Essay Abstract
In this essay we shall review the long-standing alliance with mathematics and physics. And later we shall review some ideas and proposals to help us get a sense of what might be the reason to this wonderful conjugation of mathematics and physics to work but although they are mere speculations that hope to help resolve this very well established fundamental question that has been bothering the best of the best for decades now.
Author Bio
Student, Undergraduate level in Pune, India
Hello - I see that you are a student at the undergraduate level! Congratulations on an excellent effort in your essay.
I would like to make an observation about your comments - "would it escape Godel's results is a big question mark" and then shortly after - "Mathematics wins over every other method (perhaps) because it is based purely on deduction." While mathematics may be based on deduction, even deduction is not immune from Godel's results - in fact his Incompleteness theorems were proven deductively. The proof relied on the interesting properties of recursive statements, like "This Statement is False." How would you evaluate this statement?
I hope you find the many essays in this contest to be enlightening and educational. Please feel free to review and comments on mine - The How and The Why.
Regards - George Gantz
Greetings Sir,
Thank you for your encouraging words. I knew that my conclusion(which I spent very little time on) was not a very good one since I lacked the ideas to provide a better conclusion to my work. There's plenty of work to be done still on this. One more point that could be under dispute would be when I have not really given solid points / directions for the reader so that they clearly understand what my goal really was, I have just kept many blank spaces where I've said what could've been done. So there's lots to complete in here. I will keep working on the same and possibly include interaction between the points or bring in the notion of "objects".
Thank you very much for time and your honest assessment of this article. I shall certainly review your article and may others' since I have lot more to learn.
If you will then once I am ready with a better version of this I shall send the same to you as well.
Dear Anant Kolhar,
Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.
I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.
Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.
The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.
A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.
Joe Fisher, Realist
Nice essay Kolhar,
Your ideas and thinking are excellent for your age as you are a student, for eg...
'In the figure 1, we have a at space with boundaries that expand at a constant rate on to in_nity and it has the points marked. There is no clear origin present on this space and hence all measurements are relative.' You are accepting our universe as totally expanding.
A Good idea, I am having a small observation, Don't you think by considering only 40 percent of Galaxies which are redshifted, to think the Universe is expanding and there is Bigbang.... Probably you will have to consider the other 60 percent of Galaxies also.... What do you say? ............
..................... At this point I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ...............reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc...just have a look at my essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....
I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems
For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.
Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.
With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.
Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain
Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/
Best wishes to your essay.
For your blessings please................
=snp. gupta
Sameer,
A nicely written essay for your early stage showing that you've started to understand how little we truly understand. I particularly liked that you pointed out;
"there has never been a prominent incident where we stopped to think and question ourselves whether mathematics is the way to go about resolving nature's secrets to a great certainty. and.. ..we may need to think about Mathematics 2.0 if we are to make many a more significant discoveries."
I may not agree with your alternative (or I may find I do!) but I you may find it enlightening to look at my (top scored) last years essay identifying a crucial link between logic and arithmetic so far unexploited Red & Green Socks (I apply it this year).
For yours this year my favourite line; "we must not cease to ask this question "Why did we think about this like we have thought about something similar in our past?" Indeed how DO we learn to think differently. I hope you'll look at my essay which analyses that and finds an important insight to QM.
But never assume what you're taught or read is 'fact' rather than just theory, incomplete at best but all so far unsuccessful.
Well done. A deserved boost to your low score is on the way.
Peter
Dear Sirs!
Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.
New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.
New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.
Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.
Sincerely,
Dizhechko Boris
Dear Sameer Anant Kolhar,
Your essay is nicely written. I so appreciate you.
I think that for your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results.
I like this phrase that
"We might have divided the workings of nature into Physics, Astronomy, Chemistry, Biology et cetera. But nature will function will function as she's supposed to and we are mere observers who can just watch and learn all that we can and pass on the message to the coming generations in terms of intuition and mathematics.''
With Best Regards,
Ch.Bayarsaikhan