Essay Abstract

n last year's contest I presented a simple mathematical system( structure) that reproduced many of the results of Quantum Mechanics, including QFT. This time I will show more connections to the standard physics including path integral and similar QFT techniques. Also, I will present the simulation for gravity where Newton's law is generated from the same system. In this essay I have no discussion regarding "goals and intentions" , that is because I believe these questions cannot be satisfactorily be answered unless we get to the bottom of the main question. That is, what exactly is reality.

Author Bio

Degrees: B.S. E.E. university of Wyoming 1979 MPHIL E.E. University of Sussex 1987

Download Essay PDF File

So, what you have here it is that mathematics itself have an impulse to create things. So, it is like we live in a reality based on abstract relations, with some sort of will to create. A kind of Platonic world, with will to manifest itself.

    Yes, Daniel, You can walk into a university library and go the mathematics section and browse all the books, you could already see how math produces almost unlimited plethora of structures, really no limit. so naturally, one such structure was bound to create our weird reality, although it amazes me( I really don't know how to put it in words) how such a simple but general structure lead to our reality that we can be aware of.

    Like I have said in my essays. We are forced to use use math to describe reality and how wonderfully does that. THAT WAS A BIG HINT, Wigner wrote his masterpiece

    "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences"

    Normal physics is clear on that. MY theory makes the idea even more clearer. I think it will not be long before I fully explain the present physics in the language of my theory which I believe IS the fundamental theory of reality. I have given a very good taste of that for those who are WILLING to listen.

    PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:

    YOU CAN CLICK ON THESE WORDS TO GO THE APPROPRIATE LINK (PDF did not give them colors)

    1. ABSTRACT

    In last year's contest I presented : click on contest

    2. Links to standard physics

    I showed the simulations that seemed :click on simulations

    3. Gravity

    previous simulation I was getting : click on simulation

    5 days later

    The difference between physics and mathematics is that matter of Physics has INERTIA. While numbers and formula have no inertia.

    Dear Dr. Adel Sadeq,

    Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

    I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

    Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

    The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

    A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    Nice essay Sadeq,

    Your ideas and thinking are excellent to avoid singularities, but have a look at your equation...

    e^2/r-(e^2/r)*EXP(-1*r/a)

    = e^2/r-(e^2/r)*e^(-1*r/a)

    =e^2/r-e^(2/r-1*r/a)

    = e^2/r-e^(2a-r)/ar)

    Will be infinity or undefined at r=0;

    Will be Undefined at r = infinity.....

    You can very easily avoid all these singularities if you use Dynamic Universe Model...

    ............... At this point I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ...............reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc...just have a look at my essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....

    I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

    For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

    Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

    With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

    Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

    Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

    http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

    Best wishes to your essay.

    For your blessings please................

    =snp. gupta

      Hi Gupta,

      This equation only holds for a < r otherwise you will get interaction or particle antiparticle as in standard relativistic theory since it means the distance is less than the Compton wavelength.

      I will read your essay.

      Thanks

      Adel

      5 days later

      Thanks for your comments on my essay page. The Yukawa equation is used to look at forces that fall off faster than the inverse square law. This is usually the nuclear interaction. These equations with appropriate choice of constants are involved with the masses of hadrons.

      Cheers LC

      Adel, good essay. Where do you have your work posted?

      Cheers!

      Klee

      9 days later

      Dear Adel,

      Interesting usage of the Helmann type potential and the connections you make in the essay to obtain Newton's gravity law. I hope this will lead you to something interesting, and I wish you good luck in the contest!

      Best regards,

      Cristi

      5 days later

      Adel,

      I'm not sure what to think here. The first thing I must do is ask a question. Do you carry units through your calculations? For example, you put in a length and then convert the result into a dimensionless value (Mp/Me). I'm not familiar with the Helmann potential or the Yukawa potential, but the Coloumb potential is in volts.

      I think what you are seeing may simply be that these potentials have a functional form that satisfies a certain type of differential equation. For example, in engineering it is possible to formulate fluid dynamic problems and heat transfer problems in such a way that they mimic electrical potential problems ... the form of the differential equations is the same. So, if you have a solution for one type then you can solve the other types as well.

      Best Regards and Good Luck,

      Gary Simpson

      Dear Sirs!

      Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

      New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

      New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

      Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

      Sincerely,

      Dizhechko Boris