Essay Abstract

A look at the universe through the lens of Fluid Dynamics. Pursues the problems of Gravity, Missing Mass, Black Holes and Dark Energy.

Author Bio

Mechanical Engineering career. Licensed Ship's Engineer. Inventor of the Hydroglider ( a form of which is widely used by Oceanographers) The Author of published treatises - The Dynamic Ether, Plane Golf and Marine Energy

Download Essay PDF File

Yes Mr. Ewan Sutherland Fallon

Gravity does not seem to be a characteristic of matter; matter seems to be a characteristic of "gravity".

In my essay, formula (17) can be found confirmation of your attitude.

Although, you uncritically accept erroneous theories of others (Big Bang). Observations related to your profession have been much more acceptable. This is enough to think that your work is good.

Best regards,

Branko Zivlak

Ewan,

I feel you, as the current expression goes. I agree that a field theory solves the matter problem, though the spacetime field eliminates the need of an ether. I understand the desire to have two interactive fields, though spacetime is sufficient as my essay argues.

Hope to discuss more. When my voting code is assigned, I also hope to help counteract the effect of moronic "peers".

    Dear Ewan Sutherland Fallon,

    Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

    I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

    Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

    The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

    A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    Thomas, thanks for your interest. It's my understanding that space/time came about when Michelson/Morley were unable to find an ether during their iconic experiment. The returning halves of the split beam projected at right angle to each other reflected back at the identical time. However it was assumed that the experiment was carried out in an open system, and that not only was there no ether, but that evidently time itself had to vary for the beam segments to arrive back simultaneously. In the Dynamic Ether conjecture the Earth is moving in a closed system of converging energy flows from all points of the compass, Thusly the projected 1/2 beams no matter in which direction projected, would always return simultaneously. Although any such experiment could not prove or disprove an ether, it does show that time taken would always be the same. In other words, time is a constant measure of events, - should the conjecture prove to be true. I realize the effect of this on modern Einstein-in theory, but that is where the logic would take us in this particular case.

    Nice essay Fallon,

    Your ideas and thinking are excellent. There are many Universe models which require Aether in some form. But this Aether was not found till now. What is your opinion...?

    For your information Dynamic Universe model does not require Aether, it is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

    Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

    With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

    Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

    Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

    http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

    Best wishes to your essay.

    For your blessings please................

    =snp. gupta

    Уважаемый Ewan Sutherland Fallon, РІС‹ смелый человек, РєРѕРіРґР° вспомнили РїСЂРѕ отвергнутый современной физикой эфир. Р' вашем СЌСЃСЃРµ РјРЅРµ нравится РІРѕС‚ это: Presumably the process would be universal, which could lead one to believe that maybe the atom has a minuscule black hole at its core and follows the balancing act with its electrons and protons reacting to the prime mover. Р--Р° эту мысль СЏ поставлю тебе самую высокую оценку.

    РњРѕР№ РґСЂСѓРі Леонид Ложкин, используя данные Рѕ плотности материи РІРѕ Р'селенной Рё РµС' размеров, рассчитал, что РјС‹ живС'Рј РІ «чС'СЂРЅРѕР№ дыре». РЇ его мысли РѕР± этом исправил Рё сказал, что эта «чС'рная дыра» раздроблена Рё кусочки РЅР°С...одятся РІ центре атомов, планет, Р·РІС'Р·Рґ Рё галактик. Поэтому РјС‹ такие активные, что РІСЃС' РІ нас балансирует между дырами.

    РЇ РЅРµ использую понятие динамического эфира, так как заменил его согласно утверждению Р"екарта РѕР± идентичности пространства Рё материи понятием двигающегося пространства-материи.

    РЈ New Cartesian Physic большой потенциал РІ понимании РјРёСЂР°. Чтобы показать этот потенциал, СЏ РІ СЃРІРѕС'Рј СЌСЃСЃРµ дал путь материалистического объяснения паранормального Рё сверС...естественного. Р'озможно, СЏ ошибся, РєРѕРіРґР° связал New Cartesian physiks СЃ паранормальным Рё сверС...естественным, поскольку это РЅРµ привлекает внимание РґСЂСѓРіРёС.... Посетите РјРѕС' СЌСЃСЃРµ, Рё РІС‹ найдС'те РІ РЅС'Рј РєРѕРµ-что РїСЂРѕ New Cartesian Physic. Надеюсь, что РІС‹ высоко оцените РјРѕС' СЌСЃСЃРµ.

    С уважением, Boris Dizhechko. (Учтите, что я пользуюсь электронным переводчиком)

    6 days later

    The dynamic ether concept well supports the Paul Dirac theories of particles appearing and disappearing momentarily. In this case the energy disturbance failed to achieve a balanced form, and reverted to its potential form.

    The conjectured energy stream into a star, could logically displace an otherwise passing beam of light from a hidden body in that it became visible. It has to be noted that this would replace the observable effect attributed to Einstein's body-curving space.

    Ocean tides may be formed as the passing Moon/Earth energy shadow causes a swelling of the thinnest part of the Earth shell (deep ocean bottom)towards the shadow. The moving resultant bulge of water dissipates land wise, in the form of tides. As the shadow passes the bulge becomes a depression withdrawing water from the shores. The foregoing provides a driving force instead of a "pull" of gravity to generate tides.

      Dear Ewan Sutherland Fallon,

      I agree with you,

      I think that the aether came from ancient Creek was proposed by the greatest philosophers. We should remember they established the foundation of now day's science. I cannot think that the greatest philosophers said completely wrong.

      I think that at the foundation of the natural structure (Foundations of Hierarchy), there might not be any energy dissipation, while being perfect.

      Your essay is something very interesting for me.

      Because your idea is somewhat similar with my idea in my essay in the Essay contest.

      I invite you to read my essay "A SPACE-TIME AS A PERFECT FLUID SINK FLOW" at the site of essay contest of FQXi, when you have a free time.

      at http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2826

      If you send an email to me, we would have a discuss more about the aether dynamics.

      Ch.Bayarsaikhan

        7 days later

        • [deleted]

        • Post #10

        Dear Ewan, we are talking about the same and should support each other.

        The dynamic space-matter concept well supports the Paul Dirac theories of particles appearing and disappearing momentarily. In this case the energy transforming space no failed to achieve a balanced form, and reverted to its potential form.

        The conjectured space-matter stream into a star, could logically displace an otherwise passing beam of light from a hidden body in that it became visible. It has to be noted that this would replace the observable effect attributed to Einstein's body-curving space.

        Ocean tides may be formed as the passing Moon/Earth energy moving space-matter, which creates shadow causes a swelling of the thinnest part of the Earth shell (deep ocean bottom)towards the shadow. The moving resultant bulge of water dissipates land wise, in the form of tides. As the shadow passes the bulge becomes a depression withdrawing water from the shores. The foregoing provides a driving force instead of a "pull" of gravity to generate tides.

        ð"ð×ð'ðáð× ðƒð×ð-ðÉðøð×ð'ðÉðóð¼ ð' NEW CARTESIAN PHYSIK!

        Dear Ewan,

        I will agree with your statement: Gravity does not seem to be a characteristic of matter; matter seems to be a characteristic of "gravity".

        Gravity mostly consists of dark energy and dark matter 96%. Therefore matter (ordinary matter) is only 4%. And it would not be false to consider the dark matter and energy as the source of matter (observable matter).

        Thanks for your essay. Come visit my blog and take a look at my essay.

        Don Limuti

          a month later
          Write a Reply...