Essay Abstract

At first glans, this paper would be off-topic, but it would hopefully contribute to physical science as it suggests novel methods for measuring speed of light emitted from moving objects. Speed of light has been measured by various methods and to current knowledge is believed to be constant. These techniques include accurately known measurement methods of the day; e.g. cavity resonator, radio and laser interferometry etc. and are persistently revised. Despite the fact that there exists some controversy regarding the limit of speed of light, but there also methods like FEL (A free-electron laser or FEL, is a type of laser whose lasing medium consists of very-high-speed electrons moving freely through a magnetic structure). Proposed method is based on a conception of measuring the speed of light from a moving frame which according to the principal of special relativity would be a constant quantity in vacuum and is independent of the frame and its relative velocity whether the light is received or emitted. In spite of the theoretical part i.e. relativity and Doppler Effect and the fact that Michelson and Morley experiment doesn't measure the speed of light directly, this method suggests an applied measurement which needs to be tested. In addition another method based on fringe shift is suggested on a rotating Michelson-Morley platform. In fact the Sagnac effect has already shown a non-null result [1] as it is done on a rotational platform, but this method is somewhat different as one of the mirrors has a slower linear/angular velocity then the other one.

Author Bio

MSc.Engineering Physics, MBA, IT-Security, Innovator, Member of Swedish Physical Society

Download Essay PDF File

"At first glans (sic), this paper would be off-topic"

At a second, third and all further glances too, frankly.

    Dear Mr. Shandaei

    The speed of light is the limit. The limit we can measure approximately.

    It is best to stay exact value by convention.

    Best regards,

    Branko Zivlak

    Dear Mr. Zivlak,

    You are right its about approximation, but the point here is, another method of truly make the measurements from moving frames not involving L-symmetry and relativity.

    Kind Regards

    Koorosh

    Dear Vladimir,

    This is one of interesting subjects, and really researcher have been putting lot of effort for different type of measurements, I hope one day we can acquire much more information about light.

    Warm Regards

    Koorosh

    Hi Shahdaei,

    Nice suggestion on a new method of measurement of light.

    Your proposed experiment is good. You said... " An emitting source of light (emitting frame) which is the moving frame has a relative uniform velocity v with respect to the stationary frame. The measuring frame which comprising of measuring devices, is stationary relative to the emitting frame. Furthermore the light is assumed to propagate in vacuum."

    Slight doubts are there... According to your experiment, Earth is stationary and rocket is moving with uniform velocity. But in our Dynamic Universe, both are moving on curves. Relative motion will never be linear. Probably you will have to make slight correction for that effect.... Hope you will discuss...

    I request you to please have a look on my essay also....For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

    Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

    With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

    Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

    Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

    http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

    Best wishes to your essay.

    For your blessings please................

    =snp. gupta

      Dear Koorosh Shahdaei,

      Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

      I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

      Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

      The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

      A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

      Joe Fisher, Realist

        Dear Satyavarapu,

        Thanks for your comment, as a matter of fact as you mentioned about curvature, this regards all experiments that we do, as vi, our solarsystem and our galaxy all are rotating but we have approximate linearity that works good an small distances, I hope i could answer your questions. I'll proceed to your paper shortly.

        Kind regards

        Koorosh

        Dear Joe,

        Thank you for your comments, my view is although we observe a complex world, but I think underneath it is much more simple that we can't really comprehend as we only kan comprehend part of the real universe.

        Kind regards

        Koorosh

        Dear Koorosh,

        Your work to develop a compact meter of variations in the speed of light is an interesting and important work.

        I did not accidentally write about variations in the speed of light, because for the time being almost no one understands that during the measurement of the speed of light, the luminiferous medium moves with a very large variance of the speed of motion, due to the action of a set of gravitational waves in form of streams of gravitins. Some gravitational waves finish the action on the device, others start, and can act from different sides. Therefore strangely enough, but your device belongs to the class of an optical gravitational wave recorder, like LIGO and LISA projects, but it is much more compact and simpler.

        An important advantage of your device is its lack of inertia, it does not have inert mass, but registers both low frequency and high-frequency variations of the action of gravitational waves by measuring of the speed of movement of the luminiferous medium. I hope that the sensitivity of the device will be much higher than the inertial devices.

        Therefore, your work will allow to rethinking the mechanism of gravity, which determines the self-organization of matter and, thus, to get more accurate answers to the questions posed in the competition.

        Everyone expected the Earth to move in the laminar flow of the luminiferous medium, but in fact, on its act turbulent streams of gravitons in the gravitational waves. The light-bearing medium is a superfluid medium in which there are practically no laminar streams.

