The Mind Beyond the Math by Mama V Promise

Dear Mama V Promise,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Nice essay Promise,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg...

"1. Over the ages, scholars have tried to classify metaphysical models into spiritually monistic, materially monistic, or dualistic categories...these being mutually exclusive of each other.

2. The earliest formal philosophies were spiritually monistic, starting with Advaita Vedanta from India, whose written emergence dates from 800-ish BCE...presumably documenting ideas that had been in circulation for millennia before. The concept of Mind-based oneness had even appeared in the Rig Veda--mainly a book of worship and ritual--around 1500 BCE

3. We may expect to visualize this dynamic in the neuroimaging of the future. As trauma represents an interruption in the flow of consciousness, we will be able to identify the

neurological level at which it happened. Etc..."

A Good idea, I fully agree with you, probably the Universe also had a mind and consciousness of its own ................................. I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ...............reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc...just have a look at my essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....

I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Best wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please................

=snp. gupta

Dear Mama,

Kant's synthetic a priori judgments ( theorems, axioms, lemma, physical numerical constants, etc ) or " mindless mathematical laws" are observer independent, nevertheless, they have transcendental idealistic existence. Following Kant, such sort of a priori judgments must be product of some MetaLife which existed always. Idealism is always Idealism, however, some details of its formulation are very important.

When physicists suggest the first particle of the Universe existence, they assume that there must exist special mathematical rules deduced from some metamathematical a priori theorem of some MetaLife. Thus, in any case materialism cannot be foundation for any physics. In 1930s K. Godel and E. Schrodinger expressed the same idea.

With the best wishes

Michael

Author of Kantian Answers essay.

Dear Mama,

Very good essay. When you started to mention the Advaita Vedanta and idealist monisn, I knew I was going to enjoy reading your essay. I just don't understand why it is ranking so low in this contest.

Thank you for an inspiring read.

Cheers,

Patrick

Mama,

I enjoyed that read as a welcome break in a unique style. I also like your; 'Enselfification Principle' which seems to me to have links with 'homocentricity' which is a wholly subjective view of phenomena.

One thing I think needs correction, if only not to mislead readers, is your brief characterisation of the 'EPR Paradox' as;

"In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen identified the phenomenon of quantum entanglement which suggested that particles that had been previously joined would continue to affect each other even after separating a great distance (that is, info traveled between them faster than the speed of light).

In fact the 'founding fathers' (in John Bells words) of QM, mainly Neils Bohr, proposed (or 'identified') the phenomena in the 1920's and Einstein (later with Podolsji & Rosen) objected strongly (big row at the Solvay conference in 1927!) calling it 'spooky' action at a distance. Subtle but quite important difference.

Most assume Einstein wrong but I show this year that Bohr 'missed' the 2nd momentum distribution on a spinning sphere, (he only employed up/down NOT the orthogonal 'curl') which allows QM to be derived classically and QM and SR to be unified. Shocking? Yes. Changing physics? Can that now be done then??

Thanks for the read. I see you only have 8 scores when I think 10 is needed to qualify. Another and suitable improvement to your total is coming.

Very best wishes.

Peter

Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris