Landau damping as a global quantum by Dariusz Krzywicki

I mostly understand this..

From a Physics standpoint, Landau damping is what makes a high energy plasma self-stabilizing, in some measure, because particle resonances will soak up some of what would otherwise be free energy. This creates islands of order in what would otherwise be a chaotic regime. So regions of the parameter space open up which can be exploited by life forms, and this is all very good. It would be hard to derive this awareness solely from reading your essay, however.

After hearing Steinhardt's lecture a few years back, and seeing the recent Scientific American article, I would not worry too much that eternal inflation presages the end of the universe. Conventional inflation is somewhat unrealistic. I am exploring octonionic inflation as an alternative, and it is promising. But the idea of a global quantum, I take more seriously. In decoherence theory, they refer to a global wavefunction, which is in some ways what you are talking about.

I only partly agree that the entire history of the universe can be treated as a consequence or subset of Landau damping. But it is interesting to examine how that creates orderly regimes.

Regards,

Jonathan

Dear Dariusz Krzywicki,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Dear Dariusz Krzywicki

I invite you and every physicist to read my work "TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I'm not a physicist.

How people interested in "Time" could feel about related things to the subject.

1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.

2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.

3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.

4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as "Time" definition and experimental meaning confronts them?

5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,... a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander.....

6) ....worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn't a viable theory, but a proved fact.

7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.

8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.

9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.

11)Time "existence" is exclusive as a "measuring system", its physical existence can't be proved by science, as the "time system" is. Experimentally "time" is "movement", we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure "constant and uniform" movement and not "the so called Time".

12)The original "time manuscript" has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.

I share this brief with people interested in "time" and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.

Héctor

Dear Krzywicki,

Nice essay on Landau damping, combining all major parts of Physics, It is very nice attempt to combine all history of the universe as a consequence or subset of Landau damping....

Probably you may need a little bit of correction, in your statement page 2 ... " The black swan after Planck 2013: Dark energy 68.3%, Dark matter 26.8%,Ordinary matter 4.9%", as the dark matter was not found experimentally....

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Best wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please................

=snp. gupta

Dear Dariusz Krzywicki,

I agree with you, so I appreciate your attempt that

Landau damping that expresses phenomenon prevents an instability from developing while having a common parameter.

This algebraic property can be used to discover the global quantum as common eigenvalues.

Also you mentioned Nielsen theory, therefore, I would like to ask about singular points in a superposition of two sink flow fields.

If you have a free time, would you read my essay while checking its mathematics?

which is at http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2826

With Best Regards,

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

I am now returning to read.

And I think you. I know a little, the work of Villani and more the work of Bohm, but your insights in the article and comments are are appreciated. I think G2 is important as well, in gauge fixing for the end of inflation or the transition in 5-d black hole --> white hole yielding 4-d spacetime. As you say; going back to what Dirac and Cartan knew is important still.

Regards,

Jonathan

Dariusz

I'm no mathematician but I am sympatico with the description of Landau damping. A new concept for me. Could this relate also to requantization of 'wavefunctions' and 'photons', which I find (after Zeilinger) have 'no memory of their previous state' after interactions.

I hope you may read my essay which leads to an important classical derivation of QM but without mathematics.

Very best

Peter

Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris