Essay Abstract

In this article, we argue that the Nature always have definite Goals that are not said to be achievable by Chance while Wandering. We claim that: Axioms not the Mathematical laws, gave raise to aims and intentions that went wrong. As per Standard Model with Standard Cosmology, we conclude that 'Wandering Towards a Goal' is not possible and it is only, 'Wandering for a Chance' is applicable. Thus, we have investigated this problem with 'Wandering Towards an Observer as Goal' in Standard Cosmology as well as in an Alternative cosmological paradigm; and inferred that there is nothing in the Universe, that Wander.

Author Bio

Medical graduate by profession. Developer for a Real-time Healthcare System. Doing research in alternative cosmology and has developed a paradigm of, 'Eigen-rotational Clusters of String-matter Universe (ECSU)', and applied some of the postulates in, 'Molecular Dynamics Synchronized Manipulator system to Repair Biomolecules', that is one of the sub-system of instrumentations integrated with the Real-time healthcare system that is on development. Work abstract at, http://www.johnsonsmedicom.org and the biography at (ORCID ID): http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-8231

Download Essay PDF File

Dear Jayakar,

I read with great interest your deep analytical essay, made in the spirit of the Cartesian doubt. You give very interesting ideas on the structure and the beginning of the universe, matter, space, time. These ideas are important for understanding the origins and causes of the crisis in basic science.

I have questions about your theory:

- What is the ontological status of the coordinates in your theory?

- Why "strings"? : «As per this paradigm, 'Matter' existed as multiple static open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began.»

Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

    Dear Vladimir

    1. As time emerges with the dynamics of 'matter', without the existence of 'matter' there is no origin of time. Thus 'matter' existed even before the origin of dynamics.

    2. Transformation of zero-dimensional objects into three-dimensional structures, is not possible; whereas one-dimensional strings on eigen-rotation, transform into three-dimensional branes.

    With best regards & Thanks

    Jayakar

    Dear Mr. Jayakar Johnson Joseph

    High quality essay, good illustrations. Great effort for nothing. You accept the Big Bang theory as fact. But it is a false theory. See why in my essay.

    Best regards,

    Branko

    Thank you dear Branko,

    Thank you for your appreciation.

    I never say Big Bang theory is absolute. Actually this work contradicts Corpuscularianism, and seems to be applicable in your work, 'The Theory of Unity between the Whole and its Parts', as this describes the Universe in Continuum mechanics with Eigen-rotational string-matters.

    I shall go through the detail of your work soon to analyse the integrations, as it sounds Holarchy.

    With best regards & wishes

    Jayakar

    Dear Jayakar,

    Universe is an i-Sphere and we humans are capable of interpreting it as 4 dimensional dual torus inside a 3-Sphere, which consists of Riemann 2-sphere as Soul as depicted in S=BM^2 diagram in the attached doc. Soul is the simplest of the complex manifolds with in the 3-sphere, Mind and Body constitute the remaining complexity. Soul, Mind and Body are in a toroidal flux in human beings, exactly at the center of the 3-sphere one can experience the unity of the trinity and that is the now moment we experience. As there are 4 dimensions required for a 3-sphere, the regular 3 dimensions of space and the fourth dimension of time, it is obvious that the 2-sphere (Riemann sphere) of consciousness with in us is with out the time dimension and hence the saying "eternal soul". Poincare` conjecture implies that consciousness is homeomorphic (same or similar) in all beings manifested in all dimensions of the universe, as i have shown that Riemann sphere can serve as the fundamental unit of consciousness.

    Love,

    i.Attachment #1: 6_zero__i__infinity.docx

      Thank you dear Sridattadev.

      I apologize that I'm not an expert in interpreting Science with Spiritually.

      Science has limitations, as Human knowledge has limitations in exploring the Nature.

      I think, Consciousness is the State of Awareness in Reality, in that, 'time' is integral of reality.

