Annie Jacobson's new book Phenomenon (advance copy sent to me by the author)
Sarfatti Commentary 1 of a series
Annie's book complements David Kaiser's "How the Hippies Saved Physics." It has lots of interesting details on Puharich's early work on psi for the military and of course a lot interesting history on Uri Geller, Russ Targ, Hal Puthoff, Kit Green, Dale Graf, Edgar Mitchell et-al. The end of the book points out that CIA, DOD et-al lack a scientific understanding of the psi phenomenon. Unfortunately, there is no mention of Dean Radin's important experiments nor of the post-quantum physics that explains it adequately in my opinion.
" ' A large body of reliable experimental evidence points to the inescapable conclusion that extrasensory perception does exist as a real phenomenon." the CIA concluded in 1975 ... 'There exists no satisfactory theoretical understanding of these phenomena ... ' Without a theory, the CIA was left with hypotheses, or conjecture." pp 377-78
Yes, that was the situation back then when CIA and Werner Erhard, Andrija Puharich and others contacted me to work on this problem. See my book Destiny Matrix and Kaiser's book "How the Hippies Saved Physics" for more details. It has taken a long time to solve this problem. I now claim, with Roderick Sutherland's serendipitous mathematical breakthrough
1. arXiv:1509.07380 [pdf]
Interpretation of the Klein-Gordon Probability Density
Roderick Sutherland
Comments: 6 pages
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
2. arXiv:1509.02442 [pdf]
Lagrangian Description for Particle Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics -- Entangled Many-Particle Case
Roderick Sutherland
Comments: 34 pages
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
3. arXiv:1509.00001 [pdf]
Energy-momentum tensor for a field and particle in interaction
Roderick Sutherland
Comments: 9 pages
Subjects: Classical Physics (physics.class-ph)
4. arXiv:1502.02058 [pdf]
Naive Quantum Gravity
Roderick I. Sutherland
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
5. arXiv:1411.3762 [pdf]
Lagrangian Formulation for Particle Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Single-Particle Case
Roderick I. Sutherland
Comments: 12 pages
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
6. arXiv:quant-ph/0601095 [pdf]
Causally Symmetric Bohm Model
Rod Sutherland
Comments: 35 pages, 5 figures, new sections 12 and 13 added
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
That what CIA, Werner Erhard et-al were looking for has finally now been essentially found - not only an explanation for anomalous ESP, but the explanation for ordinary consciousness and the beginning of a technology for conscious AI and the ability to upload human memories (qualia) to The Cloud in the sense of The Singularity of Kurzweil.
Precognition is an example of post-quantum locally retrocausal entanglement keyless signaling caused by action-reaction between Bohm's quantum information mental pilot waves and the classical level matter beables they interact with.
Dean Radin, today as the Destiny Matrix would have it, said this at the same time an advance copy of Annie's book arrived at my door
On Mar 22, 2017, at 5:47 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
Thanks Dean
Exactly my point! :-)
Do you understand Stan Klein's $70K experiment?
On Mar 22, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Dean Radin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:55 PM, JACK SARFATTI wrote:
[JS] Does Dean Radin agree that his work was not done properly?
Of course not. The relevant experiments have been conducted for decades, by dozens of independent researchers around the world, often under harsh scrutiny. With the current evidence in hand, consider that Jessica Utts, who was President of the American Statistical Association last year, said the following as part of her Presidential address to 6,000 professional statisticians from around the world:
For many years I have worked with researchers doing very careful work in [parapsychology], including a year that I spent full-time working on a classified project for the United States government to see if we could use these abilities for intelligence gathering during the cold war.
At the end of that project I wrote a report for Congress stating what I still think is true. The data in support of precognition and possibly other related phenomena is quite strong statistically and would be widely accepted if it pertained to something more mundane.
Yet, most scientists reject the possible reality of these abilities without ever looking at data. And on the other extreme, there are true believers who base their beliefs solely on anecdotes and personal experience. I have asked the debunkers if there is any amount of data that would convince them, and they generally responded by saying "probably not." I ask them what original research they have read, and they mostly admit that they haven't read any. Now there is a definition of a pseudoscientist: Basing conclusions on belief rather than data.
When I've given talks on this topic to audiences of statisticians I show lots of data. Then I ask the audience, which would be more convincing to you? Lots more data or one strong personal experience? And guess what, almost without fail the response is one strong personal experience.
... I think people are justifiably skeptical because most people think these abilities contradict what we know about science. They don't, but that's the topic of another talk.
I would add to what Jessica said that it's a mistake to think that yet another experiment, however impeccably it's designed and regardless of who publishes it, is going to convince anyone of anything they presently think is impossible.
Jack and others are offering theoretical models that view retrocausal effects not as unexplainable anomalies, but as phenomena that make sense. A viable theory is the only thing that will convince staunch skeptics. Even a money-making application won't work because hardcore skeptics can (and regularly do) explain away anything they don't like as flaws or fraud.
best wishes,
Dean
www.noetic.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Chief Scientist, Institute of Noetic Sciences deanradin.com
- Distinguished Professor, California Institute of Integral Studies ciis.edu
- Co-Editor-in-Chief, Explore, an Elsevier journal explorejournal.com