THE COMPLEX QUANTUM-STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS. by Dr.Narayan Kumar Bhadra

Dear, Р"октор Нараян Кумар Р'С...адра

I inform all the participants that use the electronic translator, therefore, my essay is written badly. I participate in the contest to familiarize English-speaking scientists with New Cartesian Physic, the basis of which the principle of identity of space and matter. Combining space and matter into a single essence, the New Cartesian Physic is able to integrate modern physics into a single theory. Let FQXi will be the starting point of this Association.

Don't let the New Cartesian Physic disappear! Do not ask for himself, but for Descartes.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential in understanding the world. To show potential in this essay I risked give "The way of The materialist explanation of the paranormal and the supernatural" - Is the name of my essay.

Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic. After you give a post in my topic, I shall do the same.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

Hello Mr Bhadra,

a beautiful creation with lie algebras and consciousness.

All the best.

Nice essay Dr NK Bhadra,

You said.... "We consider the whole universe being multi-dimensional. We consider the universe having (4+D)-dimensional Friedmann-Robertson-Walker type universe having complex scale factor R + iRI , where R is the scale factor corresponding to the usual 4-dimensional Universe while iRI is that of D-dimensional space-time."

A Good idea, I am having a small observation, Don't you think by considering only 40 percent of Galaxies which are redshifted, to think the Universe is expanding and there is Bigbang.... Probably you will have to consider the other 60 percent of Galaxies also.... What do you say? ............

..................... At this point I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ...............reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc...just have a look at the essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....

I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Best wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please................

=snp. gupta

Dear Dr.Narayan Kumar Bhadra [,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

P.S. My essay, THE SIMPLEST OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE that I submitted to the Indian Institute of Science Journal of Current Science on November 20, 2016 is still listed as being reviewed since December 28, 2016. My road runner email server cannot access the editor of the Journal of Current Science site. Do you know of another contact email?

Joe Fisher, Realist

Dear Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra,

As you said that "The universe having (4+D)-dimensional Friedmann-Robertson-Walker type universe having complex scale factor R + iRI , where R is the scale factor corresponding to the usual 4-dimensional Universe while iRI is that of D-dimensional space-time." It is much interesting for me.

I think that you consider that consciousness of human brain is as an interference hologram of incoming data and already existing data (a "personal universe") which equivalent to the subject's memory.

I will read your essay more studiously, and then I will post comments in detail.

By the way, I would like to say that the positive and negative spatial flow must be represented by the complex analysis. If you have read my essay " A SPACE-TIME AS A PERFECT FLUID SINK FLOW", there the second term in Eq.6 may correspond the Fly-by Anomaly.

Actually, your essay is much interesting, I will read your essay more studiously, and then I will post comments in detail soon.

Ch.Bayarsaikhan.

Dr Narayan,

Your title first attracted me but I confess I was put off reading your essay by the language of your abstract. Having scored Ted Eriksons, leaving yours bottom, I felt guilty so made the effort. I must say it was some effort (I but I know reading mine is too!)

I'm afraid even approaching 50 years of studying the universe and nature (loosely 'physics') I 'bounced off' much of your essay, which may be largely my fault but it does seem more of a specialist paper than meeting the 'Sci-Am Level' essay specification (probably why it's drifted to the bottom). But I persisted and did find patches of plain English I could comprehend, and appreciate, and am sure there was more import than I could penetrate.

But major question; In the light of Bohr, von Neumann and so many stressing the importance of the detector, observer or meter as part of the system producing the observation is it helpful to still think in terms of; When the electron is not being observed, the electron behaves like a wave, but when an observing instrument is placed in the experiment, the electron behaves like a particle.? This early description is consistent with that for photons. But might it not lead to better understanding to consider the interaction involved in 'observation' of involving absorption and re-emission, so re-quantization of the energy at ALL interactions? In that case it wouldn't be the electron 'behaves like' a particle but the energy BECOMES particulate each time DUE TO the interaction? (and indeed the 'cascade' of interactions, also as in QCD).

Thoughts?

Despite the above I'm sure your essay deserves a better place and my score should help, though I'll try to understand more before finalizing it. I hope you may also read mine, also considering QM but identifying a classical derivation, with far more plain English but no less challenging, as there are aspects you may recognize and offer helpful contribution.

Very best wishes

Peter

Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

Dear Dr Narayan Kumar Bhadra.

I have read your essay "The Complex Quantum-State of Consciousness"

Your essay is intriguing: your idea is about origin of the consciousness.

According to you, the consciousness, which is caused by biological system composed of charged elementary particles, originated by the wave / particle duality and entanglement.

Also you tried to model it mathematically, as a space with many extra dimensions.

It is something interesting for me, which should be thought.

The phrases are nice that

We consider the whole universe being multi-dimensional. We consider the universe having (4+D)-dimensional Friedmann-Robertson-Walker type universe having complex scale factor R + iRI , where R is the scale factor corresponding to the usual 4-dimensional Universe while iRI is that of D-dimensional space-time.

We may consider that the extra-dimensions 'D' are associated with a mental or that of the individual mind is (partly) an expression of a universal mind through holonomic communication with quantum fields.

The human brain conceived as an interfacing organ that not only produces mind and consciousness but also receives information. The brain or parts of the brain are conceived as an interference hologram of incoming data and already existing data (a "personal universe") which equivalent to the subject's memory.

While electrons in the brain behave as particles, these electrons prevent the consciousness from realizing that it is part of a larger whole. When the electrons behave as a wave, the consciousness becomes aware of its existence outside the human mind, which makes OBE and NDE possible. Whenever the electron wave function collapses, the OBE and NDE ends and the person returns to their physical body and its perception of reality similar to the collapsing of the wave function in the double slit experiment in quantum physics.

I very appreciate your essay and also I would like to read many other articles and books.

With Best Regards,

Ch.Bayarsaikhan