      In relevant to this I would like to refer the talk, The Reality of Consciousness, by Peter Russell.

      While we analyse Biological Consciousness with this paradigm, we may infer that it is the dominance in number of Propagating T-branes over the Oscillating T-branes, that are distributed in specific localities in a Biological System. This may be applicable to the existing Universe also, while we describe the Consciousness of existing Universe.

      Thus I revise my statement in my essay, "As per this paradigm, 'Matter' existed as multiple static open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began" under the subheading 'Origin of Universe or Origin of Dynamics of Universe?', as:

      "As per this paradigm, 'Matter' existed as multiple two dimensionally fluctuating ('static' to be removed) open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began"

      With best regards & thanks,

      Jayakar

      Dear Reader,

      In my essay there is an error in one of the statement, "As per this paradigm, 'Matter' existed as multiple static open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began" under the subheading 'Origin of Universe or Origin of Dynamics of Universe?'. Kindly read it, as:

      "As per this paradigm, 'Matter' existed as multiple two-dimensionally fluctuating (please replace 'static') open strings, before the dynamics of the Universe began"

      Regretting for the inconvenience.

      Jayakar

      4 days later

      Dear Dr. Jayakar Johnson Joseph,

      Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

      I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

      Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

      The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

      A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

      Joe Fisher, Realist

      Nice essay cosmological essay dear Jayakar J Joseph,

      Your ideas and thinking are good, for example, in the abstract itself you said.... " In this article, we argue that the Nature always have definite Goals that are not said to be achievable by Chance while Wandering. We claim that: Axioms not the Mathematical laws, gave raise to aims and intentions that went wrong. As per Standard Model with Standard Cosmology, we conclude that 'Wandering Towards a Goal' is not possible and it is only, 'Wandering for a Chance' is applicable.

      The questions that you raise are really significant:

      • Is matter existed prior to Big Bang and in analogue to the nature of Bose-Einstein condensate?

      • Is the beginning of time and the origin of time are same?

      • Is our interpretation on evolution of three dimensional structures from zero dimensional objects during the evolution of Universe is agreeable?

      • Is our perception on the Nature of matter as, 'discontinuous structures' defined from Brownian Motion, is real? "

      .................. Your questions are answered in a different way in Dynamic Universe Model, Which is another model for Universe. These mathematics shows that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal...just have a look at my essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....

      For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

      Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

      With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

      Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

      Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

      http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

      Best wishes to your essay.

      For your blessings please................

      =snp. gupta

        10 days later

        Dear Joe,

        Thank you for your interest in this article. I agree that mathematical simplicity is imperative for abstraction. In this paradigm, trigonometry is the tool for simplification following the quantisation of each change of eigen-rotational state with variable arc length of eigen-rotational path in a string segment, while T-branes and TBP-branes are the abstracts. As per this scenario we may claim that, infinite two dimension is foundational, while time emerges from eigen-rotation of infinite One-dimensional structure.

        With best regards & thanks,

        Jayakar

        Error in the attached illustration: Arrow in the Circle to be on the other direction.

        Dear Gupta,

        Thank you for your interest in this essay. As per this paradigm, age of Dynamic universe is infinite; while the origin of linear time emerges with the beginning of eigen-rotation of a string-matter in the Universe. Axiom of this paradigm is that the fundamental matter is string like structure rather than point like particle; while mass-energy equivalence corresponds to matter-energy equivalence, that is variable.

        With best regards & thanks,

        Jayakar

        14 days later

        Dear Sirs!

        Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

        New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

        New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

        Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

        Sincerely,

        Dizhechko Boris

        Dear Jayakar

        I read with interest your speculations about the Universe and how you examined three scenarios to determine cause and effect. In that sense you have adhered wonderfully to the question posed by the essay contest.

        I was not that interested in that question which I thought ill-posed, but here is my fqxi essay

        Best wishes,

        Vladimir

        Write a Reply...