Essay Abstract

Observing the basic mechanisms of life, it is aimed to extract the most basic quantities defined in terms of physics and mathematics and discuss their fundamental relation. It is argued that there must be self-consistency of information, implying a vast number of redundancies (laws of nature).

Author Bio

I worked as a professional theoretical physicist more than 3 decades ago, then changing to the administration. I am highly interested in fundamental questions of nature, despite of all the throwbacks experienced.

Download Essay PDF File

5 days later

Dear Gerald Vones,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Nice short essay Prof Vones,

Your ideas and thinking are very good like... "Entropy is a mess for physicists accustomed to clear symmetries. Onthe other hand, entropy is the most fundamental quantity of all, since it is nothing but information as such. Information seems to vary over time, but it is a pure number and thus lives in the timeless world of mathematics...."

Here I am also proposing a fundamental property of Universe. It is reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe. As you are interested in fundamental questions , I request you to please have a look on my essay with a different type of fundamental ideology...

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Best wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please................

=snp. gupta

Dear Gerald Vones

I invite you and every physicist to read my work "TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I'm not a physicist.

How people interested in "Time" could feel about related things to the subject.

1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.

2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.

3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.

4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as "Time" definition and experimental meaning confronts them?

5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,... a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander.....

6) ....worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn't a viable theory, but a proved fact.

7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.

8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.

9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.

11)Time "existence" is exclusive as a "measuring system", its physical existence can't be proved by science, as the "time system" is. Experimentally "time" is "movement", we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure "constant and uniform" movement and not "the so called Time".

12)The original "time manuscript" has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.

I share this brief with people interested in "time" and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.

Héctor

a month later

Gerald

Lovely essay. One bit stood out for me; "one aspect is in fact stunning: phenomena

like the violation of Bell's inequality - and its basic assumption..."

I hope you'll have a look at my essay on that.. with a stunning classical derivation identified compliant with Bell!

(There's even links to a video your dog would like - Schrodingers dog now gets the limelight!)

Very best

Peter

Dear Gerald Vones Graz,

I have read you essay and there is something interesting for me.

Particularly these phrase is nice for me

"Entropy is a mess for physicists accustomed to clear symmetries. On the other hand, entropy is the most fundamental quantity of all, since it is nothing but information as such.....

Knowing the number of bits of creation means knowing everything. This includes the way entropy seems to increase over time, what now is recognized as the transition from intuitive to camouflaged symmetries. Two clarifications may be helpful. First, creation spans over all of time, be it emerging, reborn or otherwise. Symmetries in time are the most basic, and handling these is what physicists get paid for...."

With Best Regards,

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

I enjoyed the story Gerald,

A nice discussion about the overlooked value of entropy in Physics and I quite agree. I have studied the relevance to Physics of the Mandelbrot Set, which is manifestly asymmetrical, for a number of years. There is a lot to enjoy for such a short essay. I agree the quantum background is complex varying or c-numbers, as you describe it. Not totally on topic, so only partial credit can be given, but a fun read. I enjoyed looking at your R0 Cosmology paper, assuming that was also you. I am sure you could have said much more, but enjoyed reading the opinions of others - hopefully mine among them. I had a dog once (or more than once actually), but that's another story.

Kind Regards,

Jonathan

Write a Reply...