Dear Giovanni

Thank you very much for your favorable words and valuable remarks. These are good support to me, a morally only, but it is also the support. I see mainly we are like-minded people, and let me just tell some small remarks only:

1. You says //the nature of fundamental particles (and QR) has not yet been clarified// - but you already know one crazy guy who says "I know this" and he points on the large works and on the concretely results (see Refs)

2. Then you says //I am not a mathematician and nor the physicist ...etc.//

My dear, the philosophy was a father of all sciences, then the philosophers must have more priority to instruct and evaluate of mathematicians and physicists (as their non-thankful sons!) than the opposite!

However, I think everything is in the usual rule of things!

Be well and many successes to you!

    Be well and all the best to you too, dear George!

    I'll look at your other papers.

    (However: no "lesson" from me. That is not the way I do)

    All my best whishes again,

    Giovanni

    7 days later

    Giovanni,

    I found that a very accomplished essay with a well developed and argued thesis. I also largely agree, but a few questions below, and you avoid the problems of logic. I suspect you'd like the 'Law of the Reducing Middle' I proposed in an earlier essay to replace the problematic 'excluded' middle. The 'reducing middle' is a Bayesian, 'Bell' or quantum mechanical curve. It suggests NO two things in the universe are identical, so 1=1 is never quite true! I think that was 'It from Bit'; 'The Intelligent Bit' 2014, but I think you'd also like last years (scored top).

    This year my essay shows how QM's orthogonal Cos2 curves CAN be produced by classical interactions! (Of course few scientist even dare look!). The model is simply founded on extension of Pythogorus theorem to 3D dynamics.

    Do we not need a certain degree of discretion in continuity? i.e. must the rotation defining a spherical 'body' not be considered as discrete from any other bodies rotation?

    Do you think that without such discrete 'motions' anything could 'exist' at all?

    Fundamentally we argue the same of mathematics limitations, but you invoke a new, interesting and well justified rationale. All in all an exceptional essay worth an exceptional score, which I hope help gets you into the finalists. I do hope you get to read min before the deadline and comment. There are other slightly more philosophical elements.

    Very best of luck in the contest.

    Peter

      Dear Peter,

      I was very pleased to receive your comments with beautiful words of praise about my essay! I also began to read yours, which seems dense, thoughtful and original (I also intend, as soon as possible, to read that of 2015, so high rated and commented), but I don't know if I'll be able to comment on it properly before the deadline, considering I lack an adequate background in Quantum physics and have little free time, by now. For this I apologize.

      Thank you for your encouragement and good wishes, although I don't think I have real chances to get into the finalists rose. I am not a physicist and my rate in the contest is not high, despite your considerable contribution, for which I am very grateful to you.

      All the best regards,

      Giovanni

      Write a Reply...