        Many tried to repeat the experiment of Michelson and Morley, somebody received a low speed of luminiferous medium, and someone did not get no speed , because the gravitational waves on the surface of the Earth operate mainly from 12 to 24 hours of solar time. Who and when measured speed - history is silent.

        My essay states that Michelson and Morley were to get the averaged velocity of the Earth in a light-bearing medium of 8 km/s and they received it . The speed of motion of the light-bearing medium relative to the Earth is transformed in the first cosmic velocity of the Earth, the square of which determines the gravitational potential of the Earth's surface.

        I.e., gravity has the dynamic cause; its mechanism is considered in my essay. By the simple detector of gravitational waves, I was able to also register the turbulence light medium register the turbulence light medium .

        I wish you creative success.

        Kind regards,

        Vladimir Fedorov

        Dear Koorosh,

        Sorry, the previous message does not work links. I expose the message a second time.

        Your work to develop a compact meter of variations in the speed of light is an interesting and important work.

        I did not accidentally write about variations in the speed of light, because for the time being almost no one understands that during the measurement of the speed of light, the luminiferous medium moves with a very large variance of the speed of motion, due to the action of a set of gravitational waves in form of streams of gravitins. Some gravitational waves finish the action on the device, others start, and can act from different sides. Therefore strangely enough, but your device belongs to the class of an optical gravitational wave recorder, like LIGO and LISA projects, but it is much more compact and simpler.

        An important advantage of your device is its lack of inertia, it does not have inert mass, but registers both low frequency and high-frequency variations of the action of gravitational waves by measuring of the speed of movement of the luminiferous medium. I hope that the sensitivity of the device will be much higher than the inertial devices.

        Therefore, your work will allow to rethinking the mechanism of gravity, which determines the self-organization of matter and, thus, to get more accurate answers to the questions posed in the competition.

        Everyone expected the Earth to move in the laminar flow of the luminiferous medium, but in fact, on its act turbulent streams of gravitons in the gravitational waves. The light-bearing medium is a superfluid medium in which there are practically no laminar streams.

        Many tried to repeat the experiment of Michelson and Morley, somebody received a low speed of luminiferous medium, and someone did not get no speed , because the gravitational waves on the surface of the Earth operate mainly from 12 to 24 hours of solar time. Who and when measured speed - history is silent.

        My essay states that Michelson and Morley were to get the averaged velocity of the Earth in a light-bearing medium of 8 km/s and they received it . The speed of motion of the light-bearing medium relative to the Earth is transformed in the first cosmic velocity of the Earth, the square of which determines the gravitational potential of the Earth's surface.

        I.e., gravity has the dynamic cause; its mechanism is considered in my essay. By the simple detector of gravitational waves, I was able to also register the turbulence light medium register the turbulence light medium .

        I wish you creative success.

        Kind regards,

        Vladimir Fedorov

          Dear Koorosh,

          On page 7 of my essay "Towards more reasonable evolution" I argued for the one-way definition of the speed of light in vacuum. I am ready to defend this view.

          My first posting, directed to all, was deleted, perhaps it was reported as inappropriate.

          Regards,

          Eckard Blumschein

            Dear Vladimir,

            Thank you for your comments, very interesting point of view, actually you looked at the device from another point of view, and this type of brain storming is very enlightening.

            I wish you success in your essay.

            Kind Regards

            Koorosh

            Dear Koorosh Shadaei

            I invite you and every physicist to read my work "TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I'm not a physicist.

            How people interested in "Time" could feel about related things to the subject.

            1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.

            2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.

            3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.

            4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as "Time" definition and experimental meaning confronts them?

            5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,... a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander.....

            6) ....worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn't a viable theory, but a proved fact.

            7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.

            8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.

            9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.

            11)Time "existence" is exclusive as a "measuring system", its physical existence can't be proved by science, as the "time system" is. Experimentally "time" is "movement", we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure "constant and uniform" movement and not "the so called Time".

            12)The original "time manuscript" has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.

            I share this brief with people interested in "time" and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.

            Héctor

            Koorosh

            Dear Koorosh

            You have described your proposal well. Question: having the emitter on a rocket moving at velocity v will introduce Doppler shifts in the wavelength. Why a moving emitter at all?

            In my theory of light moving through a discrete universal ether at a maximum speed c Beautiful Universe Theory n pure vacuume, but at slower speeds in gravitational or otherwise energized fields, c would be faster on the Space Station than c measured on Earth. Or would it ? Since clocks would give slower time? Needs thinking out by experts!

            Good luck

            Vladimir