Stochastic Time and Temporal Non-locality by Toru Ohira

Dear Dr. Nath

I will post further in a few days in your forum as I try to digest more

of your comments. Sincerely, Toru

Dear Dr. Ohira,

Very interesting idea of stochastic time, and transferring the stochasticity along the time axis. While I was reading, it passed through my head the idea you express in the discussion section: that this stochastic time may be applied to time-energy uncertainty relations. My guess is that you can also succeed in other problems you suggest in closure, namely transferring non-locality on the time axis, and finding equilibrium of nonlocality and stochasticity between space and time direction, in order to get Lorentz invariance. But with or without these developments, your results are interesting.

Best regards,

Cristi Stoica

"Flowing with a Frozen River",

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/322

Dear Dr. Stoica:

Thank you for your interest and encouragement.

I hope to develope further along the lines of

thought I presnted. I have downloaded your

essay as well. I like your thoughts about

the Quantum mesurement and initial conditions.

Sincerely, Toru

I do agree with your 'Time dislocation': obviously if Time has something to do with a speed or sound or temperature scale, it has nothing to do with Space or Matter itself.

The mistake of 'Time localization' comes from the very beginning of the 'Light Science' as I say in my own essay ('Square Wheels or Real Dynamics'), very beginning that it to say Newton, Huygens, Descartes, etc. From a metaphysical fuzzy idea of space, seen as much as 'something' or 'nothing' (or full/empty space).

(I think Asian or Indian culture is close at hand to this XVIIth Anglo-Saxon ideology called 'Empiricism' which is typically based on a mirror and music.)

But there is no dynamism in a function! Algebraic geometry is just theory. Factor Time is just a number. Supposed to be dynamic thermic scale was used by Walras in economy to make previsions with the success we can see these days.

Dear Dr. Le Rouge:

Thank you for your post and interests. I also

downloaded your work. I enjoy your titling of sections.

Sincerely, Toru

- I translated on my forum part of a very interesting letter of R. Descartes (1638) in which he explains that one must exclude Time and Speed in the question of Force (Energy). Why? Because if you keep Speed and Time, you have to solve Metaphysical problems that Descartes does not want to solve in an essay about Ballistic or Statics.

Make the comparison with Scientists on this forum (Carlo Rovelli) who are face to face (350 years after) with the same problem. They suggest to forget time like Descartes, but, the 'nonsense' is here : they keep the Time as a dimension!!!

- No doubt that Poincaré, Einstein and H. Bergson when they are introducing Time are fighting against Descartes empiricism and want to introduce first of all Metaphysics that is for them related to Time idea (Music gives you the feeling that Time existe out of your Mind.)

- I am not only making the link between science and art but between Politics too. Mirror (of Japanese Emperor) is grounding the Christian Culture of Descartes, Huygens and Newton. French King Louis XIV was a kind of Japanese Emperor too. Do you think it is just a coincidence if Statics principles are triumphating in Europe just when State Religion is triumphating in England and France?

Statics in Art, statics in Science and statics in Politics at the same Time!