could exist as possibilities, i give you a better rating than i would have done without. Because this could be a possible mechanism to explain the delayed choice experiments (and the other quantum weirdness).

Best wishes,

Stefan Weckbach

Dear Wilhelmus,

Thank you for your attention to my questions; your answers are really helpful. Following your invitation, I will ask you a bit more in order of better understanding.

You write: "These "availabilities" (available life/time lines) are forming you could say the "ALL". This ALL cannot be a complete set when any of the life-line availabilities are missing. So the specific life-line reality that you are experiencing NOW is essential for the completeness of ALL." I think an important point is the meaning of these "ALL", its completeness. Does it mean that all thinkable worlds/availabilities are realized, even really bad? Or, may be, following Leibniz, your ALL include only the best of all possible worlds?

Your essay is very different from others, and I highly appreciate this difference.

Best,

Alexey.